skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/automation/data-collection-automation/SKILL.md
Automate survey deployment, data collection, and pipeline management
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research data-collection-automationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for automating research data collection, survey deployment, and data pipeline management. Covers survey platform APIs, automated data retrieval, quality checks, ETL pipelines, and scheduling for longitudinal studies.
import os
import json
import urllib.request
import time
def export_qualtrics_responses(survey_id: str,
file_format: str = "csv") -> str:
"""
Export survey responses from Qualtrics via API.
Args:
survey_id: The Qualtrics survey ID (SV_...)
file_format: Export format (csv, json, spss)
"""
api_token = os.environ["QUALTRICS_API_TOKEN"]
data_center = os.environ["QUALTRICS_DATACENTER"]
base_url = f"https://{data_center}.qualtrics.com/API/v3"
headers = {
"X-API-TOKEN": api_token,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
# Step 1: Start export
export_data = json.dumps({
"format": file_format,
"compress": False
}).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses",
data=export_data,
headers=headers
)
response = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
progress_id = response["result"]["progressId"]
# Step 2: Poll for completion
status = "inProgress"
while status == "inProgress":
time.sleep(2)
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{progress_id}",
headers=headers
)
check = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
status = check["result"]["status"]
file_id = check["result"]["fileId"]
# Step 3: Download file
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{base_url}/surveys/{survey_id}/export-responses/{file_id}/file",
headers=headers
)
file_data = urllib.request.urlopen(req).read()
output_path = f"responses_{survey_id}.{file_format}"
with open(output_path, "wb") as f:
f.write(file_data)
return output_path
def export_redcap_records(api_url: str, fields: list[str] = None) -> list:
"""
Export records from a REDCap project.
Args:
api_url: REDCap API endpoint URL
fields: List of field names to export (None = all fields)
"""
api_token = os.environ["REDCAP_API_TOKEN"]
data = {
"token": api_token,
"content": "record",
"format": "json",
"type": "flat"
}
if fields:
data["fields"] = ",".join(fields)
encoded = urllib.parse.urlencode(data).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(api_url, data=encoded)
response = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
return json.loads(response.read())
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime
def validate_survey_data(df: pd.DataFrame,
rules: dict) -> dict:
"""
Run automated data quality checks on collected data.
Args:
df: DataFrame of survey responses
rules: Dict of column -> validation rule pairs
"""
issues = []
# Check for duplicates
dupes = df.duplicated(subset=["respondent_id"]).sum()
if dupes > 0:
issues.append(f"Found {dupes} duplicate respondent IDs")
# Check completion rates
completion = df.notna().mean()
low_completion = completion[completion < 0.5]
for col in low_completion.index:
issues.append(f"Column '{col}' has {low_completion[col]:.0%} completion")
# Check value ranges
for col, rule in rules.items():
if col not in df.columns:
continue
if "min" in rule:
violations = (df[col] < rule["min"]).sum()
if violations > 0:
issues.append(f"{violations} values below minimum in '{col}'")
if "max" in rule:
violations = (df[col] > rule["max"]).sum()
if violations > 0:
issues.append(f"{violations} values above maximum in '{col}'")
# Check for speeding (unusually fast completion)
if "duration_seconds" in df.columns:
median_time = df["duration_seconds"].median()
speeders = (df["duration_seconds"] < median_time * 0.3).sum()
if speeders > 0:
issues.append(f"{speeders} respondents completed in <30% of median time")
return {
"n_records": len(df),
"n_issues": len(issues),
"issues": issues,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()
}
def research_etl_pipeline(sources: list[dict],
output_dir: str) -> dict:
"""
Extract, transform, and load research data from multiple sources.
Args:
sources: List of data source configurations
output_dir: Directory to save processed data
"""
results = {}
for source in sources:
name = source["name"]
# Extract
if source["type"] == "qualtrics":
raw_path = export_qualtrics_responses(source["survey_id"])
df = pd.read_csv(raw_path)
elif source["type"] == "redcap":
records = export_redcap_records(source["api_url"])
df = pd.DataFrame(records)
elif source["type"] == "csv_url":
df = pd.read_csv(source["url"])
else:
continue
# Transform
df = df.dropna(how="all")
df.columns = [c.strip().lower().replace(" ", "_") for c in df.columns]
# Load
timestamp = datetime.now().strftime("%Y%m%d")
output_path = f"{output_dir}/{name}_{timestamp}.csv"
df.to_csv(output_path, index=False)
results[name] = {
"records": len(df),
"columns": len(df.columns),
"output": output_path
}
return results
# Run data collection pipeline daily at 6 AM
# crontab -e
0 6 * * * cd /path/to/project && python collect_data.py >> logs/collection.log 2>&1
For longitudinal studies, automate monitoring of:
- Response rates per wave (alert if below threshold)
- Data quality metrics (completion, speeding, straight-lining)
- API quota usage (stay within rate limits)
- Storage usage and backup status
- Participant dropout patterns
Always ensure automated data collection complies with your IRB/ethics board approval. Store API tokens securely using environment variables, never in code. Implement data encryption at rest. Log all data access for audit trails. Respect rate limits on external APIs. Include automated checks for consent status before processing participant data.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.