skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/cs/code-llm-papers-guide/SKILL.md
Survey and paper collection on LLMs for code generation
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research code-llm-papers-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This curated collection covers LLMs for code — from foundational models (Codex, CodeGen, StarCoder) through code generation, completion, repair, translation, and understanding. Accompanies a TMLR survey paper providing systematic categorization. Tracks 500+ papers across pre-training, fine-tuning, evaluation, and application of code-focused language models.
Code LLMs
├── Pre-training
│ ├── Encoder-only (CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT)
│ ├── Decoder-only (Codex, CodeGen, StarCoder, DeepSeek-Coder)
│ └── Encoder-Decoder (CodeT5, PLBART)
├── Fine-tuning & Alignment
│ ├── Instruction tuning (WizardCoder, Magicoder)
│ ├── RLHF for code (CodeRL)
│ └── Self-play (AlphaCode)
├── Applications
│ ├── Code generation (NL → Code)
│ ├── Code completion (infilling)
│ ├── Code repair (bug fixing)
│ ├── Code translation (language conversion)
│ ├── Code summarization (Code → NL)
│ ├── Test generation
│ └── Code review
└── Evaluation
├── Benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, SWE-bench)
├── Metrics (pass@k, CodeBLEU)
└── Security analysis
| Model | Year | Organization | Parameters | Key Innovation | |-------|------|-------------|------------|----------------| | CodeBERT | 2020 | Microsoft | 125M | Bimodal NL-PL pre-training | | Codex | 2021 | OpenAI | 12B | GPT-3 fine-tuned on GitHub | | AlphaCode | 2022 | DeepMind | 41B | Competitive programming | | StarCoder | 2023 | BigCode | 15B | Fill-in-the-middle, 1T tokens | | CodeLlama | 2023 | Meta | 34B | Llama 2 + code specialization | | DeepSeek-Coder | 2024 | DeepSeek | 33B | 2T token project-level training | | Qwen2.5-Coder | 2024 | Alibaba | 32B | 5.5T tokens, multi-language |
# Track model performance on HumanEval
humaneval_scores = {
"GPT-4": {"pass_at_1": 67.0, "pass_at_10": 86.0},
"Claude 3.5 Sonnet": {"pass_at_1": 64.0},
"DeepSeek-Coder-33B": {"pass_at_1": 56.1},
"CodeLlama-34B": {"pass_at_1": 48.8},
"StarCoder2-15B": {"pass_at_1": 46.3},
"GPT-3.5-Turbo": {"pass_at_1": 48.1},
}
print(f"{'Model':<25} {'pass@1':>8} {'pass@10':>8}")
print("-" * 43)
for model, scores in sorted(
humaneval_scores.items(),
key=lambda x: x[1].get("pass_at_1", 0),
reverse=True,
):
p1 = scores.get("pass_at_1", "—")
p10 = scores.get("pass_at_10", "—")
print(f"{model:<25} {str(p1):>8} {str(p10):>8}")
### Active Areas (2024-2025)
1. **Repository-level generation** — Understanding full codebases
2. **Agentic coding** — LLMs using tools (debugger, terminal)
3. **Formal verification** — Proving correctness of generated code
4. **Multi-language** — Cross-language transfer and translation
5. **Security** — Detecting and avoiding vulnerable code
6. **Long context** — Processing large codebases (100k+ tokens)
7. **Code editing** — Natural language instructions for code changes
import arxiv
def find_code_llm_papers(topic="code generation", max_results=20):
"""Find recent Code LLM papers on arXiv."""
query = f"abs:{topic} AND (abs:large language model OR abs:LLM)"
search = arxiv.Search(
query=query,
max_results=max_results,
sort_by=arxiv.SortCriterion.SubmittedDate,
)
for result in search.results():
print(f"[{result.published.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}] "
f"{result.title}")
find_code_llm_papers("code generation")
find_code_llm_papers("automated program repair")
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.