skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/paper-review/latte-review-guide/SKILL.md
Automate systematic literature reviews with LatteReview AI agents
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research latte-review-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
LatteReview is a low-code Python package that uses AI agents to automate systematic literature reviews. It handles title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, data extraction, and PRISMA-compliant reporting — tasks that typically consume hundreds of researcher-hours. Supports multiple LLM backends (Anthropic, OpenAI, local models).
pip install lattereview
from lattereview import ReviewProject
# Create a new review project
project = ReviewProject(
name="ML in Medical Imaging Review",
research_question="What deep learning architectures are used for "
"medical image segmentation?",
inclusion_criteria=[
"Uses deep learning for medical image segmentation",
"Published in peer-reviewed venue",
"Reports quantitative evaluation metrics",
],
exclusion_criteria=[
"Review/survey articles",
"Non-English publications",
"Conference abstracts only",
],
)
# Import from various sources
project.import_papers("scopus_export.csv", source="scopus")
project.import_papers("pubmed_export.csv", source="pubmed")
# Or from a DataFrame
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("papers.csv")
project.import_from_dataframe(df,
title_col="title",
abstract_col="abstract",
year_col="year",
)
print(f"Imported {project.total_papers} papers")
from lattereview.agents import ScreeningAgent
# Configure screening agent
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
criteria=project.inclusion_criteria,
exclusion=project.exclusion_criteria,
)
# Title/abstract screening
results = screener.screen(
project.papers,
mode="title_abstract",
confidence_threshold=0.7,
)
# Results include: decision, confidence, reasoning
for paper in results[:3]:
print(f"{paper.title}")
print(f" Decision: {paper.decision} "
f"(confidence: {paper.confidence:.2f})")
print(f" Reason: {paper.reasoning}")
from lattereview.agents import ExtractionAgent
extractor = ExtractionAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
fields={
"architecture": "Deep learning architecture used",
"dataset": "Medical imaging dataset",
"modality": "Imaging modality (CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.)",
"dice_score": "Best Dice similarity coefficient reported",
"sample_size": "Number of images/patients",
},
)
extracted = extractor.extract(project.included_papers)
# Export structured data
extracted.to_csv("extracted_data.csv")
# PRISMA flow diagram
project.generate_prisma_diagram("prisma.png")
# Summary statistics
summary = project.summarize()
print(f"Screened: {summary['screened']}")
print(f"Included: {summary['included']}")
print(f"Excluded: {summary['excluded']}")
# Use different LLM providers
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="openai",
model="gpt-4o",
)
# Local models via Ollama
screener = ScreeningAgent(
llm_provider="ollama",
model="llama3",
base_url="http://localhost:11434",
)
# Simulate dual-reviewer screening for reliability
results = screener.dual_screen(
project.papers,
models=["claude-sonnet-4-20250514", "gpt-4o"],
agreement_threshold=0.8,
)
# Papers with disagreement flagged for human review
conflicts = [p for p in results if p.agreement < 0.8]
print(f"{len(conflicts)} papers need human adjudication")
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.