skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/biomedical/med-researcher-guide/SKILL.md
Multi-agent system for biomedical literature review and synthesis
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research med-researcher-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Med-Researcher is a multi-agent system designed specifically for biomedical literature review. It orchestrates specialized agents for searching PubMed and other medical databases, extracting structured evidence from clinical papers, and synthesizing findings into evidence-graded summaries. Particularly useful for clinical evidence reviews, drug interaction research, and systematic reviews in medicine.
Query → Planning Agent (decomposes clinical question)
↓
Search Agent (PubMed, PMC, clinical trials)
↓
Extraction Agent (PICO, outcomes, evidence grade)
↓
Synthesis Agent (evidence summary, contradictions)
↓
Report Agent (structured review output)
| Agent | Role | |-------|------| | Planner | Converts clinical question to PICO format, generates sub-queries | | Searcher | Queries PubMed, PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov | | Extractor | Extracts structured data: population, intervention, outcomes | | Synthesizer | Grades evidence, identifies consensus and contradictions | | Reporter | Generates formatted review with citations |
from med_researcher import MedResearcher
researcher = MedResearcher(
llm_provider="anthropic",
search_backends=["pubmed", "pmc", "clinical_trials"],
)
# Clinical question
result = researcher.review(
question="What is the comparative efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors "
"versus GLP-1 receptor agonists for cardiovascular "
"outcomes in type 2 diabetes?",
max_papers=50,
evidence_grading=True,
)
print(result.summary)
print(f"Papers analyzed: {len(result.papers)}")
print(f"Evidence grade: {result.overall_grade}")
# Automatic PICO extraction from clinical question
pico = researcher.extract_pico(
"Does metformin reduce cancer incidence in diabetic patients?"
)
# P: patients with diabetes
# I: metformin treatment
# C: no metformin / other antidiabetics
# O: cancer incidence
# Search with PICO components
result = researcher.review_pico(
population="type 2 diabetes patients",
intervention="metformin",
comparison="placebo or other antidiabetics",
outcome="cancer incidence",
)
# Evidence levels following GRADE methodology
for paper in result.papers:
print(f"{paper.title}")
print(f" Study type: {paper.study_type}") # RCT, cohort, case-control
print(f" Evidence level: {paper.evidence_level}") # High/Moderate/Low/Very Low
print(f" Risk of bias: {paper.bias_risk}")
print(f" Sample size: {paper.sample_size}")
# Aggregate evidence summary
print(f"\nOverall certainty: {result.certainty}")
print(f"Recommendation strength: {result.recommendation}")
researcher = MedResearcher(
search_config={
"pubmed": {
"max_results": 100,
"date_range": ("2020-01-01", "2025-12-31"),
"article_types": ["Clinical Trial", "Meta-Analysis",
"Randomized Controlled Trial"],
},
"clinical_trials": {
"status": ["Completed", "Active"],
"phase": ["Phase 3", "Phase 4"],
},
},
extraction_config={
"fields": ["population", "intervention", "comparator",
"primary_outcome", "secondary_outcomes",
"adverse_events", "sample_size", "follow_up"],
},
)
# Structured evidence table
result.export_evidence_table("evidence_table.csv")
# PRISMA flow diagram data
prisma = result.prisma_flow()
print(f"Identified: {prisma['identified']}")
print(f"Screened: {prisma['screened']}")
print(f"Included: {prisma['included']}")
# Bibliography
result.export_bibtex("references.bib")
# Full report
result.export_report("review.md", format="markdown")
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.