skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/ai-ml/ai-agent-papers-guide/SKILL.md
Curated 2024-2026 AI agent research papers collection
npx skillsauth add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Agent-Skills-for-Empirical-Research ai-agent-papers-guideInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
A focused collection of AI agent research papers from 2024-2026, tracking the latest developments in LLM-based agent systems. Unlike broader collections, this focuses on recent breakthroughs — new architectures, benchmarks, multi-agent coordination, and real-world applications. Updated frequently as the field evolves rapidly.
Recent AI Agent Research
├── Agent Architectures
│ ├── Planning (o1-style reasoning, search-augmented)
│ ├── Memory (long-term, episodic, working)
│ └── Tool use (function calling, code execution)
├── Multi-Agent Systems
│ ├── Collaboration (task decomposition, debate)
│ ├── Competition (red team, adversarial)
│ └── Emergence (self-organization, culture)
├── Evaluation
│ ├── Benchmarks (SWE-bench, WebArena, GAIA)
│ ├── Safety (jailbreak, misuse, alignment)
│ └── Reliability (error recovery, hallucination)
├── Applications
│ ├── Software engineering (coding agents)
│ ├── Scientific research (lab automation)
│ ├── Web automation (browsing, form-filling)
│ └── Enterprise (workflow, data analysis)
└── Infrastructure
├── Frameworks (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen)
├── Protocols (MCP, A2A, tool standards)
└── Deployment (scaling, monitoring, cost)
| Paper | Venue | Key Contribution | |-------|-------|-----------------| | SWE-agent | ICLR 2025 | Agent interface design for SE | | OpenHands | 2024 | Open platform for coding agents | | AgentBench | ICLR 2024 | Multi-environment agent benchmark | | GAIA | ICLR 2024 | General AI assistant benchmark | | Voyager | NeurIPS 2024 | Lifelong learning in Minecraft | | OS-Copilot | 2024 | Self-improving computer agent | | AutoGen | 2024 | Multi-agent conversation framework | | Agent-FLAN | ACL 2024 | Agent fine-tuning methodology |
import arxiv
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
def find_recent_agent_papers(days=14):
"""Find cutting-edge agent papers."""
queries = [
"ti:agent AND (ti:LLM OR ti:language model)",
"abs:autonomous agent AND abs:tool use AND abs:2024",
"ti:multi-agent AND abs:large language",
"abs:coding agent OR abs:software agent",
]
seen = set()
papers = []
for q in queries:
search = arxiv.Search(
query=q, max_results=15,
sort_by=arxiv.SortCriterion.SubmittedDate,
)
for r in search.results():
if r.entry_id not in seen:
seen.add(r.entry_id)
papers.append({
"title": r.title,
"date": r.published.strftime("%Y-%m-%d"),
"url": r.entry_id,
})
papers.sort(key=lambda x: x["date"], reverse=True)
for p in papers[:20]:
print(f"[{p['date']}] {p['title']}")
print(f" {p['url']}")
find_recent_agent_papers()
frameworks = {
"LangGraph": {
"paradigm": "Graph-based workflows",
"persistence": "Built-in checkpointing",
"multi_agent": "Yes",
"language": "Python/JS",
},
"CrewAI": {
"paradigm": "Role-based agents",
"persistence": "Memory module",
"multi_agent": "Yes (crew)",
"language": "Python",
},
"AutoGen": {
"paradigm": "Conversational agents",
"persistence": "Chat history",
"multi_agent": "Yes (group chat)",
"language": "Python/.NET",
},
"OpenHands": {
"paradigm": "Computer use agent",
"persistence": "Workspace state",
"multi_agent": "No",
"language": "Python",
},
}
for name, info in frameworks.items():
print(f"\n{name}:")
for k, v in info.items():
print(f" {k}: {v}")
development
Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.
development
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
testing
Performs placebo-in-time sensitivity analysis with hierarchical null model and optional Bayesian assurance. Use when checking model robustness, verifying lack of pre-intervention effects, or estimating study power.
data-ai
Fit, summarize, plot, and interpret a chosen CausalPy experiment. Use after the causal method has been selected, including when configuring PyMC/sklearn models and scale-aware custom priors.