brycewang-stanford/create-lecture
skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/create-lecture/SKILL.md
Create new Beamer lecture from papers and materials. Guided workflow with notation consistency.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research create-lectureInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 16, 2026, 5:34 PM7.7s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- create-lecture
- description:
- Create new Beamer lecture from papers and materials. Guided workflow with notation consistency.
- argument-hint:
- [Topic name]
- allowed-tools:
- ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Task"]
- context:
- fork
Lecture Creation Workflow
Create a beautiful, pedagogically excellent Beamer lecture deck.
This is a collaborative, iterative process. The instructor drives the vision; Claude is a thinking partner.
CONSTRAINTS (Non-Negotiable)
- Read the knowledge base FIRST — notation registry, narrative arc, applications database
- Every new symbol MUST be checked against the notation registry
- Motivation before formalism — no exceptions
- Worked example within 2 slides of every definition
- Max 2 colored boxes per slide
- No
\pauseor overlay commands (check project rules) - Transition slides at major conceptual pivots
- Thread at least 1 running empirical application throughout
- All citations verified against the bibliography
- Work in batches of 5-10 slides — share for feedback, don't bulk-dump
WORKFLOW
Phase 0: Intake & Context
- Read knowledge base and creation guide
- Inventory provided materials (papers, slides, code)
- Read previous lecture's structure and ending
- State pedagogical goal, get user confirmation
Phase 1: Paper Analysis (When Papers Provided)
- Split into chunks, extract key ideas
- Map paper notation → course notation
- Identify slide-worthy content
- Present summary for approval
Phase 2: Structure Proposal
- Propose outline (5-Act or 3-Part template)
- List TikZ diagrams and R figures needed
- List new notation to introduce
- GATE: User approves before Phase 3
Phase 3: Draft Slides (Iterative)
- Work in batches of 5-10 slides
- Check notation, apply creation patterns
- Quality checks during drafting
Phase 4: Figures & Code
- R scripts following conventions
- TikZ diagrams in Beamer source (single source of truth)
- Save RDS for future Quarto integration
Phase 5: Polish & Compile
- Full 3-pass compilation
- Run Devil's Advocate
- Run Substance Review (if domain reviewer configured)
- Update knowledge base with new notation
Post-Creation Checklist
[ ] Lecture compiles without errors
[ ] No overfull hbox > 10pt
[ ] All citations resolve
[ ] Every definition has motivation + worked example
[ ] Max 2 colored boxes per slide
[ ] 2-3 Socratic questions embedded
[ ] Transition slides between sections
[ ] At least 1 running application threaded throughout
[ ] New notation added to knowledge base
[ ] Session log updated
[ ] Devil's Advocate run
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/literature-review-tools
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文（用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」）。
3,109SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 28, 2026
brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
3,109SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 27, 2026
brycewang-stanford/aer-preregistration
documentation
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
3,021SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 23, 2026
brycewang-stanford/economist-data-skill
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.
3,021SKILL.mdUpdated Jul 23, 2026