skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/paper-review/paper-reading-assistant/SKILL.md
AI-assisted paper reading, PDF Q&A, and summarization workflows
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research paper-reading-assistantInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Systematic workflows for reading, annotating, and extracting insights from academic papers, including AI-assisted summarization and critical analysis techniques.
Srinivasan Keshav's three-pass approach provides a structured way to read papers at increasing depth:
Read only:
After Pass 1, you should know:
Decision: Stop here if the paper is not relevant, or continue to Pass 2.
Read the full paper, but skip proofs and complex derivations:
After Pass 2, you should be able to:
For papers you need to deeply understand:
Use a consistent template for every paper you read:
# Paper Notes: [Short Title]
## Metadata
- **Title**: Full title
- **Authors**: First Author et al. (Year)
- **Venue**: Conference/Journal
- **DOI/URL**: link
- **Date read**: YYYY-MM-DD
## Summary (2-3 sentences)
What does this paper do, and what are the main findings?
## Problem
What problem does this paper address? Why is it important?
## Method
How do they approach the problem? Key technical details.
## Key Results
- Result 1: ...
- Result 2: ...
- Result 3: ...
## Strengths
- Strength 1: ...
- Strength 2: ...
## Weaknesses / Limitations
- Weakness 1: ...
- Weakness 2: ...
## Questions / Things I Don't Understand
- Question 1: ...
## Relevance to My Work
How does this connect to my research? What can I use?
## Key References to Follow Up
- [Author, Year] - Why it seems relevant
Use structured prompts to extract specific information from papers:
# Prompt template for paper summarization
summarize_prompt = """Read the following academic paper and provide:
1. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: The core contribution in a single sentence.
2. KEY FINDINGS (3-5 bullet points):
- Finding 1 with specific numbers/results
- Finding 2 ...
3. METHODOLOGY: Describe the approach in 2-3 sentences.
4. LIMITATIONS: List 2-3 limitations acknowledged or unacknowledged.
5. RELEVANCE: How does this relate to [your research topic]?
Paper text:
{paper_text}
"""
# Prompt for critical analysis
critique_prompt = """Analyze the following paper critically:
1. VALIDITY: Are the experimental design and statistical analyses sound?
Identify any threats to internal/external validity.
2. NOVELTY: What is genuinely new? What is incremental?
3. REPRODUCIBILITY: Could you replicate this study from the description given?
What information is missing?
4. ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS: Are there alternative interpretations
of the results that the authors do not consider?
5. FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS: What would you want to investigate next?
Paper text:
{paper_text}
"""
import fitz # PyMuPDF
def extract_paper_text(pdf_path):
"""Extract structured text from an academic paper PDF."""
doc = fitz.open(pdf_path)
sections = []
current_section = {"heading": "Preamble", "text": ""}
for page_num, page in enumerate(doc):
blocks = page.get_text("dict")["blocks"]
for block in blocks:
if "lines" not in block:
continue
for line in block["lines"]:
text = "".join(span["text"] for span in line["spans"])
font_size = max(span["size"] for span in line["spans"])
is_bold = any("Bold" in span.get("font", "") for span in line["spans"])
# Heuristic: detect section headings
if is_bold and font_size > 11 and len(text.strip()) < 80:
if current_section["text"].strip():
sections.append(current_section)
current_section = {"heading": text.strip(), "text": ""}
else:
current_section["text"] += text + " "
if current_section["text"].strip():
sections.append(current_section)
doc.close()
return sections
# Extract and display
sections = extract_paper_text("paper.pdf")
for s in sections:
print(f"\n## {s['heading']}")
print(s['text'][:200] + "...")
import os
import json
def process_paper_batch(pdf_dir, output_file):
"""Process a batch of papers and save structured notes."""
results = []
for filename in os.listdir(pdf_dir):
if not filename.endswith(".pdf"):
continue
pdf_path = os.path.join(pdf_dir, filename)
sections = extract_paper_text(pdf_path)
# Find title (usually first bold text or first line)
title = sections[0]["heading"] if sections else filename
# Find abstract
abstract = ""
for s in sections:
if "abstract" in s["heading"].lower():
abstract = s["text"].strip()
break
results.append({
"filename": filename,
"title": title,
"abstract": abstract,
"num_sections": len(sections),
"total_chars": sum(len(s["text"]) for s in sections)
})
with open(output_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(results, f, indent=2)
return results
| Tool | Platform | Highlights | PDF Annotation | AI Features | Collaboration | |------|----------|-----------|---------------|-------------|---------------| | Zotero + ZotFile | All | Reference management + PDF | Yes | No (plugins available) | Group libraries | | Paperpile | Web/Chrome | Google Docs integration | Yes | No | Shared folders | | ReadCube Papers | All | Smart citations | Yes | Recommendations | Shared libraries | | Semantic Reader | Web | AI-augmented reading | Yes | Inline explanations, TLDRs | No | | Elicit | Web | AI paper search | No | Automated extraction | Tables | | Scholarcy | Web | Flashcard summaries | Yes | Auto-summarization | No |
| Paper Type | Focus On | Time Budget | |-----------|----------|-------------| | Seminal paper | Full three-pass reading, understand every detail | 3-4 hours | | Survey/review | Section headings, taxonomy, open questions | 1-2 hours | | Methods paper | Algorithm/procedure sections, pseudocode, evaluation | 1-2 hours | | Results paper | Figures, tables, statistical tests, effect sizes | 30-60 min | | Position paper | Arguments, assumptions, counterarguments | 30-60 min | | Related work (peripheral) | Abstract + conclusion only (Pass 1) | 5-10 min |
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.