skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/analysis/statistics/nonparametric-tests-guide/SKILL.md
Apply Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and other nonparametric methods
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research nonparametric-tests-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for selecting and applying nonparametric statistical tests when data violate parametric assumptions. Covers rank-based tests for group comparisons, correlation, and paired data, with implementation examples and guidance on reporting.
Use nonparametric tests when:
- Data are ordinal (Likert scales, rankings)
- Distribution is clearly non-normal (heavy skew, outliers)
- Sample size is very small (n < 15-20 per group)
- Homogeneity of variance is violated
- You are analyzing ranks or medians rather than means
Use parametric tests when:
- Data are approximately normal (or n > 30 by CLT)
- Variance is homogeneous across groups
- You need greater statistical power
- The parametric assumptions are reasonably met
| Parametric Test | Nonparametric Alternative | Use Case | |----------------|--------------------------|----------| | Independent t-test | Mann-Whitney U | Compare 2 independent groups | | Paired t-test | Wilcoxon signed-rank | Compare 2 related samples | | One-way ANOVA | Kruskal-Wallis H | Compare 3+ independent groups | | Repeated measures ANOVA | Friedman test | Compare 3+ related samples | | Pearson correlation | Spearman rank correlation | Measure association | | Chi-square test | Fisher's exact test | Compare proportions (small n) |
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np
def mann_whitney_test(group_a: list, group_b: list) -> dict:
"""
Perform Mann-Whitney U test for two independent groups.
Args:
group_a: Observations from group A
group_b: Observations from group B
"""
statistic, p_value = stats.mannwhitneyu(
group_a, group_b, alternative="two-sided"
)
n_a, n_b = len(group_a), len(group_b)
# Rank-biserial correlation as effect size
r = 1 - (2 * statistic) / (n_a * n_b)
return {
"U_statistic": statistic,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_a": n_a,
"n_b": n_b,
"median_a": np.median(group_a),
"median_b": np.median(group_b),
"effect_size_r": abs(r),
"effect_interpretation": (
"small" if abs(r) < 0.3
else "medium" if abs(r) < 0.5
else "large"
)
}
# Example usage
control = [12, 15, 14, 10, 13, 11, 16, 9, 14, 12]
treatment = [18, 22, 19, 17, 20, 21, 16, 23, 19, 20]
result = mann_whitney_test(control, treatment)
print(f"U = {result['U_statistic']}, p = {result['p_value']:.4f}")
print(f"Effect size r = {result['effect_size_r']:.3f} ({result['effect_interpretation']})")
def kruskal_wallis_with_posthoc(*groups) -> dict:
"""
Perform Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc comparisons.
Args:
*groups: Variable number of group data arrays
"""
# Omnibus test
h_stat, p_value = stats.kruskal(*groups)
result = {
"H_statistic": h_stat,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_groups": len(groups),
"group_medians": [np.median(g) for g in groups]
}
# If significant, perform pairwise Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction
if p_value < 0.05:
n_comparisons = len(groups) * (len(groups) - 1) // 2
pairwise = []
for i in range(len(groups)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(groups)):
u, p = stats.mannwhitneyu(groups[i], groups[j])
pairwise.append({
"comparison": f"Group {i+1} vs Group {j+1}",
"U": u,
"p_raw": p,
"p_adjusted": min(p * n_comparisons, 1.0),
"significant": (p * n_comparisons) < 0.05
})
result["posthoc"] = pairwise
return result
def wilcoxon_signed_rank(before: list, after: list) -> dict:
"""
Perform Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data.
Args:
before: Pre-intervention measurements
after: Post-intervention measurements
"""
statistic, p_value = stats.wilcoxon(before, after)
n = len(before)
# Effect size: r = Z / sqrt(N)
z_score = stats.norm.ppf(1 - p_value / 2)
r = z_score / np.sqrt(n)
differences = [a - b for a, b in zip(after, before)]
return {
"W_statistic": statistic,
"p_value": p_value,
"n_pairs": n,
"median_difference": np.median(differences),
"effect_size_r": abs(r)
}
def spearman_correlation(x: list, y: list) -> dict:
"""
Compute Spearman rank correlation.
"""
rho, p_value = stats.spearmanr(x, y)
return {
"rho": rho,
"p_value": p_value,
"interpretation": (
"negligible" if abs(rho) < 0.1
else "weak" if abs(rho) < 0.3
else "moderate" if abs(rho) < 0.5
else "strong" if abs(rho) < 0.7
else "very strong"
)
}
Mann-Whitney U:
"A Mann-Whitney U test indicated that treatment scores
(Mdn = 20.0) were significantly higher than control scores
(Mdn = 13.0), U = 5.0, p < .001, r = .82."
Kruskal-Wallis:
"A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed a significant difference
in scores across the three conditions, H(2) = 15.32,
p < .001. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni
correction revealed..."
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank:
"A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that the intervention
significantly improved scores (Mdn_diff = 4.5),
W = 12.0, p = .003, r = .58."
Spearman:
"There was a strong positive correlation between X and Y,
r_s = .72, p < .001."
Always report effect sizes alongside p-values. For rank-biserial correlation r: small (0.1), medium (0.3), large (0.5). For Spearman rho, use standard correlation benchmarks. Effect sizes allow readers to judge practical significance independent of sample size.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.