skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/chemistry/chemeagle-guide/SKILL.md
Multi-agent system for chemical literature information extraction
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research chemeagle-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
ChemEagle is a multi-agent system for extracting structured chemical information from scientific literature. It uses specialized agents for recognizing chemical entities, extracting reaction conditions, identifying product yields, and building structured databases from unstructured chemistry papers. Particularly useful for building reaction databases and automating systematic reviews in chemistry.
Chemistry Paper (PDF/text)
↓
Document Parser Agent (section identification)
↓
Chemical NER Agent
├── Compound names → SMILES/InChI
├── Reagents and catalysts
├── Solvents and conditions
└── Product identification
↓
Reaction Extraction Agent
├── Reactants → Products mapping
├── Reaction conditions (T, P, time)
├── Yields and selectivity
└── Procedure steps
↓
Validation Agent (cross-check extracted data)
↓
Structured Output (JSON, CSV, database)
from chemeagle import ChemEagle
eagle = ChemEagle(llm_provider="anthropic")
# Extract from a chemistry paper
result = eagle.extract("paper.pdf")
# Extracted reactions
for rxn in result.reactions:
print(f"\nReaction {rxn.id}:")
print(f" Reactants: {rxn.reactants}")
print(f" Products: {rxn.products}")
print(f" Catalyst: {rxn.catalyst}")
print(f" Solvent: {rxn.solvent}")
print(f" Temperature: {rxn.temperature}")
print(f" Time: {rxn.time}")
print(f" Yield: {rxn.yield_percent}%")
print(f" SMILES: {rxn.product_smiles}")
# Extracted compounds
for compound in result.compounds:
print(f"{compound.name}: {compound.smiles}")
# Process multiple papers
results = eagle.extract_batch(
input_dir="chemistry_papers/",
output_format="csv",
output_file="reactions_database.csv",
)
print(f"Papers processed: {results.papers_processed}")
print(f"Reactions extracted: {results.total_reactions}")
print(f"Unique compounds: {results.unique_compounds}")
# Standalone NER
entities = eagle.recognize_entities(
"The Suzuki coupling of 4-bromoanisole with phenylboronic "
"acid using Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst in THF/water at 80°C "
"gave 4-methoxybiphenyl in 95% yield."
)
for entity in entities:
print(f" [{entity.type}] {entity.text}")
if entity.smiles:
print(f" SMILES: {entity.smiles}")
# Output:
# [REACTANT] 4-bromoanisole — SMILES: COc1ccc(Br)cc1
# [REACTANT] phenylboronic acid — SMILES: OB(O)c1ccccc1
# [CATALYST] Pd(PPh3)4
# [SOLVENT] THF/water
# [CONDITION] 80°C
# [PRODUCT] 4-methoxybiphenyl — SMILES: COc1ccc(-c2ccccc2)cc1
# [YIELD] 95%
# Build a searchable reaction database
from chemeagle import ReactionDatabase
db = ReactionDatabase("reactions.db")
# Add extracted reactions
db.add_from_extraction(result)
# Search by substrate
hits = db.search(reactant="bromoanisole", reaction_type="coupling")
for hit in hits:
print(f"{hit.reactants} → {hit.products} ({hit.yield_percent}%)")
print(f" Source: {hit.paper_doi}")
# Search by conditions
hits = db.search(catalyst="palladium", temperature_max=100)
# Export
db.export_csv("all_reactions.csv")
db.export_json("all_reactions.json")
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.