skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/pharma/drug-development-guide/SKILL.md
End-to-end drug development pipeline from target identification to regulatory...
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research drug-development-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A comprehensive skill covering the drug development pipeline from target identification through regulatory approval. Designed for pharmaceutical researchers, medicinal chemists, and clinical scientists conducting academic or industry research.
Target ID -> Hit Finding -> Lead Optimization -> Preclinical -> Phase I -> Phase II -> Phase III -> Regulatory Filing
(1-2 yr) (1-2 yr) (1-3 yr) (1-2 yr) (1 yr) (2 yr) (3 yr) (1-2 yr)
Total timeline: ~10-15 years | Success rate: ~5-10% from Phase I to approval
Estimated cost: $1.3B-$2.8B per approved drug (DiMasi et al., 2016)
import pandas as pd
from scipy import stats
def differential_expression_analysis(expression_data: pd.DataFrame,
disease_group: list[str],
control_group: list[str],
fdr_threshold: float = 0.05) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Identify differentially expressed genes as potential drug targets.
Args:
expression_data: Gene x Sample expression matrix
disease_group: Sample IDs in disease condition
control_group: Sample IDs in control condition
fdr_threshold: False discovery rate threshold
"""
results = []
for gene in expression_data.index:
disease_vals = expression_data.loc[gene, disease_group]
control_vals = expression_data.loc[gene, control_group]
t_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(disease_vals, control_vals)
fold_change = disease_vals.mean() / (control_vals.mean() + 1e-10)
results.append({
'gene': gene,
'fold_change': fold_change,
'log2_fc': np.log2(abs(fold_change) + 1e-10),
'p_value': p_value,
't_statistic': t_stat
})
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
# Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
df['fdr'] = multipletests(df['p_value'], method='fdr_bh')[1]
df['significant'] = df['fdr'] < fdr_threshold
return df.sort_values('fdr')
A robust drug target should satisfy multiple criteria:
| Criterion | Method | Evidence Strength | |-----------|--------|------------------| | Genetic association | GWAS, Mendelian randomization | Strong | | Expression in disease tissue | RNA-seq, immunohistochemistry | Moderate | | Functional role | CRISPR knockout, siRNA | Strong | | Druggability | Structural analysis, binding pockets | Essential | | Safety (anti-target) | Phenotype of loss-of-function mutations | Essential |
Assess absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity early:
def lipinski_rule_of_five(molecular_weight: float, logp: float,
hbd: int, hba: int) -> dict:
"""
Evaluate Lipinski's Rule of Five for oral bioavailability.
Args:
molecular_weight: Molecular weight in Da
logp: Calculated LogP (lipophilicity)
hbd: Number of hydrogen bond donors
hba: Number of hydrogen bond acceptors
"""
violations = 0
details = []
if molecular_weight > 500:
violations += 1
details.append(f"MW {molecular_weight} > 500")
if logp > 5:
violations += 1
details.append(f"LogP {logp} > 5")
if hbd > 5:
violations += 1
details.append(f"HBD {hbd} > 5")
if hba > 10:
violations += 1
details.append(f"HBA {hba} > 10")
return {
'violations': violations,
'passes': violations <= 1,
'details': details,
'assessment': 'Likely orally bioavailable' if violations <= 1
else 'Poor oral bioavailability expected'
}
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def one_compartment_iv(t, dose, V, CL):
"""One-compartment IV bolus model."""
k_el = CL / V
return (dose / V) * np.exp(-k_el * t)
def compute_pk_parameters(time_points: np.ndarray,
concentrations: np.ndarray,
dose: float) -> dict:
"""
Fit one-compartment model and derive PK parameters.
"""
popt, pcov = curve_fit(
lambda t, V, CL: one_compartment_iv(t, dose, V, CL),
time_points, concentrations,
p0=[10, 1], bounds=(0, [1000, 100])
)
V, CL = popt
t_half = 0.693 * V / CL
auc = dose / CL
return {
'volume_of_distribution_L': round(V, 2),
'clearance_L_hr': round(CL, 2),
'half_life_hr': round(t_half, 2),
'AUC_mg_hr_L': round(auc, 2)
}
| Phase | Primary Goal | Typical N | Key Endpoints | |-------|-------------|-----------|---------------| | Phase I | Safety, dose finding | 20-80 | MTD, DLT, PK | | Phase II | Efficacy signal | 100-300 | ORR, PFS, biomarkers | | Phase III | Confirmatory efficacy | 300-3000 | OS, PFS, PROs | | Phase IV | Post-marketing surveillance | 1000+ | ADRs, real-world effectiveness |
Always pre-register clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and follow CONSORT guidelines for reporting. Use adaptive trial designs (e.g., Bayesian adaptive randomization, seamless Phase II/III) when appropriate to improve efficiency.
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.