skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/cs/distributed-systems-guide/SKILL.md
Distributed systems design patterns and analysis for CS research
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research distributed-systems-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for researching and designing distributed systems, covering consensus algorithms, replication strategies, consistency models, fault tolerance, and performance analysis. Provides theoretical foundations and practical implementations relevant to systems research.
Strongest
| Linearizability (atomic, real-time ordering)
| Sequential consistency (program order respected)
| Causal consistency (causally related ops ordered)
| PRAM / FIFO consistency (per-process order)
| Eventual consistency (converges if updates stop)
Weakest
The CAP theorem states that during a network partition, a distributed system must choose between consistency and availability:
| System | Partition Behavior | Normal Behavior | Classification | |--------|-------------------|----------------|----------------| | ZooKeeper | Consistent (sacrifice A) | Low latency, consistent | CP / PC/EC | | Cassandra | Available (sacrifice C) | Low latency, eventual | AP / PA/EL | | Spanner | Consistent (sacrifice A) | Higher latency, consistent | CP / PC/EC | | DynamoDB | Configurable per-read | Tunable consistency | AP or CP | | CockroachDB | Consistent (sacrifice A) | Serializable | CP / PC/EC |
from enum import Enum
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
import random
class NodeState(Enum):
FOLLOWER = "follower"
CANDIDATE = "candidate"
LEADER = "leader"
@dataclass
class LogEntry:
term: int
index: int
command: str
@dataclass
class RaftNode:
"""
Simplified Raft consensus node for educational purposes.
Implements leader election and log replication state machine.
"""
node_id: str
state: NodeState = NodeState.FOLLOWER
current_term: int = 0
voted_for: str = None
log: list = field(default_factory=list)
commit_index: int = 0
last_applied: int = 0
# Leader state
next_index: dict = field(default_factory=dict)
match_index: dict = field(default_factory=dict)
def start_election(self, peers: list[str]) -> dict:
"""Transition to candidate and request votes."""
self.state = NodeState.CANDIDATE
self.current_term += 1
self.voted_for = self.node_id
last_log_index = len(self.log) - 1 if self.log else -1
last_log_term = self.log[-1].term if self.log else 0
return {
"type": "RequestVote",
"term": self.current_term,
"candidate_id": self.node_id,
"last_log_index": last_log_index,
"last_log_term": last_log_term,
}
def handle_vote_request(self, term: int, candidate_id: str,
last_log_index: int,
last_log_term: int) -> dict:
"""Process a RequestVote RPC."""
if term < self.current_term:
return {"term": self.current_term, "vote_granted": False}
if term > self.current_term:
self.current_term = term
self.state = NodeState.FOLLOWER
self.voted_for = None
# Check if candidate's log is at least as up-to-date
my_last_term = self.log[-1].term if self.log else 0
my_last_index = len(self.log) - 1 if self.log else -1
log_ok = (last_log_term > my_last_term or
(last_log_term == my_last_term and
last_log_index >= my_last_index))
vote_granted = (
(self.voted_for is None or self.voted_for == candidate_id)
and log_ok
)
if vote_granted:
self.voted_for = candidate_id
return {"term": self.current_term, "vote_granted": vote_granted}
def append_entry(self, command: str) -> LogEntry:
"""Leader appends a new entry to its log."""
entry = LogEntry(
term=self.current_term,
index=len(self.log),
command=command,
)
self.log.append(entry)
return entry
| Algorithm | Fault Model | Tolerance | Rounds | Complexity | |-----------|-------------|-----------|--------|------------| | Paxos | Crash faults | f < n/2 | 2 (normal) | Difficult to implement correctly | | Raft | Crash faults | f < n/2 | 2 (normal) | Designed for understandability | | PBFT | Byzantine faults | f < n/3 | 3 | O(n^2) message complexity | | HotStuff | Byzantine faults | f < n/3 | 3 | O(n) with pipelining |
class ReplicatedStateMachine:
"""
State machine replication with configurable consistency.
Demonstrates read/write quorum intersection for correctness.
"""
def __init__(self, n_replicas: int, read_quorum: int = None,
write_quorum: int = None):
self.n = n_replicas
self.R = read_quorum or (n_replicas // 2 + 1)
self.W = write_quorum or (n_replicas // 2 + 1)
# Quorum intersection guarantees: R + W > N
assert self.R + self.W > self.n, (
f"Quorum intersection violated: R({self.R}) + W({self.W}) "
f"must be > N({self.n})"
)
self.replicas = [{} for _ in range(n_replicas)]
self.version_clock = 0
def write(self, key: str, value: str) -> dict:
"""Write to W replicas."""
self.version_clock += 1
# Select W replicas (in practice, based on availability)
targets = random.sample(range(self.n), self.W)
for i in targets:
self.replicas[i][key] = (value, self.version_clock)
return {
"key": key,
"version": self.version_clock,
"acked_by": len(targets),
"quorum_met": True,
}
def read(self, key: str) -> dict:
"""Read from R replicas, return latest version."""
targets = random.sample(range(self.n), self.R)
responses = []
for i in targets:
if key in self.replicas[i]:
responses.append(self.replicas[i][key])
if not responses:
return {"key": key, "value": None, "found": False}
# Return the value with the highest version
latest = max(responses, key=lambda x: x[1])
return {
"key": key,
"value": latest[0],
"version": latest[1],
"found": True,
}
class VectorClock:
"""Vector clock for tracking causality in distributed systems."""
def __init__(self, process_id: str, processes: list[str]):
self.pid = process_id
self.clock = {p: 0 for p in processes}
def increment(self):
"""Local event: increment own counter."""
self.clock[self.pid] += 1
def send(self) -> dict:
"""Prepare clock for sending with a message."""
self.increment()
return dict(self.clock)
def receive(self, other_clock: dict):
"""Merge received clock: element-wise max, then increment."""
for p in self.clock:
self.clock[p] = max(self.clock[p], other_clock.get(p, 0))
self.increment()
def happened_before(self, other: dict) -> bool:
"""Check if this clock happened-before other (causal ordering)."""
return (all(self.clock[p] <= other.get(p, 0) for p in self.clock) and
any(self.clock[p] < other.get(p, 0) for p in self.clock))
Key metrics for evaluating distributed systems:
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.