skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/analysis/statistics/nonparametric-tests-guide/SKILL.md
Apply Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and other nonparametric methods
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research nonparametric-tests-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for selecting and applying nonparametric statistical tests when data violate parametric assumptions. Covers rank-based tests for group comparisons, correlation, and paired data, with implementation examples and guidance on reporting.
Use nonparametric tests when:
- Data are ordinal (Likert scales, rankings)
- Distribution is clearly non-normal (heavy skew, outliers)
- Sample size is very small (n < 15-20 per group)
- Homogeneity of variance is violated
- You are analyzing ranks or medians rather than means
Use parametric tests when:
- Data are approximately normal (or n > 30 by CLT)
- Variance is homogeneous across groups
- You need greater statistical power
- The parametric assumptions are reasonably met
| Parametric Test | Nonparametric Alternative | Use Case | |----------------|--------------------------|----------| | Independent t-test | Mann-Whitney U | Compare 2 independent groups | | Paired t-test | Wilcoxon signed-rank | Compare 2 related samples | | One-way ANOVA | Kruskal-Wallis H | Compare 3+ independent groups | | Repeated measures ANOVA | Friedman test | Compare 3+ related samples | | Pearson correlation | Spearman rank correlation | Measure association | | Chi-square test | Fisher's exact test | Compare proportions (small n) |
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np
def mann_whitney_test(group_a: list, group_b: list) -> dict:
"""
Perform Mann-Whitney U test for two independent groups.
Args:
group_a: Observations from group A
group_b: Observations from group B
"""
statistic, p_value = stats.mannwhitneyu(
group_a, group_b, alternative="two-sided"
)
n_a, n_b = len(group_a), len(group_b)
# Rank-biserial correlation as effect size
r = 1 - (2 * statistic) / (n_a * n_b)
return {
"U_statistic": statistic,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_a": n_a,
"n_b": n_b,
"median_a": np.median(group_a),
"median_b": np.median(group_b),
"effect_size_r": abs(r),
"effect_interpretation": (
"small" if abs(r) < 0.3
else "medium" if abs(r) < 0.5
else "large"
)
}
# Example usage
control = [12, 15, 14, 10, 13, 11, 16, 9, 14, 12]
treatment = [18, 22, 19, 17, 20, 21, 16, 23, 19, 20]
result = mann_whitney_test(control, treatment)
print(f"U = {result['U_statistic']}, p = {result['p_value']:.4f}")
print(f"Effect size r = {result['effect_size_r']:.3f} ({result['effect_interpretation']})")
def kruskal_wallis_with_posthoc(*groups) -> dict:
"""
Perform Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc comparisons.
Args:
*groups: Variable number of group data arrays
"""
# Omnibus test
h_stat, p_value = stats.kruskal(*groups)
result = {
"H_statistic": h_stat,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_groups": len(groups),
"group_medians": [np.median(g) for g in groups]
}
# If significant, perform pairwise Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction
if p_value < 0.05:
n_comparisons = len(groups) * (len(groups) - 1) // 2
pairwise = []
for i in range(len(groups)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(groups)):
u, p = stats.mannwhitneyu(groups[i], groups[j])
pairwise.append({
"comparison": f"Group {i+1} vs Group {j+1}",
"U": u,
"p_raw": p,
"p_adjusted": min(p * n_comparisons, 1.0),
"significant": (p * n_comparisons) < 0.05
})
result["posthoc"] = pairwise
return result
def wilcoxon_signed_rank(before: list, after: list) -> dict:
"""
Perform Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data.
Args:
before: Pre-intervention measurements
after: Post-intervention measurements
"""
statistic, p_value = stats.wilcoxon(before, after)
n = len(before)
# Effect size: r = Z / sqrt(N)
z_score = stats.norm.ppf(1 - p_value / 2)
r = z_score / np.sqrt(n)
differences = [a - b for a, b in zip(after, before)]
return {
"W_statistic": statistic,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_pairs": n,
"median_difference": np.median(differences),
"effect_size_r": abs(r)
}
def spearman_correlation(x: list, y: list) -> dict:
"""
Compute Spearman rank correlation.
"""
rho, p_value = stats.spearmanr(x, y)
return {
"rho": rho,
"p_value": p_value,
"interpretation": (
"negligible" if abs(rho) < 0.1
else "weak" if abs(rho) < 0.3
else "moderate" if abs(rho) < 0.5
else "strong" if abs(rho) < 0.7
else "very strong"
)
}
Mann-Whitney U:
"A Mann-Whitney U test indicated that treatment scores
(Mdn = 20.0) were significantly higher than control scores
(Mdn = 13.0), U = 5.0, p < .001, r = .82."
Kruskal-Wallis:
"A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed a significant difference
in scores across the three conditions, H(2) = 15.32,
p < .001. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni
correction revealed..."
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank:
"A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the intervention
significantly improved scores (Mdn_diff = 4.5),
W = 12.0, p = .003, r = .58."
Spearman:
"There was a strong positive correlation between X and Y,
r_s = .72, p < .001."
Always report effect sizes alongside p-values. For rank-biserial correlation r: small (0.1), medium (0.3), large (0.5). For Spearman rho, use standard correlation benchmarks. Effect sizes allow readers to judge practical significance independent of sample size.
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.