skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/law/legal-nlp-guide/SKILL.md
NLP techniques for legal text analysis, case law mining, and contracts
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research legal-nlp-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for applying natural language processing techniques to legal texts. Covers legal document classification, named entity recognition for legal entities, contract clause extraction, case law similarity search, and court opinion summarization using modern NLP tools.
Legal language presents unique NLP challenges:
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
import torch
# Legal-BERT: domain-adapted BERT for legal text
model_name = "nlpaueb/legal-bert-base-uncased"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
model_name, num_labels=5
)
# Legal document categories
labels = ["contract", "court_opinion", "statute", "regulation", "brief"]
def classify_legal_document(text: str, max_length: int = 512) -> dict:
"""
Classify a legal document into predefined categories.
For long documents, use the first 512 tokens (typically the
preamble/introduction which contains strong classification signals).
"""
inputs = tokenizer(
text, return_tensors="pt",
max_length=max_length, truncation=True, padding=True
)
with torch.no_grad():
logits = model(**inputs).logits
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=-1).squeeze()
predicted = labels[probs.argmax().item()]
return {
"predicted_class": predicted,
"confidence": probs.max().item(),
"all_scores": {l: p.item() for l, p in zip(labels, probs)},
}
Common topic taxonomies for legal research:
| Category | Examples | |----------|---------| | Constitutional Law | Due process, equal protection, First Amendment | | Criminal Law | Sentencing, evidence, plea bargaining | | Contract Law | Breach, formation, damages | | Tort Law | Negligence, product liability, defamation | | Property Law | Real property, intellectual property, zoning | | Administrative Law | Agency rulemaking, judicial review |
Legal NER extends standard NER with domain-specific entity types:
import spacy
# Load a legal NER model (e.g., trained on the LegalNERo dataset)
# or fine-tune spaCy on legal annotations
nlp = spacy.load("en_legal_ner")
legal_entity_types = {
"COURT": "Court or tribunal name",
"JUDGE": "Judge or justice name",
"PARTY": "Plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent",
"STATUTE": "Statute or regulation citation",
"CASE_CITATION": "Case name and reporter citation",
"DATE": "Dates of decisions, filings, events",
"JURISDICTION": "Geographic or subject matter jurisdiction",
"PROVISION": "Specific section or clause reference",
}
def extract_legal_entities(text: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Extract legal named entities from text."""
doc = nlp(text)
entities = []
for ent in doc.ents:
entities.append({
"text": ent.text,
"label": ent.label_,
"start": ent.start_char,
"end": ent.end_char,
"description": legal_entity_types.get(ent.label_, ""),
})
return entities
import re
# US case citation patterns (simplified)
CASE_CITE_PATTERN = re.compile(
r"(?P<volume>\d+)\s+"
r"(?P<reporter>U\.S\.|S\.\s?Ct\.|F\.\s?\d[dthsr]+|"
r"F\.\s?Supp\.\s?\d*[dthsr]*)\s+"
r"(?P<page>\d+)"
r"(?:\s*,\s*(?P<pinpoint>\d+))?"
r"(?:\s*\((?P<year>\d{4})\))?"
)
def parse_citations(text: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Extract and parse legal citations from text."""
citations = []
for match in CASE_CITE_PATTERN.finditer(text):
citations.append({
"full_match": match.group(),
"volume": match.group("volume"),
"reporter": match.group("reporter"),
"page": match.group("page"),
"pinpoint": match.group("pinpoint"),
"year": match.group("year"),
})
return citations
def segment_contract_clauses(text: str) -> list[dict]:
"""
Segment a contract into numbered clauses and classify them.
Uses section numbering patterns as primary segmentation cues.
"""
# Split on section/article numbering patterns
section_pattern = re.compile(
r"\n\s*(?:Section|Article|Clause|\d+\.)\s+\d+[\.\d]*\s*[:\.\-]?\s*",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
sections = section_pattern.split(text)
headers = section_pattern.findall(text)
clause_types = {
"indemnification": ["indemnif", "hold harmless", "defend and indemnify"],
"termination": ["terminat", "cancel", "expir"],
"confidentiality": ["confidential", "non-disclosure", "proprietary"],
"limitation_of_liability": ["limit of liabilit", "limitation of liabilit",
"aggregate liability", "consequential damages"],
"governing_law": ["governing law", "governed by", "jurisdiction"],
"force_majeure": ["force majeure", "act of god", "beyond reasonable control"],
"assignment": ["assign", "transfer", "delegate"],
}
clauses = []
for i, section in enumerate(sections[1:], 1):
detected_type = "general"
section_lower = section.lower()
for ctype, keywords in clause_types.items():
if any(kw in section_lower for kw in keywords):
detected_type = ctype
break
clauses.append({
"index": i,
"header": headers[i - 1].strip() if i <= len(headers) else "",
"type": detected_type,
"text": section.strip()[:500],
})
return clauses
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
import numpy as np
# Legal domain sentence embeddings
encoder = SentenceTransformer("sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2")
def build_case_index(case_summaries: list[str]) -> np.ndarray:
"""Encode case summaries into dense vector representations."""
embeddings = encoder.encode(case_summaries, show_progress_bar=True)
# L2 normalize for cosine similarity via dot product
norms = np.linalg.norm(embeddings, axis=1, keepdims=True)
return embeddings / norms
def search_similar_cases(query: str, index: np.ndarray,
case_ids: list[str], top_k: int = 10) -> list:
"""Find the most similar cases to a query."""
query_vec = encoder.encode([query])
query_vec = query_vec / np.linalg.norm(query_vec)
scores = (index @ query_vec.T).squeeze()
top_indices = np.argsort(scores)[::-1][:top_k]
return [(case_ids[i], scores[i]) for i in top_indices]
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.