skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/biomedical/clinical-research-guide/SKILL.md
Design clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research clinical-research-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for designing clinical studies and reporting results according to established guidelines. Covers randomized controlled trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), diagnostic studies (STARD), and systematic reviews (PRISMA).
Systematic Reviews / Meta-analyses
|
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
|
Cohort Studies (prospective)
|
Case-Control Studies
|
Cross-Sectional Studies
|
Case Reports / Case Series
|
Expert Opinion
Choose the design that best answers your research question
given ethical, practical, and resource constraints.
def select_study_design(research_question: str,
can_randomize: bool,
outcome_prevalence: str,
time_constraint: str) -> dict:
"""
Guide selection of clinical study design.
Args:
research_question: The clinical question
can_randomize: Whether randomization is ethical and feasible
outcome_prevalence: 'common' or 'rare'
time_constraint: 'short', 'medium', or 'long'
"""
if can_randomize:
design = {
"recommended": "Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)",
"reporting": "CONSORT 2010",
"strengths": "Strongest causal inference",
"considerations": [
"Need equipoise (genuine uncertainty about which is better)",
"Blinding may or may not be feasible",
"Intent-to-treat analysis is the primary approach",
"Pre-register at ClinicalTrials.gov or ISRCTN"
]
}
elif outcome_prevalence == "rare":
design = {
"recommended": "Case-Control Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Efficient for rare outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Select controls carefully (matching, population-based)",
"Recall bias is a major threat",
"Can only calculate odds ratios, not incidence"
]
}
elif time_constraint == "short":
design = {
"recommended": "Cross-Sectional Study",
"reporting": "STROBE (cross-sectional extension)",
"strengths": "Quick, inexpensive, good for prevalence",
"considerations": [
"Cannot establish temporal sequence",
"Prevalence bias (overrepresents chronic conditions)",
"Useful for hypothesis generation"
]
}
else:
design = {
"recommended": "Prospective Cohort Study",
"reporting": "STROBE",
"strengths": "Can establish temporal sequence, multiple outcomes",
"considerations": [
"Loss to follow-up is the main threat",
"Confounding must be addressed analytically",
"Expensive and time-consuming"
]
}
return design
Title and Abstract:
- Identify as randomized trial in the title
- Structured abstract with trial design, methods, results, conclusions
Methods:
- Trial design (parallel, crossover, factorial, etc.)
- Participants: Eligibility criteria, settings, locations
- Interventions: Precise details of interventions for each group
- Outcomes: Primary and secondary, how and when assessed
- Sample size: Calculation with assumptions stated
- Randomization: Sequence generation, allocation concealment
- Blinding: Who was blinded, how blinding was maintained
Results:
- CONSORT flow diagram (enrollment, allocation, follow-up, analysis)
- Baseline demographic table (Table 1)
- Primary outcome with effect size and confidence interval
- Harms and adverse events
Discussion:
- Limitations including sources of potential bias
- Generalizability
- Interpretation consistent with results
Assessed for eligibility (n=...)
|
Excluded (n=...)
- Not meeting criteria (n=...)
- Declined to participate (n=...)
- Other reasons (n=...)
|
Randomized (n=...)
/ \
Allocated to Allocated to
intervention (n=...) control (n=...)
| |
Lost to follow-up Lost to follow-up
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
| |
Analyzed (n=...) Analyzed (n=...)
Excluded from analysis Excluded from analysis
(n=..., reasons) (n=..., reasons)
Study design specific items:
Cohort:
- Report follow-up time (person-years, median)
- Report loss to follow-up with reasons
- Use hazard ratios or incidence rate ratios
Case-Control:
- Describe case definition and case ascertainment
- Describe control selection (source, matching criteria)
- Report odds ratios with confidence intervals
Cross-Sectional:
- Report response rate and non-response analysis
- Describe how the sample represents the target population
- Report prevalence with confidence intervals
def power_analysis_rct(effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
power: float = 0.80, ratio: float = 1.0) -> dict:
"""
Calculate required sample size for a two-arm RCT.
Args:
effect_size: Expected Cohen's d
alpha: Significance level (two-sided)
power: Desired statistical power
ratio: Allocation ratio (control:treatment)
"""
from scipy import stats
import math
z_alpha = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
z_beta = stats.norm.ppf(power)
n_per_arm = math.ceil(
((z_alpha + z_beta) ** 2 * (1 + 1 / ratio)) / effect_size ** 2
)
return {
"n_per_arm": n_per_arm,
"total_n": n_per_arm + math.ceil(n_per_arm * ratio),
"parameters": {
"effect_size": effect_size,
"alpha": alpha,
"power": power,
"allocation_ratio": f"1:{ratio}"
},
"note": "Add 10-20% for anticipated dropout"
}
| Guideline | Study Type | Checklist Items | |-----------|-----------|-----------------| | CONSORT | Randomized trials | 25 items + flow diagram | | STROBE | Observational studies | 22 items | | STARD | Diagnostic accuracy studies | 30 items | | PRISMA | Systematic reviews | 27 items + flow diagram | | TRIPOD | Prediction models | 22 items | | SPIRIT | Trial protocols | 33 items | | CARE | Case reports | 13 items |
All checklists are available at the EQUATOR Network (equator-network.org). Most journals require submission of the relevant checklist with your manuscript. Completing the checklist during manuscript writing, not after, ensures comprehensive reporting.
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.