brycewang-stanford/obsidian-experiment-log
skills/33-Galaxy-Dawn-claude-scholar/skills/obsidian-experiment-log/SKILL.md
Use this skill when the user discusses experiment design, ablations, training runs, evaluation, baselines, metrics, failures, or result interpretation that should be logged into Obsidian experiment and result notes.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research obsidian-experiment-logInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 4, 2026, 3:55 AM283.9s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- obsidian-experiment-log
- description:
- Use this skill when the user discusses experiment design, ablations, training runs, evaluation, baselines, metrics, failures, or result interpretation that should be logged into Obsidian experiment and result notes.
Obsidian Experiment Log
Use this skill whenever project work changes the experimental state.
Role in the workflow
This is a supporting skill under obsidian-project-memory.
It should help maintain canonical experiment and result notes, not create note sprawl.
Default outputs
- the relevant canonical note in
Experiments/ - the relevant canonical note in
Results/, if a durable finding exists - links from today's
Daily/note - relevant hub or plan references only when project state materially changes
Main rules
- Prefer updating an existing experiment note over creating a sibling note for the same experiment line.
- Prefer updating an existing result note over creating a parallel result page for the same durable finding.
- Raw logs, metric dumps, and temporary analysis fragments should usually stay in
Daily/until they are interpreted. - A result note should exist only when the outcome is stable enough to reference later.
Minimum experiment sections
- Goal / hypothesis
- Code or config entrypoint
- Dataset / split
- Metrics
- Status (
planned,running,done,failed) - Findings / notes
- Next step
Minimum result sections
- Linked experiment
- Main observation
- Key numbers
- Evidence
- Interpretation
- Decision: keep / iterate / discard
Linking rule
Link experiments and results directly to each other, and link both back to 00-Hub.md, 01-Plan.md, or Daily/ only when those references improve the main working surface.
Research path handoff
Treat experiment notes as the bridge between Papers/ and Results/:
- paper-derived hypotheses, baselines, and ablations should land here,
- stable findings should be promoted from here into
Results/, - when a result becomes claim-worthy, update
Writing/rather than leaving the chain unfinished.
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/thematic-analysis
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/slr-prisma
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-placebo-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-causalpy-experiments
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026