skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/discovery/literature-mapping-guide/SKILL.md
Visual literature mapping and connected papers exploration
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research literature-mapping-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Build visual maps of scholarly literature to understand research landscapes, identify clusters of related work, and discover hidden connections between papers.
Literature mapping transforms flat lists of papers into interactive visual networks where nodes represent papers and edges represent citation or similarity relationships. This approach helps researchers:
Connected Papers (connectedpapers.com) builds a similarity graph around a seed paper using co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis.
| Feature | Details | |---------|---------| | Input | Paper title, DOI, or URL | | Graph type | Similarity (not direct citation) | | Node size | Citation count | | Node color | Publication year (darker = older) | | Max nodes | ~40 per graph | | Cost | Free: 5 graphs/month; Premium: unlimited |
How to use:
Litmaps (litmaps.com) creates dynamic, multi-seed citation maps that update as new papers are published.
Workflow:
VOSviewer (vosviewer.com) is a free desktop tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks at scale.
# VOSviewer supports several network types:
# - Co-authorship networks
# - Co-citation networks
# - Bibliographic coupling networks
# - Co-occurrence of keywords
# - Citation networks
# Input formats:
# - Web of Science export files
# - Scopus CSV exports
# - Dimensions export files
# - RIS files from reference managers
# - CrossRef API queries (built-in)
Steps for VOSviewer analysis:
CiteSpace (citespace.podia.com) specializes in detecting research fronts and intellectual turning points.
Key features:
import networkx as nx
import requests
from collections import defaultdict
def build_citation_graph(seed_ids, depth=1, max_per_level=20):
"""Build a directed citation graph from seed papers."""
G = nx.DiGraph()
visited = set()
queue = [(sid, 0) for sid in seed_ids]
while queue:
paper_id, level = queue.pop(0)
if paper_id in visited or level > depth:
continue
visited.add(paper_id)
# Get paper metadata
meta_resp = requests.get(
f"https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{paper_id}",
params={"fields": "title,year,citationCount"}
)
if meta_resp.status_code != 200:
continue
meta = meta_resp.json()
G.add_node(paper_id, title=meta.get("title", ""),
year=meta.get("year"), citations=meta.get("citationCount", 0))
# Get references (backward)
refs_resp = requests.get(
f"https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{paper_id}/references",
params={"fields": "title,year,citationCount", "limit": max_per_level}
)
if refs_resp.status_code == 200:
for ref in refs_resp.json().get("data", []):
cited = ref["citedPaper"]
if cited.get("paperId"):
G.add_node(cited["paperId"], title=cited.get("title", ""),
year=cited.get("year"), citations=cited.get("citationCount", 0))
G.add_edge(paper_id, cited["paperId"], relation="cites")
if level < depth:
queue.append((cited["paperId"], level + 1))
return G
# Build graph from 2 seed papers
seeds = ["DOI:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2", "ARXIV:2005.14165"]
graph = build_citation_graph(seeds, depth=1, max_per_level=15)
print(f"Graph: {graph.number_of_nodes()} nodes, {graph.number_of_edges()} edges")
# Find most central papers
centrality = nx.betweenness_centrality(graph)
top_central = sorted(centrality.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)[:10]
for node_id, score in top_central:
title = graph.nodes[node_id].get("title", "Unknown")
print(f" Centrality={score:.3f}: {title}")
| Visual Feature | Interpretation | |---------------|---------------| | Large cluster | Established subfield with many related papers | | Small isolated cluster | Emerging or niche research area | | Bridge node between clusters | Interdisciplinary or foundational paper | | Dense interconnections | Mature area with extensive cross-referencing | | Sparse area between clusters | Potential research gap or opportunity | | Temporal gradient (old to new) | Evolution of ideas over time |
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.