skills/54-scdenney-open-science-skills/skills/conjoint-cleaning/SKILL.md
Clean and reshape Qualtrics conjoint exports to analysis-ready long format.
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research conjoint-cleaningInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Export format: When exporting from Qualtrics, select "Use choice text" (not "Use numeric values") so that attribute levels appear as human-readable labels. If working with non-Latin scripts (Chinese, Korean, Arabic), export as XLSX rather than CSV to avoid UTF-8/ANSI encoding issues. On Windows with East Asian locales, read.csv() may still require Sys.setlocale() to match the file encoding before import (see ?cjoint::read.qualtrics East Asian Language Support).
Metadata rows: Current Qualtrics CSV exports include 3 header rows before respondent data: (1) variable identifiers, (2) question text/descriptions, (3) ImportId JSON. Legacy exports have 2 rows. The cjoint::read.qualtrics() parameter new.format = TRUE (set explicitly; default is FALSE) handles the 3-row format. For manual import via readxl::read_excel() or readr::read_csv(), skip the appropriate number of metadata rows after reading headers.
Randomization order columns: If "Export viewing order data" is enabled, Qualtrics adds _DO_ columns (e.g., Block1_DO) containing pipe-separated integers showing element display order. These are useful for task-order robustness checks but are not needed for the core reshape.
Qualtrics conjoint experiments use one of three implementation methods, each producing different column naming conventions:
Method A — Conjoint Survey Design Tool (Strezhnev): Generates JavaScript that Qualtrics executes to randomize profiles. Column naming follows F-{task}-{profile}-{attribute} for attribute levels and F-{task}-{attribute} for attribute names. The cjoint R package's read.qualtrics() function is purpose-built for this format.
Method B — Custom JavaScript + Embedded Data: Researchers write JavaScript to randomize attributes and store values in Qualtrics embedded data fields. Column naming is researcher-defined. Two common conventions: (i) C{x}-F-{task}-{idx} for attribute names and C{x}-F-{task}-{profile}-{idx} for profile values; (ii) the Graham (2020) convention, choice{task}_{attr}{profile} with fixed attribute order (e.g., choice1_bread1) or c{task}_attrib{pos}_name / c{task}_attrib{pos}_sand{profile} when attribute order is also randomized. Requires manual reshaping (Section 4).
Method C — Loop & Merge: Each loop iteration represents one conjoint task. Embedded data fields are referenced via ${e://Field/variable_name} and displayed with ${lm://Field/N}. Column names reflect the embedded data field structure. Requires manual reshaping.
Before writing any cleaning code: Inspect the actual column headers, the QSF survey definition file, or any JavaScript in the survey to determine which method was used. Do not assume a column naming convention.
Before writing custom reshaping code, check whether an existing package handles the data format:
cjoint::read.qualtrics() — Purpose-built for Conjoint SDT exports (Method A). Reads Qualtrics CSV directly, handles metadata rows, outputs one row per profile with a selected column. Parameters: responses (choice column names), covariates (respondent-level variables), respondentID, new.format (TRUE for 3-row headers), ranks (for rank/rating/top-L designs). Supports binary forced choice, profile ranks, per-profile ratings, and top-L choices; see ?cjoint::read.qualtrics Details for the four response types. Requires PHP/JS output from the Conjoint Survey Design Tool.
cjdata::reshape_conjoint() — Lightweight alternative. Functions: read_Qualtrics() + reshape_conjoint(). Handles basic wide-to-long conversion. Requires the terminal character of each outcome string to be {"1","2"} or {"A","B"} (so "Candidate A" works; Japanese zenkaku digits supported). Respondent covariates merged separately.
projoint::reshape_projoint() — For measurement-error-corrected analysis per Clayton, Horiuchi, Kaufman, King, and Komisarchik (2023). Built-in support for repeated tasks (IRR estimation), missing-agreement imputation (.fill = TRUE), and bias-corrected AMCEs. Outcome column names must contain task-ID digits, and the repeated-task outcome must be the last element of .outcomes. Expects wide columns named K-{task}-{attribute} and K-{task}-{profile}-{attribute} by default (.alphabet = "K"); selected profile is parsed from the final character of each outcome string via .choice_labels (default c("A","B")). Specify .flipped = TRUE when the repeated task presents profiles in reversed left/right order (see exampleData1 vs. exampleData2 in the manual); this changes how agreement is computed. Trap: projoint::read_Qualtrics() hard-codes a 2-row metadata skip (legacy format). For current 3-row Qualtrics exports, pre-strip the third metadata row or read manually via readr::read_csv(skip = 3) before calling reshape_projoint().
cregg::cj_tidy() — Reshapes wide data across the three-level respondent/task/profile hierarchy via two named lists: profile_variables (features and profile-specific outcomes that vary within a task) and task_variables (variables that vary by task but not across profiles within it). Crucially, a choice variable that names the chosen profile ("left"/"right") goes in task_variables and must be recoded after reshaping, whereas per-profile "chosen" indicators go in profile_variables — getting this wrong silently corrupts the outcome. Constraint handling is not a cj_tidy feature; two-way design constraints are specified downstream via * in the amce()/cj() formula.
Package decision rule (default then escape hatch):
cjoint::read.qualtrics()projoint::reshape_projoint()cjdata::reshape_conjoint()cregg::cj_tidy()When existing packages cannot handle the data format, reshape manually. The goal: one row per respondent x task x profile, one column per attribute.
Step 1: Build a long table of (ResponseId, task, profile, attribute_name, attribute_value)
Iterate over tasks, profiles, and attribute positions. For each combination, read the attribute name from the name column and the corresponding value from the value column. This naturally handles randomized attribute order.
rows <- vector("list", T * P * K)
i <- 0L
for (task in seq_len(T)) {
name_cols <- paste0(prefix, "-F-", task, "-", seq_len(K))
for (profile in seq_len(P)) {
val_cols <- paste0(prefix, "-F-", task, "-", profile, "-", seq_len(K))
for (idx in seq_len(K)) {
i <- i + 1L
rows[[i]] <- data.frame(
ResponseId = data$ResponseId,
task = task,
profile = profile,
attribute_name = data[[name_cols[idx]]],
attribute_value = data[[val_cols[idx]]],
stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
}
}
}
long <- data.table::rbindlist(rows)
For Graham-style embedded fields (e.g., choice1_bread1, c1_attrib1_name/c1_attrib1_sand1), a tidyr::pivot_longer(names_pattern = ...) one-shot is often cleaner than the triple loop — match the numeric indices into task/profile/attribute-position columns, then pivot back wide on attribute_name. Use data.table::rbindlist() for performance on large datasets.
Step 2: Filter missing data. Remove rows where attribute_name or attribute_value is NA — these indicate respondents who skipped the conjoint section.
Step 3: Apply attribute name and level merges before pivoting. Fix typos, encoding variants, or synonymous levels.
Step 4: Pivot to wide-by-attribute using data.table::dcast() or tidyr::pivot_wider():
dcast(long, ResponseId + task + profile ~ attribute_name, value.var = "attribute_value")
If dcast warns about duplicate row/column combinations, two positions in the same task share an attribute name for some respondents — investigate the name merge.
Choice variables are separate Qualtrics questions (MC type), one per task, placed after each conjoint display.
Identify choice columns: These are NOT part of the embedded data fields. Map each choice question to its task number (Q17 -> task 1, Q19 -> task 2, etc.). Inspect the QSF or survey flow to confirm the mapping.
Text vs. numeric encoding: Text exports produce labels like "Person A"/"Person B" or "Profile 1"/"Profile 2". Numeric exports produce 1/2. Always verify from the actual data — do not assume.
Create the binary outcome: Prefer matching the terminal character of the choice string so the same code handles "Person A"/"Person B", "Profile 1"/"Profile 2", "Candidate A"/"Candidate B", and "Sandwich 1"/"Sandwich 2" uniformly. If numeric exports are used, coerce directly.
last_char <- stringr::str_sub(raw_choice, -1L)
chosen_profile <- dplyr::case_when(
last_char %in% c("A", "1") ~ 1L,
last_char %in% c("B", "2") ~ 2L,
TRUE ~ NA_integer_
)
# Merge by (ResponseId, task), then:
chosen <- as.integer(profile == chosen_profile)
Handle missing choices: Drop rows where chosen is NA. Some tasks may have higher dropout rates than others (especially the last task).
Ratings may be per-profile (one per profile per task — usable as a continuous conjoint DV) or per-task (one rating of the chosen profile — descriptive only, not a standard conjoint DV).
Endpoint label recoding: Qualtrics text exports encode scale endpoints as text labels (e.g., "Strongly disagree" = 1, "Strongly agree" = 7). Recode these before converting to numeric. Intermediate scale points are already numeric.
rating_num <- dplyr::case_when(
raw_rating == "Strongly disagree" ~ 1,
raw_rating == "Strongly agree" ~ 7,
TRUE ~ suppressWarnings(as.numeric(raw_rating))
)
Use recode_factor() with deliberate level ordering. The order of arguments sets the factor level order, which determines:
For Stata/SPSS/Qualtrics exports that already carry labels (e.g., loaded via haven::read_stata()), haven::as_factor() converts all labelled columns to factors in one pass (Heiss 2023). Combine with forcats::fct_relevel() to set the baseline without re-typing every level. Use recode_factor() when you also need translation or level merges.
Reference category principles:
Catching unexpected values: Set .default = NA_character_ in recode_factor() to force unrecognized values to NA. Default handling of unmatched values has varied across dplyr versions, and unexpected pilot-only levels can otherwise pass through as new factor levels or quietly coerce to NA without surfacing. Set .default explicitly so pilot contamination and typos are visible in a post-reshape table() check, not masked by silent defaults.
Drop unused levels: After filtering, call droplevels() to remove factor levels with zero observations. cregg::cj() requires 2+ realized levels per factor.
Pilot detection: Compare unique attribute levels in the data against the final design document. Extra levels (e.g., a country not in the final design) indicate pilot/pre-test respondents. Exclude these as respondents (all their rows), not just the anomalous rows — their entire randomization was generated by a different design.
Pilot exclusion is an analytic choice, not just cleaning hygiene. Under DA-RT/APSA transparency norms, the pilot-vs-final boundary should be specified in the pre-analysis plan. If it was not pre-registered, treat the exclusion as a researcher degree of freedom: log every excluded ResponseId with a reason code in a machine-readable exclusions file, and report both with-pilot and without-pilot estimates as a sensitivity check. See the pre-registration-writing and methods-reporting skills.
Missing conjoint data: Respondents who skipped the conjoint section produce all-NA attribute columns. The NA filter in Step 2 removes them. Respondents who dropped out mid-conjoint will have fewer than T x P rows — this is acceptable for cregg::cj().
Duplicate attribute names: Each task should have exactly K unique attribute names. If a merge creates duplicates within a task, the merge is incorrect.
Choice completeness: chosen should sum to T per respondent (one chosen profile per task). Fewer indicates missing choices for some tasks.
Include respondent-level covariates in the analysis-ready dataset even for main-effects-only analysis. Future subgroup and interaction analyses should not require re-running data prep.
Merge demographics (age, gender, education, urban/rural, ethnicity, party membership), treatment assignments, randomization indicators, and open-text responses by ResponseId after reshaping.
Target shape is not arbitrary. The "one row per respondent x task x profile" unit of observation is dictated by the Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto (2014) potential-outcomes framework, under which the AMCE is defined at the profile level with profile-level randomization and a no-carryover / stability assumption across tasks. Collapsing to one-row-per-task (e.g., keeping only the chosen profile's attributes) destroys the identification strategy. Ratings used as a continuous DV must also be per-profile, not per-task.
Save as .rds files (one per conjoint). The output should have:
cregg::cj() will error on character columns)ResponseId: respondent identifier (character or numeric)task: task number (integer)profile: profile number (integer)chosen: binary outcome (numeric 0/1, not logical or factor)rating (numeric)cregg compatibility: cj(data, chosen ~ Attr1 + Attr2 + ..., id = ~ResponseId). The id parameter requires a tilde formula (~ResponseId), not a bare name. The estimate parameter accepts "amce", "mm", "mm_differences", "amce_differences", and "frequencies".
cjoint compatibility: Expects a selected column (logical) and attributes named with the F-based convention. Use cjoint::amce() for estimation.
projoint compatibility: Requires a projoint_data object created via reshape_projoint(). Supports repeated-task IRR estimation and bias-corrected AMCEs.
cjoint, cjdata, or projoint can handle the data format before writing custom reshaping codechosen column is numeric, not logical or factorrecode_factor(.default = NA_character_) used to surface unexpected valuesResponseId has a machine-readable reason (pilot, no-consent, all-NA conjoint, etc.); raw export is preserved unmodifiedsessionInfo() captured; cjoint, projoint, cregg, dplyr behaviors differ across versions and should be fixed for reproducibilitytools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.