skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/automation/datagen-research-guide/SKILL.md
AI-driven multi-agent research assistant for end-to-end studies
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research datagen-research-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for orchestrating AI-driven multi-agent research workflows that handle literature review, hypothesis generation, experiment design, data analysis, and report writing. Based on the DATAGEN project (2K stars), this skill provides structured guidance on building automated research pipelines using collaborative agent architectures.
Modern research increasingly benefits from AI assistance at every stage. DATAGEN's approach uses multiple specialized agents that collaborate on a research task, each handling a different aspect of the workflow. This skill teaches the agent how to coordinate such multi-agent pipelines, ensuring quality control at each handoff point and maintaining scientific rigor throughout.
The multi-agent paradigm is particularly powerful for research tasks that span multiple competencies: a literature agent gathers relevant prior work, a methodology agent designs appropriate experiments, a data agent handles collection and cleaning, an analysis agent runs statistical tests, and a writing agent produces publication-ready text.
The research pipeline employs these specialized agent roles:
Literature Agent
Hypothesis Agent
Experiment Agent
Analysis Agent
Writing Agent
Coordinating multiple agents requires careful orchestration:
Task Decomposition
Quality Control
Error Recovery
The DATAGEN approach excels at synthetic data generation for research:
This skill adapts to multiple research contexts:
Social Sciences - Survey design, factor analysis, structural equation modeling Natural Sciences - Experimental protocols, measurement validation, replication studies Computer Science - Benchmark design, ablation studies, performance evaluation Health Sciences - Clinical trial design, meta-analysis, systematic reviews Engineering - Design of experiments, optimization, reliability testing
This skill coordinates with other Research-Claw capabilities:
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.