skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/search/arxiv-batch-reporting/SKILL.md
Batch search and report generation from arXiv preprint repository
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research arxiv-batch-reportingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Keeping up with the flood of new preprints on arXiv is one of the most persistent challenges in fast-moving fields like machine learning, physics, mathematics, and computer science. The arXiv Batch Reporting skill provides a systematic approach to searching, filtering, and generating structured reports from arXiv at scale.
Unlike ad-hoc manual searches, this skill enables researchers to define persistent query profiles, run batch searches across date ranges, and produce formatted reports that highlight the most relevant papers. It is particularly useful for weekly or monthly literature surveillance, lab meeting preparation, and trend analysis across subfields.
The skill leverages the arXiv API and supports advanced query syntax, category filtering, and result ranking by relevance or recency. Reports can be generated in Markdown, HTML, or CSV formats for integration into existing workflows.
Define your search profiles as structured configurations. Each profile specifies the search terms, category filters, date range, and output preferences:
profile_name: "transformer-architectures-weekly"
queries:
- "ti:transformer AND abs:attention mechanism"
- "ti:vision transformer"
- "abs:efficient transformer AND cat:cs.LG"
categories:
- cs.LG
- cs.CL
- cs.CV
date_range: "last_7_days"
max_results: 100
sort_by: "submittedDate"
sort_order: "descending"
The arXiv API supports field-specific searches:
ti: — Search in titleabs: — Search in abstractau: — Search by authorcat: — Filter by category (e.g., cs.AI, math.PR, physics.comp-ph)AND, OR, ANDNOTExample queries:
abs:generative adversarial AND cat:cs.CVau:bengio AND ti:deep learningabs:reinforcement learning ANDNOT ti:surveyThe arXiv API enforces rate limits. Follow these guidelines:
start and max_results parameters (max 2000 per request)After collecting batch results, generate a report with the following structure:
# arXiv Batch Report: [Profile Name]
**Date range:** [start] to [end]
**Total results:** [N] papers
**Generated:** [timestamp]
## Highlights (Top 10 by Relevance)
| # | Title | Authors | Category | Date |
|---|-------|---------|----------|------|
| 1 | [Title](arxiv-link) | First Author et al. | cs.LG | 2026-03-08 |
## Category Breakdown
- cs.LG: 45 papers
- cs.CL: 23 papers
- cs.CV: 18 papers
## Keyword Frequency
- "transformer": 38 mentions
- "attention": 29 mentions
- "efficient": 15 mentions
## Full Results
[Expandable table with all papers]
After retrieving raw results, apply post-processing filters to surface the most relevant papers:
For ongoing literature surveillance, automate your batch reports:
Store all generated reports in a versioned directory structure for longitudinal trend analysis:
reports/
transformer-architectures-weekly/
2026-03-03.md
2026-03-10.md
...
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.