skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/crossref-event-data-api/SKILL.md
Track scholarly mentions across the web via Crossref Event Data
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research crossref-event-data-apiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Crossref Event Data tracks where scholarly publications are discussed, shared, and referenced across the open web — Wikipedia citations, Twitter/X mentions, Reddit posts, blog references, policy document citations, and more. Unlike traditional citation counts, Event Data captures real-time online attention to research. Free, no authentication required.
https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1
# Get events for a specific DOI
curl "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1/events?obj-id=10.1038/nature14539&rows=20"
# Filter by source
curl "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1/events?\
obj-id=10.1038/nature14539&source=wikipedia"
# Filter by date range
curl "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1/events?\
from-occurred-date=2024-01-01&until-occurred-date=2024-12-31&source=twitter&rows=100"
# Get events about a DOI prefix (publisher level)
curl "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1/events?obj-id.prefix=10.1371&rows=50"
# Events from a specific source
curl "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1/events?source=reddit&rows=50"
| Source | Description | What it tracks |
|--------|-------------|---------------|
| wikipedia | Wikipedia article references | DOIs cited in Wikipedia |
| twitter | Twitter/X posts | Tweets linking to DOIs |
| reddit | Reddit posts/comments | Reddit links to papers |
| hypothesis | Hypothesis annotations | Web annotations on papers |
| newsfeed | News articles | Media coverage of research |
| stackexchange | Stack Exchange Q&A | Technical discussions |
| web | General web pages | Blog posts, reports |
| wordpressdotcom | WordPress blogs | Blog references |
| datacite | DataCite DOIs | Dataset-paper linkages |
| crossref | Crossref metadata | Reference list updates |
| Parameter | Description | Example |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| obj-id | DOI of the paper | obj-id=10.1038/nature14539 |
| obj-id.prefix | DOI prefix (publisher) | obj-id.prefix=10.1371 |
| source | Event source | source=wikipedia |
| from-occurred-date | Events from date | 2024-01-01 |
| until-occurred-date | Events until date | 2024-12-31 |
| rows | Results per page (max 10000) | rows=100 |
| cursor | Pagination cursor | Returned in response |
{
"status": "ok",
"message-type": "event-list",
"message": {
"total-results": 245,
"events": [
{
"obj_id": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539",
"source_id": "wikipedia",
"subj_id": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning",
"relation_type_id": "references",
"occurred_at": "2024-03-15T10:30:00Z",
"subj": {
"title": "Deep learning - Wikipedia",
"url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning"
}
}
],
"next-cursor": "abc123..."
}
}
import requests
from collections import Counter
BASE_URL = "https://api.eventdata.crossref.org/v1"
def get_events(doi: str, source: str = None,
rows: int = 100) -> list:
"""Get Event Data events for a DOI."""
params = {"obj-id": doi, "rows": rows}
if source:
params["source"] = source
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/events", params=params)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
events = []
for ev in data.get("message", {}).get("events", []):
events.append({
"source": ev.get("source_id"),
"subject_url": ev.get("subj_id"),
"subject_title": ev.get("subj", {}).get("title", ""),
"relation": ev.get("relation_type_id"),
"date": ev.get("occurred_at", "")[:10],
})
return events
def get_attention_summary(doi: str) -> dict:
"""Summarize online attention for a paper."""
events = get_events(doi, rows=10000)
source_counts = Counter(e["source"] for e in events)
return {
"total_events": len(events),
"by_source": dict(source_counts),
"first_event": min((e["date"] for e in events), default=None),
"latest_event": max((e["date"] for e in events), default=None),
}
def find_wikipedia_citations(doi: str) -> list:
"""Find Wikipedia articles that cite a paper."""
events = get_events(doi, source="wikipedia")
return [
{"wikipedia_page": e["subject_title"],
"url": e["subject_url"],
"date": e["date"]}
for e in events
if e["relation"] == "references"
]
# Example: analyze online attention for a paper
doi = "10.1038/nature14539"
summary = get_attention_summary(doi)
print(f"Total events: {summary['total_events']}")
for source, count in sorted(summary["by_source"].items(),
key=lambda x: -x[1]):
print(f" {source}: {count}")
# Example: find Wikipedia coverage
wiki_refs = find_wikipedia_citations(doi)
for ref in wiki_refs:
print(f"Cited in: {ref['wikipedia_page']} ({ref['date']})")
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.