skills/42-wanshuiyin-ARIS/skills/monitor-experiment/SKILL.md
Monitor running experiments, check progress, collect results. Use when user says "check results", "is it done", "monitor", or wants experiment output.
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research monitor-experimentInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Monitor: $ARGUMENTS
SSH server:
ssh <server> "screen -ls"
Vast.ai instance (read ssh_host, ssh_port from vast-instances.json):
ssh -p <PORT> root@<HOST> "screen -ls"
Also check vast.ai instance status:
vastai show instances
For each screen session, capture the last N lines:
ssh <server> "screen -S <name> -X hardcopy /tmp/screen_<name>.txt && tail -50 /tmp/screen_<name>.txt"
If hardcopy fails, check for log files or tee output.
ssh <server> "ls -lt <results_dir>/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -20"
If JSON results exist, fetch and parse them:
ssh <server> "cat <results_dir>/<latest>.json"
wandb: true in CLAUDE.md)Skip this step entirely if wandb is not set or is false in CLAUDE.md.
Pull training curves and metrics from Weights & Biases via Python API:
# List recent runs in the project
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb
api = wandb.Api()
runs = api.runs('<entity>/<project>', per_page=10)
for r in runs:
print(f'{r.id} {r.state} {r.name} {r.summary.get(\"eval/loss\", \"N/A\")}')
\""
# Pull specific metrics from a run (last 50 steps)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
history = list(run.scan_history(keys=['train/loss', 'eval/loss', 'eval/ppl', 'train/lr'], page_size=50))
print(json.dumps(history[-10:], indent=2))
\""
# Pull run summary (final metrics)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
print(json.dumps(dict(run.summary), indent=2, default=str))
\""
What to extract:
W&B dashboard link (include in summary for user):
https://wandb.ai/<entity>/<project>/runs/<run_id>
This gives the auto-review-loop richer signal than just screen output — training dynamics, loss curves, and metric trends over time.
Present results in a comparison table:
| Experiment | Metric | Delta vs Baseline | Status |
|-----------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| Baseline | X.XX | — | done |
| Method A | X.XX | +Y.Y | done |
After results are collected, check ~/.claude/feishu.json:
experiment_done notification: results summary table, delta vs baseline"off": skip entirely (no-op)vast-instances.json). If all experiments on an instance are done, remind the user to run /vast-gpu destroy <instance_id> to stop billingdevelopment
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.