skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/altmetrics-guide/SKILL.md
Guide to altmetrics and research impact beyond traditional citations
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research altmetrics-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Understand and use alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure the broader impact and reach of research outputs beyond traditional citation counts.
Altmetrics capture the online attention and engagement that research receives across diverse platforms. Unlike citation-based metrics (which can take years to accumulate), altmetrics provide near-real-time signals of how research is being discussed, shared, and used.
| Source Category | Examples | What It Measures | |----------------|----------|------------------| | Social media | Twitter/X, Facebook, Reddit, Weibo | Public discussion and sharing | | News & blogs | Mainstream media, science blogs | Media coverage and science communication | | Policy documents | Government reports, clinical guidelines | Policy relevance | | Reference managers | Mendeley, Zotero readership | Academic readership and interest | | Wikipedia | Article citations | Educational and encyclopedic use | | Peer review | Publons, post-publication review | Formal and informal peer evaluation | | Patents | Patent citations | Commercial and industrial relevance |
The Altmetric Attention Score is a weighted composite of online mentions:
| Source | Weight | Rationale | |--------|--------|-----------| | News outlets | 8 | Editorial curation, wide audience | | Blog posts | 5 | Expert commentary | | Wikipedia | 3 | Encyclopedic significance | | Policy documents | 3 | Real-world impact | | Twitter/X posts | 1 | Broad sharing but low barrier | | Facebook posts | 0.25 | General public engagement | | Reddit posts | 0.25 | Community discussion | | Mendeley readers | 0 (separate) | Tracked but not in score |
PlumX organizes metrics into five categories:
Dimensions provides citation counts alongside altmetric-style attention data, integrating grants, patents, clinical trials, and policy documents.
import requests
# Look up altmetrics by DOI
doi = "10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/{doi}")
if response.status_code == 200:
data = response.json()
print(f"Title: {data.get('title')}")
print(f"Altmetric Score: {data.get('score')}")
print(f"Twitter mentions: {data.get('cited_by_tweeters_count', 0)}")
print(f"News mentions: {data.get('cited_by_msm_count', 0)}")
print(f"Blog mentions: {data.get('cited_by_feeds_count', 0)}")
print(f"Wikipedia mentions: {data.get('cited_by_wikipedia_count', 0)}")
print(f"Mendeley readers: {data.get('readers', {}).get('mendeley', 0)}")
print(f"Detail URL: {data.get('details_url')}")
else:
print("No altmetric data found for this DOI")
# Query multiple DOIs using the Altmetric Explorer API (requires subscription)
# Free API supports individual lookups by DOI, PubMed ID, or arXiv ID
# Look up by PubMed ID
pmid = "34234348"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/pmid/{pmid}")
# Look up by arXiv ID
arxiv_id = "2103.14030"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/arxiv/{arxiv_id}")
| Tool | Cost | Features | |------|------|----------| | Altmetric.com Bookmarklet | Free | One-click altmetrics for any paper | | ImpactStory / OurResearch | Free | ORCID-based open access and impact profiles | | Google Scholar Profile | Free | Citation tracking, h-index, i10-index | | PlumX Dashboard | Institutional | Comprehensive multi-source tracking | | Dimensions | Free tier | Citations + grants + patents + clinical trials |
tools
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。
development
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
documentation
Use when the project collects primary data or runs a field, lab, or survey experiment, before the intervention begins — write the pre-analysis plan, size the sample from a power calculation, and register with the AEA RCT Registry. Apply after the design is chosen in aer-identification and before any outcome data are seen.
tools
Guide economists to authoritative data sources with explicit, confirmed data specifications before retrieval; interfaces with Playwright MCP to navigate portals and extract real data, not articles about data.