skills/41-sticerd-eee-sewage-econometrics-check/skills/create-talk/SKILL.md
Generate Beamer presentations for the sewage-house-prices project by dispatching the Storyteller agent (creator) and Discussant agent (critic). Supports 4 formats — job market, seminar, short, lightning. Derives all content from the paper.
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research create-talkInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generate a Beamer presentation by dispatching the Storyteller (creator) and Discussant (critic).
Input: $ARGUMENTS — format name, optionally followed by paper path.
job-market | seminar | short | lightningdocs/overleaf/_main.tex| Format | Slides | Duration | Content Scope | |--------|--------|----------|---------------| | Job market | 40-50 | 45-60 min | Full story, all results, mechanism, robustness | | Seminar | 25-35 | 30-45 min | Motivation, main result, 2 robustness, conclusion | | Short | 10-15 | 15 min | Question, method, key result, implication | | Lightning | 3-5 | 5 min | Hook, one result, so-what |
Delegate to the storyteller agent via Task tool:
Prompt: Create a [format] talk from [paper].
Read the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex) and extract:
- Research question: causal effect of sewage spills on house prices and rents in England
- Data: EDM (Event Duration Monitoring) spill records 2021-2024+, Land Registry prices, Zoopla rentals
- Identification strategy: hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD/event study
- Spatial matching: spill sites within radius (250m–10km) linked to properties
- Key treatment variables: spill_count, spill_hrs, n_spill_sites, min_dist
- Main results and effect sizes (house prices and rents separately)
- Robustness checks: upstream/downstream, dry spill placebo, rainfall controls
- Institutional context: England's water companies, EDM permit system, regulatory failure
- Key figures: output/figures/, docs/overleaf/figures/, docs/overleaf/maps/
Design narrative arc for [format] format.
Build Beamer .tex file with shared preamble if available.
Compile with XeLaTeX.
Save to docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex
The Storyteller follows these principles:
After Storyteller returns, delegate to the discussant agent:
Prompt: Review the talk at docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex.
Check 5 categories:
1. Narrative flow — does the story build properly from EDM data → identification → results?
2. Visual quality — overflow, readability, consistency
3. Content fidelity — every claim (coefficient, standard error, N) traceable to paper
4. Scope for format — right amount of content for duration
5. Compilation — does it compile cleanly?
Score as advisory (non-blocking).
Save report to docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md
If Discussant finds Critical issues (compilation failures, content not in paper):
.tex file pathSave to docs/conferences/[format]_talk.tex (e.g., docs/conferences/seminar_talk.tex).
Quality report to docs/conferences/quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md.
docs/overleaf/_main.tex.development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.