brycewang-stanford/altmetrics-guide
skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/literature/metadata/altmetrics-guide/SKILL.md
Guide to altmetrics and research impact beyond traditional citations
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research altmetrics-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 19, 2026, 2:16 AM11.3s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- altmetrics-guide
- description:
- Guide to altmetrics and research impact beyond traditional citations
- emoji:
- 📊
- category:
- literature
- subcategory:
- metadata
- keywords:
- ["altmetrics", "attention score", "social impact", "online mentions", "academic metrics"]
- source:
- wentor-research-plugins
Altmetrics Guide
Understand and use alternative metrics (altmetrics) to measure the broader impact and reach of research outputs beyond traditional citation counts.
What Are Altmetrics?
Altmetrics capture the online attention and engagement that research receives across diverse platforms. Unlike citation-based metrics (which can take years to accumulate), altmetrics provide near-real-time signals of how research is being discussed, shared, and used.
| Source Category | Examples | What It Measures | |----------------|----------|------------------| | Social media | Twitter/X, Facebook, Reddit, Weibo | Public discussion and sharing | | News & blogs | Mainstream media, science blogs | Media coverage and science communication | | Policy documents | Government reports, clinical guidelines | Policy relevance | | Reference managers | Mendeley, Zotero readership | Academic readership and interest | | Wikipedia | Article citations | Educational and encyclopedic use | | Peer review | Publons, post-publication review | Formal and informal peer evaluation | | Patents | Patent citations | Commercial and industrial relevance |
Key Altmetric Providers and Scores
Altmetric.com Attention Score
The Altmetric Attention Score is a weighted composite of online mentions:
| Source | Weight | Rationale | |--------|--------|-----------| | News outlets | 8 | Editorial curation, wide audience | | Blog posts | 5 | Expert commentary | | Wikipedia | 3 | Encyclopedic significance | | Policy documents | 3 | Real-world impact | | Twitter/X posts | 1 | Broad sharing but low barrier | | Facebook posts | 0.25 | General public engagement | | Reddit posts | 0.25 | Community discussion | | Mendeley readers | 0 (separate) | Tracked but not in score |
PlumX Metrics (Elsevier)
PlumX organizes metrics into five categories:
- Usage: Downloads, views, library holdings
- Captures: Bookmarks, readers, watchers
- Mentions: Blog posts, news articles, reviews, Wikipedia
- Social Media: Tweets, Facebook likes, Reddit activity
- Citations: Scopus, CrossRef, patent citations
Dimensions Badge
Dimensions provides citation counts alongside altmetric-style attention data, integrating grants, patents, clinical trials, and policy documents.
Querying the Altmetric.com API
import requests
# Look up altmetrics by DOI
doi = "10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/{doi}")
if response.status_code == 200:
data = response.json()
print(f"Title: {data.get('title')}")
print(f"Altmetric Score: {data.get('score')}")
print(f"Twitter mentions: {data.get('cited_by_tweeters_count', 0)}")
print(f"News mentions: {data.get('cited_by_msm_count', 0)}")
print(f"Blog mentions: {data.get('cited_by_feeds_count', 0)}")
print(f"Wikipedia mentions: {data.get('cited_by_wikipedia_count', 0)}")
print(f"Mendeley readers: {data.get('readers', {}).get('mendeley', 0)}")
print(f"Detail URL: {data.get('details_url')}")
else:
print("No altmetric data found for this DOI")
Batch Queries
# Query multiple DOIs using the Altmetric Explorer API (requires subscription)
# Free API supports individual lookups by DOI, PubMed ID, or arXiv ID
# Look up by PubMed ID
pmid = "34234348"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/pmid/{pmid}")
# Look up by arXiv ID
arxiv_id = "2103.14030"
response = requests.get(f"https://api.altmetric.com/v1/arxiv/{arxiv_id}")
Interpreting Altmetrics Responsibly
What Altmetrics Tell You
- Speed of dissemination: How quickly research is being noticed
- Audience breadth: Whether attention comes from academics, media, public, or policymakers
- Geographic reach: Where in the world the work is being discussed
- Interdisciplinary interest: Engagement from unexpected fields
What Altmetrics Do NOT Tell You
- Quality: High attention does not equal high quality (controversial or flawed papers can go viral)
- Field-normalized comparison: Raw scores are not comparable across disciplines
- Gaming resistance: Social media metrics can be artificially inflated
- Comprehensive coverage: Not all platforms and languages are tracked equally
Best Practices for Using Altmetrics
- Combine with traditional metrics: Use altmetrics alongside citation counts, h-index, and peer review to build a complete picture of impact.
- Context matters: A score of 50 might be exceptional in pure mathematics but ordinary in public health. Check the "Compared to outputs of the same age" percentile.
- Report responsibly: When including altmetrics in CVs or grant applications, explain what the numbers mean (e.g., "Top 5% of all research outputs tracked by Altmetric.com").
- Track over time: Set up alerts for your publications to monitor engagement trends.
- Explore the sources: Click through to see who is discussing your work and in what context. A single policy document mention may be more meaningful than 100 tweets.
Tools for Tracking Your Research Impact
| Tool | Cost | Features | |------|------|----------| | Altmetric.com Bookmarklet | Free | One-click altmetrics for any paper | | ImpactStory / OurResearch | Free | ORCID-based open access and impact profiles | | Google Scholar Profile | Free | Citation tracking, h-index, i10-index | | PlumX Dashboard | Institutional | Comprehensive multi-source tracking | | Dimensions | Free tier | Citations + grants + patents + clinical trials |
Related Skills
brycewang-stanford/thematic-analysis
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/slr-prisma
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-placebo-analysis
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026
brycewang-stanford/running-causalpy-experiments
data-ai
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.
1,685SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 5, 2026