skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/automation/data-collection-automation/SKILL.md
Automate survey deployment, data collection, and pipeline management
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research data-collection-automationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for automating research data collection, survey deployment, and data pipeline management. Covers survey platform APIs, automated data retrieval, quality checks, ETL pipelines, and scheduling for longitudinal studies.
import os
import json
import urllib.request
import time
def export_qualtrics_responses(survey_id: str,
file_format: str = "csv") -> str:
"""
Export survey responses from Qualtrics via API.
Args:
survey_id: The Qualtrics survey ID (SV_...)
file_format: Export format (csv, json, spss)
"""
api_token = os.environ["QUALTRICS_API_TOKEN"]
data_center = os.environ["QUALTRICS_DATACENTER"]
base_url = f"https://{data_center}.qualtrics.com/API/v3"
headers = {
"X-API-TOKEN": api_token,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
# Step 1: Start export
export_data = json.dumps({
"format": file_format,
"compress": False
}).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses",
data=export_data,
headers=headers
)
response = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
progress_id = response["result"]["progressId"]
# Step 2: Poll for completion
status = "inProgress"
while status == "inProgress":
time.sleep(2)
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{progress_id}",
headers=headers
)
check = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
status = check["result"]["status"]
file_id = check["result"]["fileId"]
# Step 3: Download file
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{file_id}/file",
headers=headers
)
file_data = urllib.request.urlopen(req).read()
output_path = f"responses_{survey_id}.{file_format}"
with open(output_path, "wb") as f:
f.write(file_data)
return output_path
def export_redcap_records(api_url: str, fields: list[str] = None) -> list:
"""
Export records from a REDCap project.
Args:
api_url: REDCap API endpoint URL
fields: List of field names to export (None = all fields)
"""
api_token = os.environ["REDCAP_API_TOKEN"]
data = {
"token": api_token,
"content": "record",
"format": "json",
"type": "flat"
}
if fields:
data["fields"] = ",".join(fields)
encoded = urllib.parse.urlencode(data).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(api_url, data=encoded)
response = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
return json.loads(response.read())
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
def validate_survey_data(df: pd.DataFrame,
rules: dict) -> dict:
"""
Run automated data quality checks on collected data.
Args:
df: DataFrame of survey responses
rules: Dict of column -> validation rule pairs
"""
issues = []
# Check for duplicates
dupes = df.duplicated(subset=["respondent_id"]).sum()
if dupes > 0:
issues.append(f"Found {dupes} duplicate respondent IDs")
# Check completion rates
completion = df.notna().mean()
low_completion = completion[completion < 0.5]
for col in low_completion.index:
issues.append(f"Column '{col}' has {low_completion[col]:.0%} completion")
# Check value ranges
for col, rule in rules.items():
if col not in df.columns:
continue
if "min" in rule:
violations = (df[col] < rule["min"]).sum()
if violations > 0:
issues.append(f"{violations} values below minimum in '{col}'")
if "max" in rule:
violations = (df[col] > rule["max"]).sum()
if violations > 0:
issues.append(f"{violations} values above maximum in '{col}'")
# Check for speeding (unusually fast completion)
if "duration_seconds" in df.columns:
median_time = df["duration_seconds"].median()
speeders = (df["duration_seconds"] < median_time * 0.3).sum()
if speeders > 0:
issues.append(f"{speeders} respondents completed in <30% of median time")
return {
"n_records": len(df),
"n_issues": len(issues),
"issues": issues,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()
}
def research_etl_pipeline(sources: list[dict],
output_dir: str) -> dict:
"""
Extract, transform, and load research data from multiple sources.
Args:
sources: List of data source configurations
output_dir: Directory to save processed data
"""
results = {}
for source in sources:
name = source["name"]
# Extract
if source["type"] == "qualtrics":
raw_path = export_qualtrics_responses(source["survey_id"])
df = pd.read_csv(raw_path)
elif source["type"] == "redcap":
records = export_redcap_records(source["api_url"])
df = pd.DataFrame(records)
elif source["type"] == "csv_url":
df = pd.read_csv(source["url"])
else:
continue
# Transform
df = df.dropna(how="all")
df.columns = [c.strip().lower().replace(" ", "_") for c in df.columns]
# Load
timestamp = datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d")
output_path = f"{output_dir}/{name}_{timestamp}.csv"
df.to_csv(output_path, index=False)
results[name] = {
"records": len(df),
"columns": len(df.columns),
"output": output_path
}
return results
# Run data collection pipeline daily at 6 AM
# crontab -e
0 6 * * * cd /path/to/project && python collect_data.py >> logs/collection.log 2>&1
For longitudinal studies, automate monitoring of:
- Response rates per wave (alert if below threshold)
- Data quality metrics (completion, speeding, straight-lining)
- API quota usage (stay within rate limits)
- Storage usage and backup status
- Participant dropout patterns
Always ensure automated data collection complies with your IRB/ethics board approval. Store API tokens securely using environment variables, never in code. Implement data encryption at rest. Log all data access for audit trails. Respect rate limits on external APIs. Include automated checks for consent status before processing participant data.
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.