skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/search/google-scholar-guide/SKILL.md
Advanced Google Scholar search techniques for comprehensive literature discovery
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research google-scholar-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for leveraging Google Scholar's full capabilities for academic literature search. Covers advanced search operators, citation tracking, alert configuration, and strategies for systematic and comprehensive retrieval.
| Operator | Syntax | Example | Effect |
|----------|--------|---------|--------|
| Exact phrase | "..." | "machine learning" | Matches exact phrase |
| OR | OR | "deep learning" OR "neural network" | Matches either term |
| Exclude | - | transformer -electrical | Excludes term |
| Author | author: | author:"Y LeCun" | Filter by author |
| Source | source: | source:"Nature" | Filter by journal |
| Title only | intitle: | intitle:"attention mechanism" | Search in title only |
| Date range | Custom range | Via Advanced Search UI | Limit publication years |
| File type | filetype: | filetype:pdf | Specific file formats |
def build_scholar_query(concepts: list[list[str]], exclude: list[str] = None,
title_only: bool = False, author: str = None,
source: str = None) -> str:
"""
Build a structured Google Scholar query from concept groups.
Args:
concepts: List of concept groups, each a list of synonyms
Groups are ANDed together, synonyms are ORed
exclude: Terms to exclude
title_only: Search in title only
author: Author name filter
source: Journal/source filter
Returns:
Formatted Google Scholar query string
"""
# Build concept groups with OR
groups = []
for concept_group in concepts:
if len(concept_group) == 1:
groups.append(f'"{concept_group[0]}"')
else:
terms = ' OR '.join(f'"{term}"' for term in concept_group)
groups.append(f'({terms})')
# AND the concept groups together
query = ' '.join(groups)
# Apply title restriction
if title_only:
query = f'intitle:{query}'
# Add exclusions
if exclude:
for term in exclude:
query += f' -{term}'
# Add author filter
if author:
query += f' author:"{author}"'
# Add source filter
if source:
query += f' source:"{source}"'
return query
# Example: find papers on transfer learning for medical imaging
query = build_scholar_query(
concepts=[
["transfer learning", "domain adaptation", "fine-tuning"],
["medical imaging", "radiology", "pathology images"],
["deep learning", "convolutional neural network"]
],
exclude=["survey", "review"],
title_only=False
)
print(query)
# Output: ("transfer learning" OR "domain adaptation" OR "fine-tuning")
# ("medical imaging" OR "radiology" OR "pathology images")
# ("deep learning" OR "convolutional neural network") -survey -review
Seed Paper (a highly relevant paper you already know)
|
+--> "Cited by" link -> Forward citation tracking
| (who cited this paper? newer related work)
|
+--> Reference list -> Backward citation tracking
(what did this paper cite? foundational work)
Repeat for each highly relevant paper found.
Stop when you reach saturation (no new relevant papers appearing).
Use citation metrics strategically:
def identify_key_papers(search_results: list[dict],
min_citations: int = 10) -> list[dict]:
"""
Identify key papers from search results using citation analysis.
Args:
search_results: List of papers with 'title', 'year', 'citations'
min_citations: Minimum citation threshold
"""
import datetime
current_year = datetime.datetime.now().year
for paper in search_results:
age = max(1, current_year - paper['year'])
paper['citations_per_year'] = paper['citations'] / age
# Classify influence
if paper['citations_per_year'] > 50:
paper['influence'] = 'landmark'
elif paper['citations_per_year'] > 20:
paper['influence'] = 'highly_influential'
elif paper['citations_per_year'] > 5:
paper['influence'] = 'influential'
else:
paper['influence'] = 'standard'
# Filter and sort
filtered = [p for p in search_results if p['citations'] >= min_citations]
return sorted(filtered, key=lambda x: x['citations_per_year'], reverse=True)
Set up alerts to stay current:
Best practices for alerts:
Google Scholar has known limitations:
For systematic reviews, always supplement Google Scholar with structured databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and domain-specific databases (e.g., IEEE Xplore, PsycINFO, EconLit). Document the number of results from each database for your PRISMA flow diagram.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.