skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/ai-ml/nlp-toolkit-guide/SKILL.md
NLP analysis with perplexity scoring, burstiness, and entropy metrics
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research nlp-toolkit-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Natural Language Processing research requires a diverse set of analytical tools beyond standard model training. Text quality assessment, AI-generated text detection, linguistic feature extraction, and corpus analysis all depend on well-understood metrics: perplexity, burstiness, entropy, and their variants.
This guide provides practical implementations of these core NLP metrics alongside patterns for tokenization, embedding analysis, and text feature engineering. The focus is on metrics used in active research areas -- AI text detection (perplexity + burstiness classifiers), information-theoretic analysis of corpora, and linguistic diversity measurement.
These tools are framework-agnostic where possible, but leverage Hugging Face Transformers for language model operations and standard Python scientific computing libraries for statistical analysis.
Perplexity measures how well a language model predicts a text. Lower perplexity means the text is more predictable to the model -- a key signal in AI text detection, model evaluation, and domain adaptation.
import torch
import numpy as np
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
def compute_perplexity(text: str, model_name: str = "gpt2") -> dict:
"""
Compute token-level and text-level perplexity using a causal LM.
Returns:
dict with 'perplexity', 'log_likelihood', 'token_perplexities'
"""
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name)
model.eval()
encodings = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=1024)
input_ids = encodings.input_ids
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(input_ids, labels=input_ids)
neg_log_likelihood = outputs.loss.item()
# Token-level perplexities for analysis
with torch.no_grad():
logits = outputs.logits[:, :-1, :] # Shift for next-token prediction
targets = input_ids[:, 1:]
log_probs = torch.log_softmax(logits, dim=-1)
token_log_probs = log_probs.gather(2, targets.unsqueeze(-1)).squeeze(-1)
token_perplexities = torch.exp(-token_log_probs).squeeze().tolist()
perplexity = np.exp(neg_log_likelihood)
return {
"perplexity": perplexity,
"log_likelihood": -neg_log_likelihood,
"token_perplexities": token_perplexities,
"num_tokens": input_ids.size(1),
}
Burstiness measures the tendency of words to appear in clusters rather than uniformly across a text. Human writing tends to be "burstier" -- once a topic is introduced, related terms cluster together, then disappear.
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
def compute_burstiness(text: str, min_freq: int = 2) -> dict:
"""
Compute burstiness score for a text.
Burstiness B = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)
where sigma and mu are the std dev and mean of inter-arrival times.
B ranges from -1 (periodic) to 1 (bursty). Human text typically B > 0.
"""
words = text.lower().split()
word_positions = {}
for i, word in enumerate(words):
word_positions.setdefault(word, []).append(i)
burstiness_scores = {}
for word, positions in word_positions.items():
if len(positions) < min_freq:
continue
inter_arrivals = np.diff(positions)
mu = np.mean(inter_arrivals)
sigma = np.std(inter_arrivals)
if mu + sigma == 0:
burstiness_scores[word] = 0.0
else:
burstiness_scores[word] = (sigma - mu) / (sigma + mu)
# Aggregate burstiness
if burstiness_scores:
avg_burstiness = np.mean(list(burstiness_scores.values()))
else:
avg_burstiness = 0.0
return {
"average_burstiness": avg_burstiness,
"word_burstiness": burstiness_scores,
"num_words_analyzed": len(burstiness_scores),
}
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
def compute_entropy(text: str, level: str = "word") -> dict:
"""
Compute Shannon entropy at word or character level.
Higher entropy indicates more diverse, less predictable text.
AI-generated text often has lower entropy than human text.
"""
if level == "word":
tokens = text.lower().split()
elif level == "character":
tokens = list(text.lower())
else:
raise ValueError("level must be 'word' or 'character'")
counts = Counter(tokens)
total = sum(counts.values())
probabilities = np.array([c / total for c in counts.values()])
entropy = -np.sum(probabilities * np.log2(probabilities + 1e-12))
max_entropy = np.log2(len(counts)) if len(counts) > 1 else 1.0
normalized_entropy = entropy / max_entropy
return {
"entropy": entropy,
"normalized_entropy": normalized_entropy,
"vocabulary_size": len(counts),
"total_tokens": total,
"type_token_ratio": len(counts) / total,
}
def compute_conditional_entropy(text: str, n: int = 2) -> float:
"""Compute conditional entropy H(X_n | X_{n-1}) for n-gram analysis."""
words = text.lower().split()
if len(words) < n:
return 0.0
ngrams = [tuple(words[i:i+n]) for i in range(len(words) - n + 1)]
contexts = [ng[:-1] for ng in ngrams]
context_counts = Counter(contexts)
ngram_counts = Counter(ngrams)
h = 0.0
total = len(ngrams)
for ngram, count in ngram_counts.items():
context = ngram[:-1]
p_ngram = count / total
p_context = context_counts[context] / total
h -= p_ngram * np.log2(count / context_counts[context] + 1e-12)
return h
Combining perplexity, burstiness, and entropy into a detection pipeline:
def analyze_text_authenticity(text: str) -> dict:
"""
Multi-signal analysis for AI vs. human text classification.
Uses perplexity, burstiness, and entropy as features.
"""
perplexity_result = compute_perplexity(text)
burstiness_result = compute_burstiness(text)
entropy_result = compute_entropy(text, level="word")
char_entropy = compute_entropy(text, level="character")
# Heuristic thresholds from literature
signals = {
"low_perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"] < 30,
"low_burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"] < 0.1,
"low_entropy": entropy_result["normalized_entropy"] < 0.7,
"uniform_token_ppl": np.std(perplexity_result["token_perplexities"]) < 5,
}
ai_score = sum(signals.values()) / len(signals)
return {
"perplexity": perplexity_result["perplexity"],
"burstiness": burstiness_result["average_burstiness"],
"word_entropy": entropy_result["entropy"],
"char_entropy": char_entropy["entropy"],
"type_token_ratio": entropy_result["type_token_ratio"],
"ai_likelihood_score": ai_score,
"signals": signals,
}
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
def compare_tokenizers(text: str, models: list = None) -> dict:
"""Compare tokenization across different models for research analysis."""
if models is None:
models = ["gpt2", "bert-base-uncased", "facebook/opt-1.3b"]
results = {}
for model_name in models:
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokens = tokenizer.tokenize(text)
results[model_name] = {
"num_tokens": len(tokens),
"tokens": tokens[:50], # First 50 for inspection
"vocab_size": tokenizer.vocab_size,
"compression_ratio": len(text) / len(tokens),
}
return results
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.