skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/funding/grant-writing-guide/SKILL.md
Write competitive research proposals with clear objectives and budgets
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research grant-writing-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for preparing competitive research grant proposals. Covers proposal structure, writing strategies, budget preparation, and common evaluation criteria used by major funding agencies (NSF, NIH, ERC, NSFC).
Most funding agencies require these core components:
1. Cover Page / Project Summary (1 page)
- Title (concise, descriptive, no jargon)
- PI name, institution, co-PIs
- Total budget and duration
- Abstract (250 words)
- Keywords (5-8)
2. Project Description / Research Plan (10-15 pages typically)
a. Introduction and Background
b. Specific Aims / Research Questions
c. Research Design and Methods
d. Timeline and Milestones
e. Expected Outcomes and Significance
f. Broader Impacts (NSF) / Societal Relevance
3. Literature Cited / References
4. Budget and Budget Justification
5. Biographical Sketches / CVs
6. Data Management Plan
7. Facilities and Equipment
8. Supplementary Materials (letters of support, etc.)
The specific aims page is the most important page of any NIH-style proposal. Reviewers often form their opinion based on this page alone.
def specific_aims_template(project_info: dict) -> str:
"""
Generate a specific aims page structure.
Args:
project_info: Dict with 'problem', 'gap', 'approach', 'aims', 'impact'
"""
template = f"""
SPECIFIC AIMS
[Opening paragraph: The big picture problem]
{project_info['problem']}
[Gap paragraph: What is unknown/unsolved]
{project_info['gap']}
[Approach paragraph: What will you do and why]
{project_info['approach']}
The long-term goal of this research is [long-term vision].
The objective of this proposal is [specific objective].
The central hypothesis is [testable hypothesis],
based on [preliminary data / rationale].
The following specific aims will test this hypothesis:
Aim 1: {project_info['aims'][0]['title']}
{project_info['aims'][0]['description']}
Hypothesis: {project_info['aims'][0]['hypothesis']}
Aim 2: {project_info['aims'][1]['title']}
{project_info['aims'][1]['description']}
Hypothesis: {project_info['aims'][1]['hypothesis']}
[Impact paragraph]
{project_info['impact']}
"""
return template
def create_budget(personnel: list[dict], equipment: list[dict],
travel: list[dict], other: list[dict],
indirect_rate: float = 0.55,
years: int = 3) -> dict:
"""
Create a research budget with indirect costs.
Args:
personnel: List of {'role', 'salary', 'effort_pct', 'fringe_rate'}
equipment: List of {'item', 'cost'}
travel: List of {'purpose', 'cost_per_year'}
other: List of {'item', 'cost_per_year'}
indirect_rate: F&A rate (decimal)
years: Project duration in years
"""
budget = {'years': {}}
for year in range(1, years + 1):
year_budget = {'categories': {}}
# Personnel (with annual salary increases of 3%)
personnel_total = 0
for person in personnel:
salary = person['salary'] * (1.03 ** (year - 1))
cost = salary * person['effort_pct'] / 100
fringe = cost * person['fringe_rate']
personnel_total += cost + fringe
year_budget['categories']['personnel'] = round(personnel_total)
# Equipment (Year 1 only for major items)
equip_total = sum(e['cost'] for e in equipment) if year == 1 else 0
year_budget['categories']['equipment'] = equip_total
# Travel
travel_total = sum(t['cost_per_year'] for t in travel)
year_budget['categories']['travel'] = travel_total
# Other direct costs
other_total = sum(o['cost_per_year'] for o in other)
year_budget['categories']['other'] = other_total
# Modified total direct costs (MTDC excludes equipment >$5000)
mtdc = personnel_total + travel_total + other_total
if equip_total < 5000:
mtdc += equip_total
# Indirect costs
indirect = mtdc * indirect_rate
year_budget['categories']['indirect'] = round(indirect)
year_budget['direct_total'] = round(
personnel_total + equip_total + travel_total + other_total
)
year_budget['total'] = round(
year_budget['direct_total'] + indirect
)
budget['years'][year] = year_budget
budget['grand_total'] = sum(y['total'] for y in budget['years'].values())
return budget
# Example budget
budget = create_budget(
personnel=[
{'role': 'PI', 'salary': 120000, 'effort_pct': 20, 'fringe_rate': 0.30},
{'role': 'Postdoc', 'salary': 56000, 'effort_pct': 100, 'fringe_rate': 0.25},
{'role': 'PhD Student', 'salary': 34000, 'effort_pct': 50, 'fringe_rate': 0.10}
],
equipment=[{'item': 'GPU server', 'cost': 15000}],
travel=[{'purpose': 'Conference attendance', 'cost_per_year': 3000}],
other=[
{'item': 'Publication charges', 'cost_per_year': 2000},
{'item': 'Cloud computing', 'cost_per_year': 5000}
],
indirect_rate=0.55,
years=3
)
| Criterion | Weight | Key Questions | |-----------|--------|---------------| | Intellectual Merit | ~50% | Does it advance knowledge? Is the approach sound? | | Broader Impacts | ~50% | Societal benefit? Education? Diversity? Infrastructure? |
| Criterion | Key Questions | |-----------|---------------| | Significance | Does it address an important problem? | | Investigator(s) | Are PI and team qualified? | | Innovation | Novel approaches or concepts? | | Approach | Is the strategy well-reasoned and feasible? | | Environment | Does the institution support the work? |
def create_project_timeline(aims: list[dict], total_months: int = 36) -> list[dict]:
"""Create a project timeline for a grant proposal."""
timeline = []
for aim in aims:
for task in aim['tasks']:
timeline.append({
'aim': aim['name'],
'task': task['name'],
'start_month': task['start'],
'end_month': task['end'],
'milestone': task.get('milestone', ''),
'deliverable': task.get('deliverable', '')
})
return timeline
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.