skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/discovery/conference-proceedings-guide/SKILL.md
Find, access, and cite conference papers and proceedings effectively
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research conference-proceedings-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for finding, accessing, and citing conference papers and proceedings. In many fields -- especially computer science, engineering, and HCI -- conferences are the primary venue for publishing cutting-edge research. This guide covers major proceedings databases, search strategies, and citation practices.
| Database | Coverage | Access | |----------|----------|--------| | ACM Digital Library | ACM conferences (CHI, SIGCOMM, KDD, etc.) | Institutional or ACM membership | | IEEE Xplore | IEEE conferences (CVPR, ICRA, INFOCOM, etc.) | Institutional or IEEE membership | | DBLP | CS bibliography, links to proceedings | Free metadata | | Springer LNCS | Lecture Notes in Computer Science series | Institutional | | AAAI Digital Library | AAAI, IJCAI proceedings | Free for AAAI papers | | NeurIPS / ICML / ICLR | ML conference proceedings | OpenReview (free) | | arXiv | Preprints including conference submissions | Free |
Strategy 1 - Search by conference name:
Google Scholar: source:"NeurIPS" "transformer" "attention"
DBLP: Browse conference page -> search within proceedings
Strategy 2 - Search by topic across all venues:
OpenAlex: Filter by type "proceedings-article"
Google Scholar: Use keywords, then check venue names in results
Strategy 3 - Track specific conferences:
Bookmark the conference proceedings page (e.g., openreview.net)
Subscribe to DBLP RSS feeds for specific conference series
Follow conference Twitter/social media accounts for announcements
def assess_conference_quality(conference_name: str) -> dict:
"""
Framework for evaluating conference quality and reputation.
Args:
conference_name: Name or acronym of the conference
"""
indicators = {
"acceptance_rate": {
"top_tier": "< 25%",
"mid_tier": "25-40%",
"lower_tier": "> 40%",
"note": "Check conference website for historical rates"
},
"ranking_sources": [
"CORE Conference Ranking (core.edu.au)",
"CSRankings.org (CS-specific, based on publication counts)",
"Google Scholar Metrics (h5-index for venues)",
"CCF Ranking (Chinese Computer Federation, A/B/C tiers)"
],
"quality_signals": [
"Program committee reputation and size",
"Keynote speaker caliber",
"Longevity and consistency of the conference series",
"Whether proceedings are indexed in Scopus/WoS",
"Industry participation and sponsorship"
]
}
return indicators
Tier A* (Top): ICML, NeurIPS, CVPR, ACL, SIGCOMM, OSDI, CHI, KDD
Tier A: AAAI, ECCV, EMNLP, ICSE, WWW, CIKM, ICDM
Tier B: COLING, WACV, ICSME, PAKDD, AISTATS
Tiers vary by subfield. Always check the ranking relevant to your specific area.
1. Author homepages: Many researchers post preprints/camera-ready PDFs
2. arXiv: Conference-accepted papers are often on arXiv
3. OpenReview: NeurIPS, ICLR, and others host papers with reviews
4. Institutional repository: Check the authors' university repository
5. Conference website: Some conferences offer free proceedings
6. OpenAlex: Aggregates metadata and OA links from multiple sources
Workshop papers are shorter (4-8 pages), less rigorously reviewed, and represent more preliminary work. They are still citable but carry less weight. When citing, always distinguish:
# Main conference paper:
Author et al. "Title." In Proceedings of NeurIPS 2024.
# Workshop paper:
Author et al. "Title." In Workshop on X at NeurIPS 2024.
@inproceedings{vaswani2017attention,
title = {Attention Is All You Need},
author = {Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki
and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Jones, Llion and Gomez,
Aidan N and Kaiser, Lukasz and Polosukhin, Illia},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
volume = {30},
year = {2017}
}
@article instead of @inproceedingsAlways use the official proceedings citation provided by the conference or digital library.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.