skills/41-sticerd-eee-sewage-econometrics-check/skills/data-analysis/SKILL.md
End-to-end R data analysis for the sewage project. Writes analysis scripts following project conventions (here::here, arrow/parquet, fixest, modelsummary, native pipe), runs code review, and produces publication-ready tables and figures. This skill should be used when asked to "run an analysis", "estimate the model", "add a specification", or "write an R script".
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research data-analysisInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Run an end-to-end data analysis following sewage project conventions.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — a dataset path, analysis goal description, or specification to estimate.
Scripts in scripts/R/09_analysis/ by approach:
01_descriptive/ — Maps, scatter plots, Google Trends02_hedonic/ — Cross-sectional hedonic regressions03_repeat_sales/ — Repeat-transaction regressions04_long_difference/ — 250m grid-level long differences05_news/ — DiD and event studies with media coverage06_upstream_downstream/ — Directional spillover07_dry_spills/ — Dry spill analysisdata/final/ — Analysis-ready datasetsdata/processed/ — Intermediate pipeline outputs (parquet)arrow::read_parquet() or arrow::open_dataset()output/tables/*.tex (modelsummary → LaTeX with tabularray)output/figures/*.pdf or *.pngoutput/regs/*.rdsoutput/html_plots/here::here() for all paths|>fixest::feols() for regressions with vcov = "hetero"modelsummary for table output (tabularray format, [H] placement)arrow for parquet I/Osnake_case namingforcats::as_factor() for factors$ARGUMENTSscripts/R/utils/spill_aggregation_utils.R if spill metrics are involveddata/final/ for available datasetsdocs/overleaf/ if the analysis feeds into the paperFollow the analysis script structure:
# ================================================================
# [Descriptive Title]
# Purpose: [What this script does]
# Inputs: [Data files]
# Outputs: [Figures, tables, RDS files]
# ================================================================
# === 1. Setup ============================================
library(tidyverse)
library(fixest)
library(modelsummary)
library(arrow)
library(here)
# === 2. Data Loading =====================================
df <- read_parquet(here("data", "final", "dataset.parquet"))
# === 3. Main Analysis ====================================
model <- feols(
log_price ~ spill_count | lsoa + year_quarter,
data = df,
vcov = "hetero"
)
# === 4. Tables and Figures ================================
modelsummary(
list("Main" = model),
output = here("output", "tables", "table_name.tex"),
fmt = 3
)
# === 5. Export ============================================
saveRDS(model, here("output", "regs", "model_name.rds"))
After writing the script, review it against the 9 categories from /review-r:
Fix any Critical or Major issues before presenting.
If the user wants execution:
cd /Users/jacopoolivieri/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/01_projects/sewage
Rscript scripts/R/09_analysis/[subdir]/[script_name].R
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.