brycewang-stanford/grad-school-guide
skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/methodology/grad-school-guide/SKILL.md
Practical advice for thriving in PhD programs and academic research
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research grad-school-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 20, 2026, 4:22 AM9.6s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- grad-school-guide
- description:
- Practical advice for thriving in PhD programs and academic research
- emoji:
- 🎓
- category:
- research
- subcategory:
- methodology
- keywords:
- ["research question formulation", "hypothesis formulation", "theoretical framework", "conceptual model"]
- source:
- https://github.com/poloclub/awesome-grad-school
Graduate School Research Guide
Overview
Graduate school -- particularly a PhD program -- is a multi-year commitment that demands not only technical skills but also effective research methodology, advisor management, paper writing strategies, and career planning. The difference between thriving and merely surviving often comes down to having the right mental models and practical frameworks for the research process.
This guide distills wisdom from the awesome-grad-school repository (450+ stars, maintained by the Polo Club of Data Science at Georgia Tech) and supplements it with actionable frameworks for formulating research questions, developing hypotheses, structuring a theoretical framework, and managing the end-to-end research lifecycle. The advice here applies broadly across STEM and social-science disciplines.
Whether you are an incoming PhD student, a mid-program researcher seeking to improve your productivity, or an advanced candidate preparing for the job market, this skill provides concrete tools for each stage of the journey.
Formulating Research Questions
A strong research question is the foundation of any good paper. It should be specific, answerable, and significant.
The FINER Criteria
| Criterion | Description | Example Check | |-----------|-------------|---------------| | Feasible | Can be answered with available resources | Do you have the data, compute, and time? | | Interesting | Engages the research community | Would peers read this at a top venue? | | Novel | Not already answered | Has OpenAlex/CrossRef search been done? | | Ethical | Follows research ethics standards | Does it require IRB approval? | | Relevant | Advances the field meaningfully | Does it connect to open problems? |
From Topic to Question: A Step-by-Step Process
- Survey the landscape. Read 20-30 recent papers in your area.
- Identify gaps. Look for "future work" sections and limitations.
- Narrow progressively. Topic -> Sub-topic -> Specific question.
- Phrase as a question. "Does X improve Y compared to Z in context W?"
- Test with the "so what?" check. If the answer is yes or no, does it matter?
Example progression:
Topic: Natural language processing
Sub-topic: Low-resource language translation
Gap: Few-shot methods underperform on morphologically rich languages
Question: Can morphological decomposition improve few-shot translation
quality for agglutinative languages?
Developing Hypotheses and Theoretical Frameworks
From Question to Hypothesis
A hypothesis is a testable, falsifiable prediction derived from your research question:
- Directional: "Method A will achieve higher BLEU scores than Method B on agglutinative language pairs."
- Non-directional: "There will be a significant difference in BLEU scores between Method A and Method B."
- Null (H0): "There is no significant difference in BLEU scores between Method A and Method B."
Building a Conceptual Model
A conceptual model maps the relationships between your key variables:
Independent Variable Moderator Dependent Variable
[Morphological [Language [Translation
Decomposition] ------> Typology] -----> Quality (BLEU)]
| ^
| Mediator |
+-------> [Vocabulary |
Coverage] --------------------+
Document your conceptual model with:
- Constructs: The abstract concepts (e.g., "translation quality").
- Operationalizations: How you measure each construct (e.g., BLEU, COMET scores).
- Relationships: Hypothesized causal or correlational links.
- Boundary conditions: Where the model applies and where it does not.
Managing Your Advisor and Research Workflow
Communication Frameworks
The Weekly Update Email:
Subject: Weekly Update - [Your Name] - Week of [Date]
1. ACCOMPLISHED THIS WEEK
- Completed experiment X with results Y
- Drafted Section 3 of the paper
2. BLOCKERS
- Need access to GPU cluster for large-scale runs
- Waiting on co-author feedback on Section 2
3. PLAN FOR NEXT WEEK
- Run ablation study on components A, B, C
- Begin writing Section 4
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR MEETING
- Should we include dataset Z in our evaluation?
- Timeline for submission to [Conference]
Research Productivity System
| Practice | Cadence | Tool | |----------|---------|------| | Daily progress log | End of each day | Plain text file or Notion | | Literature reading | 2-3 papers/week | Zotero + annotations | | Experiment tracking | Per run | Weights & Biases or MLflow | | Writing | 30 min daily minimum | LaTeX or Markdown | | Advisor meeting prep | Weekly | Structured update email | | Research talks | Monthly (lab meeting) | 15-min presentation |
Paper Writing Strategy
The Reverse-Outline Method
- Write bullet points for each section (1-2 sentences per paragraph).
- Order bullets by logical flow.
- Expand each bullet into a full paragraph.
- Revise for transitions and coherence.
Section-by-Section Tips
- Introduction: Open with a concrete problem, not "In recent years..."
- Related Work: Organize by theme, not chronologically. Compare approaches, do not just list them.
- Methods: Write so a competent researcher can reproduce your work.
- Results: Lead with the most important finding. Use tables for exact numbers, figures for trends.
- Discussion: Address limitations honestly. Reviewers respect self-awareness.
Handling Rejection
Paper rejection is a normal part of academic life. The awesome-grad-school community recommends:
- Allow 24-48 hours to process emotions. Do not respond immediately.
- Categorize each review comment as: (a) valid and fixable, (b) valid but requires new experiments, (c) misunderstanding to clarify, or (d) subjective disagreement.
- Create an action plan for addressing category (a) and (b) items.
- Resubmit to the next venue with improvements, not just the same paper.
Career Planning
Timeline for a 5-Year PhD
| Year | Focus | Milestones | |------|-------|-----------| | 1 | Coursework + exploration | Pass qualifying exam, identify area | | 2 | First project + first paper | Submit to workshop or conference | | 3 | Core research + publications | 1-2 papers at top venues | | 4 | Thesis writing + job market prep | Draft thesis proposal, internship | | 5 | Defense + job search | Submit thesis, interview |
Building Visibility
- Maintain a personal academic website with publications and blog posts.
- Present at conferences and workshops.
- Share preprints on arXiv before publication.
- Engage constructively on academic social media.
Best Practices
- Start writing early. The paper is not separate from the research -- writing clarifies thinking.
- Build a library of reusable code. Experiment templates, plotting scripts, and data loaders save hours on each project.
- Invest in relationships. Collaborators, mentors, and peers are your most valuable resource.
- Take care of your health. PhD burnout is real. Set boundaries and maintain activities outside research.
- Read broadly. Some of the best ideas come from adjacent fields.
- Track your accomplishments. Maintain a running CV and a "brag document" for annual reviews and job applications.
References
- awesome-grad-school -- Curated grad school advice (450+ stars)
- A Survival Guide to a PhD -- Andrej Karpathy
- Modest Advice for New Graduate Students -- Stephen Stearns, Yale
- De-Mystifying Good Research -- Fei-Fei Li
- How to Write a Great Research Paper -- Simon Peyton Jones
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/thematic-analysis
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/slr-prisma
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-placebo-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-causalpy-experiments
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026