skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/physics/particle-physics-guide/SKILL.md
Particle physics data analysis with ROOT, HEPData, and event processing
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research particle-physics-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for analyzing particle physics data, covering event reconstruction, histogram analysis, statistical methods for discovery, and the standard tools used in high-energy physics (HEP) research. Includes ROOT, uproot, pyhf, and HEPData workflows.
| Format | Description | Typical Size | Access Tool | |--------|-------------|-------------|-------------| | ROOT (.root) | Columnar binary format, HEP standard | GB-TB | ROOT, uproot | | NanoAOD | Compact analysis format (CMS) | ~1 KB/event | uproot, coffea | | DAOD_PHYS | Derived analysis format (ATLAS) | ~10 KB/event | ROOT, uproot | | HepMC | Monte Carlo event record | Variable | pyhepmc | | HEPData | Published results (YAML/JSON) | KB | hepdata_lib |
import uproot
import awkward as ak
import numpy as np
def load_nanoaod(filepath: str, tree_name: str = "Events",
branches: list[str] = None) -> ak.Array:
"""
Load a NanoAOD ROOT file into an awkward array.
branches: list of branch names to load (None = all)
"""
with uproot.open(filepath) as f:
tree = f[tree_name]
if branches is None:
branches = tree.keys()
events = tree.arrays(branches, library="ak")
print(f"Loaded {len(events)} events")
print(f"Branches: {events.fields}")
return events
# Example: Load muon data
events = load_nanoaod("nano_data.root", branches=[
"nMuon", "Muon_pt", "Muon_eta", "Muon_phi", "Muon_mass",
"Muon_charge", "Muon_pfRelIso04_all", "Muon_tightId",
])
def compute_invariant_mass(pt1, eta1, phi1, mass1,
pt2, eta2, phi2, mass2):
"""
Compute invariant mass of a particle pair from 4-momentum components.
Uses the relativistic energy-momentum relation.
"""
# Convert to Cartesian 4-vectors
px1 = pt1 * np.cos(phi1)
py1 = pt1 * np.sin(phi1)
pz1 = pt1 * np.sinh(eta1)
e1 = np.sqrt(px1**2 + py1**2 + pz1**2 + mass1**2)
px2 = pt2 * np.cos(phi2)
py2 = pt2 * np.sin(phi2)
pz2 = pt2 * np.sinh(eta2)
e2 = np.sqrt(px2**2 + py2**2 + pz2**2 + mass2**2)
# Invariant mass of the pair
m_inv = np.sqrt(
(e1 + e2)**2 - (px1 + px2)**2 - (py1 + py2)**2 - (pz1 + pz2)**2
)
return m_inv
def select_z_candidates(events):
"""
Select Z -> mu+mu- candidates from NanoAOD events.
Requires exactly 2 opposite-sign muons passing quality cuts.
"""
# Quality cuts
muon_mask = (
(events.Muon_pt > 20) & # pT > 20 GeV
(abs(events.Muon_eta) < 2.4) & # |eta| < 2.4
(events.Muon_tightId == True) & # tight muon ID
(events.Muon_pfRelIso04_all < 0.15) # relative isolation
)
# Apply mask and require exactly 2 muons
good_muons = events[muon_mask]
dimuon_events = good_muons[ak.num(good_muons.Muon_pt) == 2]
# Opposite sign requirement
opposite_sign = (
dimuon_events.Muon_charge[:, 0] * dimuon_events.Muon_charge[:, 1] < 0
)
z_candidates = dimuon_events[opposite_sign]
# Compute invariant mass
m_inv = compute_invariant_mass(
z_candidates.Muon_pt[:, 0], z_candidates.Muon_eta[:, 0],
z_candidates.Muon_phi[:, 0], z_candidates.Muon_mass[:, 0],
z_candidates.Muon_pt[:, 1], z_candidates.Muon_eta[:, 1],
z_candidates.Muon_phi[:, 1], z_candidates.Muon_mass[:, 1],
)
return m_inv
import pyhf
def build_counting_model(signal: float, background: float,
bkg_uncertainty: float) -> dict:
"""
Build a simple counting experiment model in pyhf.
signal: expected signal yield
background: expected background yield
bkg_uncertainty: relative uncertainty on background
"""
model = pyhf.simplemodels.uncorrelated_background(
signal=[signal],
bkg=[background],
bkg_uncertainty=[bkg_uncertainty * background],
)
# Observed data (background-only for expected limit)
data = [background] + model.config.auxdata
return {"model": model, "data": data}
def compute_cls(model, data, poi_values=None):
"""
Compute CLs exclusion limits (frequentist hypothesis test).
Uses the CLs method standard in HEP.
"""
if poi_values is None:
poi_values = np.linspace(0, 5, 50)
obs_cls = []
exp_cls = []
for mu in poi_values:
result = pyhf.infer.hypotest(
mu, data, model["model"],
test_stat="qtilde",
return_expected_set=True,
)
obs_cls.append(float(result[0]))
exp_cls.append([float(v) for v in result[1]])
return {
"poi_values": poi_values.tolist(),
"observed_cls": obs_cls,
"expected_cls": exp_cls,
}
def discovery_significance(n_observed: float, n_background: float,
sigma_b: float = 0) -> dict:
"""
Compute discovery significance for a counting experiment.
n_observed: number of observed events
n_background: expected background
sigma_b: uncertainty on background
"""
from scipy.stats import norm
if sigma_b == 0:
# Simple Poisson significance
# Z = sqrt(2 * (n * ln(n/b) - (n - b)))
if n_observed <= n_background:
z = 0
else:
z = np.sqrt(2 * (
n_observed * np.log(n_observed / n_background)
- (n_observed - n_background)
))
else:
# With systematic uncertainty (profile likelihood approximation)
tau = n_background / sigma_b**2
n = n_observed
b = n_background
z = np.sqrt(2 * (
n * np.log((n * (b + tau)) / (b**2 + n * tau))
- (b**2 / tau) * np.log(1 + tau * (n - b) / (b * (b + tau)))
))
p_value = 1 - norm.cdf(z)
return {
"z_significance": round(z, 4),
"p_value": p_value,
"is_evidence": z >= 3.0, # 3 sigma = evidence
"is_discovery": z >= 5.0, # 5 sigma = discovery
}
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def fit_breit_wigner_plus_bg(bin_centers: np.ndarray,
bin_contents: np.ndarray,
mass_range: tuple = (80, 100)) -> dict:
"""
Fit a Breit-Wigner (resonance) + polynomial background to a mass histogram.
Standard approach for Z boson mass measurement.
"""
def model(m, N_sig, M_Z, Gamma_Z, a0, a1):
# Breit-Wigner
bw = N_sig * Gamma_Z / (2 * np.pi) / (
(m - M_Z)**2 + (Gamma_Z / 2)**2
)
# Linear background
bg = a0 + a1 * (m - 91.0)
return bw + bg
mask = (bin_centers >= mass_range[0]) & (bin_centers <= mass_range[1])
x = bin_centers[mask]
y = bin_contents[mask]
p0 = [1000, 91.2, 2.5, 10, 0] # initial guess
popt, pcov = curve_fit(model, x, y, p0=p0, sigma=np.sqrt(y + 1))
perr = np.sqrt(np.diag(pcov))
return {
"M_Z": f"{popt[1]:.3f} +/- {perr[1]:.3f} GeV",
"Gamma_Z": f"{popt[2]:.3f} +/- {perr[2]:.3f} GeV",
"N_signal": f"{popt[0]:.0f} +/- {perr[0]:.0f}",
"chi2_ndf": round(np.sum(((y - model(x, *popt))**2 / (y + 1))) / (len(x) - 5), 2),
}
1. Matrix element calculation (MadGraph, Sherpa, POWHEG)
--> Hard scattering process (e.g., pp -> Z -> mu+mu-)
2. Parton shower (Pythia, Herwig)
--> QCD radiation, initial/final state radiation
3. Hadronization (Pythia string model, Herwig cluster model)
--> Quarks/gluons -> hadrons
4. Detector simulation (Geant4 via CMSSW/Athena, or Delphes for fast sim)
--> Particle interactions with detector material
5. Reconstruction
--> Raw hits -> tracks, clusters, physics objects
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.