skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/ai-ml/nlp-toolkit-guide/SKILL.md
NLP analysis with perplexity scoring, burstiness, and entropy metrics
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research nlp-toolkit-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Natural Language Processing research requires a diverse set of analytical tools beyond standard model training. Text quality assessment, AI-generated text detection, linguistic feature extraction, and corpus analysis all depend on well-understood metrics: perplexity, burstiness, entropy, and their variants.
This guide provides practical implementations of these core NLP metrics alongside patterns for tokenization, embedding analysis, and text feature engineering. The focus is on metrics used in active research areas -- AI text detection (perplexity + burstiness classifiers), information-theoretic analysis of corpora, and linguistic diversity measurement.
These tools are framework-agnostic where possible, but leverage Hugging Face Transformers for language model operations and standard Python scientific computing libraries for statistical analysis.
Perplexity measures how well a language model predicts a text. Lower perplexity means the text is more predictable to the model -- a key signal in AI text detection, model evaluation, and domain adaptation.
import torch
import numpy as np
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
def compute_perplexity(text: str, model_name: str = "gpt2") -> dict:
"""
Compute token-level and text-level perplexity using a causal LM.
Returns:
dict with 'perplexity', 'log_likelihood', 'token_perplexities'
"""
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
model.eval()
encodings = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=1024)
input_ids = encodings.input_ids
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(input_ids, labels=input_ids)
neg_log_likelihood = outputs.loss.item()
# Token-level perplexities for analysis
with torch.no_grad():
logits = outputs.logits[:, :-1, :] # Shift for next-token prediction
targets = input_ids[:, 1:]
log_probs = torch.log_softmax(logits, dim=-1)
token_log_probs = log_probs.gather(2, targets.unsqueeze(-1)).squeeze(-1)
token_perplexities = torch.exp(-token_log_probs).squeeze().tolist()
perplexity = np.exp(neg_log_likelihood)
return {
"perplexity": perplexity,
"log_likelihood": -neg_log_likelihood,
"token_perplexities": token_perplexities,
"num_tokens": input_ids.size(1),
}
Burstiness measures the tendency of words to appear in clusters rather than uniformly across a text. Human writing tends to be "burstier" -- once a topic is introduced, related terms cluster together, then disappear.
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
def compute_burstiness(text: str, min_freq: int = 2) -> dict:
"""
Compute burstiness score for a text.
Burstiness B = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)
where sigma and mu are the std dev and mean of inter-arrival times.
B ranges from -1 (periodic) to 1 (bursty). Human text typically B > 0.
"""
words = text.lower().split()
word_positions = {}
for i, word in enumerate(words):
word_positions.setdefault(word, []).append(i)
burstiness_scores = {}
for word, positions in word_positions.items():
if len(positions) < min_freq:
continue
inter_arrivals = np.diff(positions)
mu = np.mean(inter_arrivals)
sigma = np.std(inter_arrivals)
if mu + sigma == 0:
burstiness_scores[word] = 0.0
else:
burstiness_scores[word] = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)
# Aggregate burstiness
if burstiness_scores:
avg_burstiness = np.mean(list(burstiness_scores.values()))
else:
avg_burstiness = 0.0
return {
"average_burstiness": avg_burstiness,
"word_burstiness": burstiness_scores,
"num_words_analyzed": len(burstiness_scores),
}
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
def compute_entropy(text: str, level: str = "word") -> dict:
"""
Compute Shannon entropy at word or character level.
Higher entropy indicates more diverse, less predictable text.
AI-generated text often has lower entropy than human text.
"""
if level == "word":
tokens = text.lower().split()
elif level == "character":
tokens = list(text.lower())
else:
raise ValueError("level must be 'word' or 'character'")
counts = Counter(tokens)
total = sum(counts.values())
probabilities = np.array([c / total for c in counts.values()])
entropy = -np.sum(probabilities * np.log2(probabilities + 1e-12))
max_entropy = np.log2(len(counts)) if len(counts) > 1 else 1.0
normalized_entropy = entropy / max_entropy
return {
"entropy": entropy,
"normalized_entropy": normalized_entropy,
"vocabulary_size": len(counts),
"total_tokens": total,
"type_token_ratio": len(counts) / total,
}
def compute_conditional_entropy(text: str, n: int = 2) -> float:
"""Compute conditional entropy H(X_n | X_{n-1}) for n-gram analysis."""
words = text.lower().split()
if len(words) < n:
return 0.0
ngrams = [tuple(words[i:i+n]) for i in range(len(words) - n + 1)]
contexts = [ng[:-1] for ng in ngrams]
context_counts = Counter(contexts)
ngram_counts = Counter(ngrams)
h = 0.0
total = len(ngrams)
for ngram, count in ngram_counts.items():
context = ngram[:-1]
p_ngram = count / total
p_context = context_counts[context] / total
h -= p_ngram * np.log2(count / context_counts[context] + 1e-12)
return h
Combining perplexity, burstiness, and entropy into a detection pipeline:
def analyze_text_authenticity(text: str) -> dict:
"""
Multi-signal analysis for AI vs. human text classification.
Uses perplexity, burstiness, and entropy as features.
"""
perplexity_result = compute_perplexity(text)
burstiness_result = compute_burstiness(text)
entropy_result = compute_entropy(text, level="word")
char_entropy = compute_entropy(text, level="character")
# Heuristic thresholds from literature
signals = {
"low_perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"] < 30,
"low_burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"] < 0.1,
"low_entropy": entropy_result["normalized_entropy"] < 0.7,
"uniform_token_ppl": np.std(perplexity_result["token_perplexities"]) < 5,
}
ai_score = sum(signals.values()) / len(signals)
return {
"perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"],
"burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"],
"word_entropy": entropy_result["entropy"],
"char_entropy": char_entropy["entropy"],
"type_token_ratio": entropy_result["type_token_ratio"],
"ai_likelihood_score": ai_score,
"signals": signals,
}
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
def compare_tokenizers(text: str, models: list = None) -> dict:
"""Compare tokenization across different models for research analysis."""
if models is None:
models = ["gpt2", "bert-base-uncased", "facebook/opt-1.3b"]
results = {}
for model_name in models:
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokens = tokenizer.tokenize(text)
results[model_name] = {
"num_tokens": len(tokens),
"tokens": tokens[:50], # First 50 for inspection
"vocab_size": tokenizer.vocab_size,
"compression_ratio": len(text) / len(tokens),
}
return results
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.