skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/tools/diagram/code-flow-visualizer/SKILL.md
Convert Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript functions into Mermaid flowcharts
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research code-flow-visualizerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Convert Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript functions into Mermaid flowcharts by analyzing control flow structures. This skill helps researchers document and understand complex algorithmic logic, data processing pipelines, and experimental workflows embedded in code.
Research code often contains intricate control flow: nested conditionals for data filtering, loops over experimental conditions, error handling for API calls, and branching logic for different analysis paths. Understanding this flow is critical for reproducibility, code review, and documentation, yet reading nested code can be cognitively demanding.
This skill translates source code into visual Mermaid flowcharts by parsing control flow structures (if/else, for/while loops, try/catch, match/switch, return statements) and mapping them to flowchart nodes and edges. The resulting diagrams serve as documentation supplements in README files, lab notebooks, and paper appendices.
The approach works by performing a lightweight static analysis of the code's abstract syntax tree (AST). Each control structure maps to a specific flowchart pattern: conditionals become diamond decision nodes, loops become cycles with back-edges, function calls become subroutine nodes, and return statements become terminal nodes.
| Code Structure | Flowchart Element | Mermaid Shape |
|---------------|-------------------|---------------|
| Function entry | Start node | ([Function Name]) |
| Assignment / expression | Process node | [statement] |
| if / else if | Decision diamond | {condition?} |
| for / while loop | Decision + back-edge | {loop condition?} with cycle |
| try / catch | Process + error path | [try block] with dashed error edge |
| return / yield | Terminal / output node | ([return value]) |
| Function call | Subroutine node | [[function_name()]] |
| match / switch | Multi-branch decision | {value?} with labeled edges |
Input code:
def process_papers(papers, min_citations=10):
results = []
for paper in papers:
if paper.year < 2015:
continue
if paper.citation_count < min_citations:
continue
try:
abstract = fetch_abstract(paper.doi)
embeddings = compute_embeddings(abstract)
results.append({"paper": paper, "embedding": embeddings})
except APIError:
log_error(paper.doi)
return results
Output flowchart:
flowchart TD
Start(["process_papers(papers, min_citations=10)"]) --> Init["results = [ ]"]
Init --> Loop{"For each paper in papers?"}
Loop -->|Done| Return(["Return results"])
Loop -->|Next paper| YearCheck{"paper.year < 2015?"}
YearCheck -->|Yes| Loop
YearCheck -->|No| CitCheck{"citation_count < min_citations?"}
CitCheck -->|Yes| Loop
CitCheck -->|No| TryBlock["abstract = fetch_abstract(paper.doi)"]
TryBlock --> Embed["embeddings = compute_embeddings(abstract)"]
Embed --> Append["results.append(...)"]
Append --> Loop
TryBlock -.->|APIError| LogErr["log_error(paper.doi)"]
LogErr --> Loop
Input code:
async function searchPapers(query: string, maxResults: number = 50): Promise<Paper[]> {
const cached = await cache.get(query);
if (cached) return cached;
const results: Paper[] = [];
let offset = 0;
while (results.length < maxResults) {
const batch = await api.search(query, offset, 10);
if (batch.length === 0) break;
for (const paper of batch) {
if (paper.isRetracted) continue;
results.push(paper);
}
offset += 10;
}
await cache.set(query, results);
return results;
}
Output flowchart:
flowchart TD
Start(["searchPapers(query, maxResults=50)"]) --> Cache["cached = await cache.get(query)"]
Cache --> CacheHit{"cached exists?"}
CacheHit -->|Yes| ReturnCached(["Return cached"])
CacheHit -->|No| InitResults["results = [ ], offset = 0"]
InitResults --> WhileLoop{"results.length < maxResults?"}
WhileLoop -->|No| SaveCache["await cache.set(query, results)"]
WhileLoop -->|Yes| Fetch["batch = await api.search(query, offset, 10)"]
Fetch --> EmptyCheck{"batch.length === 0?"}
EmptyCheck -->|Yes| SaveCache
EmptyCheck -->|No| ForLoop{"For each paper in batch?"}
ForLoop -->|Done| IncOffset["offset += 10"]
IncOffset --> WhileLoop
ForLoop -->|Next| Retracted{"paper.isRetracted?"}
Retracted -->|Yes| ForLoop
Retracted -->|No| Push["results.push(paper)"]
Push --> ForLoop
SaveCache --> Return(["Return results"])
Deeply nested if/else chains are flattened into a decision tree. Each branch is labeled with its condition, and nodes at the same depth are arranged vertically for readability.
Recursive calls are shown as subroutine nodes with a self-referencing edge back to the function start node. A note annotation indicates the recursion base case.
Python generators use yield as intermediate output nodes (shown as parallelogram shapes). The flowchart shows the suspension point and resumption path.
Multiple except clauses create parallel error paths from the try block, each labeled with the exception type. finally blocks are shown as a converging node that all paths pass through.
%%{init: {
'theme': 'base',
'themeVariables': {
'primaryColor': '#f8f9fa',
'primaryBorderColor': '#212529',
'primaryTextColor': '#212529',
'lineColor': '#495057',
'fontFamily': 'Times New Roman, serif',
'fontSize': '14px'
}
}}%%
flowchart TD
A["Step 1"] --> B{"Decision"} --> C["Step 2"]
# Render Mermaid to PDF for LaTeX inclusion
mmdc -i flowchart.mmd -o flowchart.pdf -t neutral -b transparent
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{flowchart.pdf}
\caption{Control flow of the data processing pipeline.}
\label{fig:flowchart}
\end{figure}
Promise.all) are noted but not fully modeled.tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.