skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/writing/polish/ai-writing-humanizer/SKILL.md
Remove AI-generated patterns to produce natural, authentic academic writing
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research ai-writing-humanizerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A skill for identifying and removing characteristic patterns of AI-generated text to produce natural, authentic academic writing. Designed for researchers who use AI tools for drafting and want to ensure the final output reads as genuine scholarly prose.
AI-generated text frequently overuses certain words and phrases:
def identify_ai_patterns(text: str) -> dict:
"""
Scan text for common AI-generated writing patterns.
Returns a report of detected patterns with suggested replacements.
"""
overused_phrases = {
# Hedging/filler phrases AI overuses
'it is important to note that': 'Note that',
'it is worth mentioning that': '[delete or rephrase]',
'it should be noted that': '[delete or rephrase]',
'in the realm of': 'in',
'in the context of': 'in / for / regarding',
'a testament to': '[rephrase with specific evidence]',
'the landscape of': '[delete -- be specific]',
'a nuanced understanding': '[delete or specify what nuance]',
'shed light on': 'clarified / revealed / explained',
'delve into': 'examined / analyzed / investigated',
'furthermore': '[vary: also, additionally, moreover, or restructure]',
'moreover': '[vary: in addition, also, or restructure]',
'utilizing': 'using',
'leverage': 'use / apply / employ',
'facilitate': 'enable / support / help',
'a myriad of': 'many / numerous / various',
'plays a crucial role': 'is important for / contributes to',
'in conclusion': '[often unnecessary -- just conclude]',
'overall': '[often unnecessary filler]',
'comprehensive': '[usually vague -- be specific about scope]',
'robust': '[overused -- specify what makes it strong]',
'multifaceted': '[specify the actual facets]',
'notably': '[usually filler -- delete or restructure]'
}
results = {'detected': [], 'total_flags': 0}
text_lower = text.lower()
for phrase, suggestion in overused_phrases.items():
count = text_lower.count(phrase.lower())
if count > 0:
results['detected'].append({
'phrase': phrase,
'count': count,
'suggestion': suggestion
})
results['total_flags'] += count
return results
AI text tends to exhibit predictable structural patterns:
AI Pattern: Formulaic paragraph structure
- Topic sentence (broad claim)
- Supporting point 1
- Supporting point 2
- Concluding/transition sentence
Every paragraph follows this exact template.
Human Fix: Vary paragraph structure
- Sometimes lead with evidence, then interpret
- Sometimes pose a question, then answer it
- Sometimes use a single punchy sentence as a paragraph
- Let paragraph length vary naturally (2-8 sentences)
AI Pattern: Excessive parallel construction
"The study examined X, analyzed Y, and evaluated Z."
"This approach enhances accuracy, improves efficiency, and reduces cost."
Human Fix: Break parallelism occasionally
"The study examined X. For Y, a different analytical lens was required,
so we turned to Z for comparison."
def humanize_sentence_variety(sentences: list[str]) -> dict:
"""
Analyze sentence variety -- AI text often has uniform sentence lengths
and structures.
"""
lengths = [len(s.split()) for s in sentences]
avg_length = sum(lengths) / len(lengths)
std_length = (sum((l - avg_length)**2 for l in lengths) / len(lengths)) ** 0.5
# Check first word variety
first_words = [s.split()[0].lower() if s.split() else '' for s in sentences]
unique_first_words = len(set(first_words)) / len(first_words)
issues = []
if std_length < 3:
issues.append(
f"Sentence lengths are too uniform (avg={avg_length:.0f}, "
f"std={std_length:.1f}). Mix short (5-10 words) and long "
f"(20-30 words) sentences."
)
if unique_first_words < 0.5:
repeated = [w for w in set(first_words) if first_words.count(w) > 2]
issues.append(
f"Too many sentences start with the same word: {repeated}. "
f"Vary sentence openings."
)
# Check for consecutive similar-length sentences
uniform_runs = 0
for i in range(1, len(lengths)):
if abs(lengths[i] - lengths[i-1]) < 3:
uniform_runs += 1
if uniform_runs > len(lengths) * 0.6:
issues.append("Too many consecutive sentences with similar lengths.")
return {
'avg_sentence_length': round(avg_length, 1),
'length_std': round(std_length, 1),
'first_word_variety': round(unique_first_words, 2),
'issues': issues,
'assessment': 'natural' if not issues else 'needs_revision'
}
AI text often defaults to an impersonal, overly balanced voice. Academic writing benefits from:
Step 1: Draft with AI assistance (outline, first draft)
Step 2: Print the draft and read aloud -- mark anything that sounds generic
Step 3: Replace flagged phrases with your natural voice
Step 4: Add personal scholarly judgment (interpretations, critiques)
Step 5: Insert discipline-specific terminology and citations
Step 6: Vary sentence structure and paragraph length
Step 7: Run the pattern detector to catch remaining AI fingerprints
Step 8: Final read-aloud check
Using AI for writing assistance is increasingly accepted in academia, but transparency is essential. Many journals now require disclosure of AI tool usage. The key ethical principle: you must deeply understand and stand behind every claim in the final text. AI is a drafting tool; scholarly judgment and intellectual ownership remain yours.
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.