skills/60-regisely-superpapers/skills/journal-guidelines/SKILL.md
Use when preparing a paper for submission to a specific journal, checking formatting requirements, parsing instructions for authors, building a submission checklist, or adapting a paper to a journal template. Fetches the journal's official guidelines via web and produces a verifiable checklist.
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research journal-guidelinesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill fetches instructions for authors from the journal's official page, parses them into a structured submission checklist, and adapts the paper to the journal's template when one is provided. Every guideline comes from a live web fetch — cached or remembered guidelines are forbidden. Journals update formatting requirements, policies on replication packages, and blinding rules frequently; stale information leads to desk rejections.
Fetch the journal's instructions for authors via web fetch on the official URL. Never rely on memory or cached knowledge. If the journal publishes its guidelines in multiple places (website, style guide PDF, author portal), fetch all of them.
Parse key requirements into a structured list:
.tex, .docx, .pdf; Editorial Manager, ScholarOne, OJSProduce a checklist in markdown with each requirement as a verifiable item. Each item must be actionable — "reduce word count to 8,000" is actionable, "check length" is not.
If the journal provides a LaTeX template: download it via web, adapt the paper to the template's structure, map existing \input{} table calls to the template's expectations, preserve the bibliography.
If no template: adjust the existing paper — margins, font, spacing, citation style — to meet the requirements without breaking the replication pipeline.
Verify compliance item-by-item before declaring the paper ready. Run through the checklist mechanically and mark each item. Do not self-certify based on "looks about right".
Ensure the manuscript contains end-matter sections. The following sections must appear after the conclusion, before the references, unless the journal template specifies a different placement:
## Submission Checklist — Journal of Applied Econometrics
- [ ] Manuscript under 8,000 words excluding references (current: 7,421)
- [ ] Abstract under 150 words (current: 148)
- [ ] Harvard citation style (using `biblatex` authoryear — OK)
- [ ] Double-blind: remove author names and affiliations from title page
- [ ] Double-blind: move acknowledgments to a separate file (not in manuscript)
- [ ] Figures as vector PDF, embedded in text at relevant locations
- [ ] Tables numbered consecutively, notes below table
- [ ] Data and code deposit with replication package (Dataverse acceptable)
- [ ] Cover letter: significance statement + 3 suggested referees + non-exclusivity declaration
- [ ] CRediT author contribution statement
- [ ] Data availability statement in a dedicated section before references
- [ ] ORCID for all authors
- [ ] Submit via Editorial Manager: https://www.editorialmanager.com/jae/
.docx when the journal requires .tex, or vice versa.tex filetools
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
tools
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
tools
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
tools
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".