bianhaifeng789-hue/academic-paper-review

Academic Paper Review - 学术论文系统评审

借鉴 DeerFlow 2.0 的 academic-paper-review skill。

Why Systematic Review

学术论文评审需要系统性方法：

• Structure extraction - 论文结构解析
• Methodology critique - 方法论批判
• Contribution assessment - 贡献评估
• Limitation identification - 局限性识别

DeerFlow 机制:

• Structured review workflow
• Section-by-section analysis
• Contribution grading
• Limitation identification

Review Workflow

Phase 1: Structure Extraction

目标: 解析论文结构

步骤:

1. Identify title, authors, abstract
2. Extract introduction structure
3. Parse methodology sections
4. Extract results/findings
5. Identify conclusion structure

输出:

## Paper Structure

- Title: [Paper title]
- Authors: [Author list]
- Abstract: [Summary]

### Introduction
- Problem statement: [What problem?]
- Motivation: [Why important?]
- Contribution claim: [What they claim]

### Methodology
- Approach: [Their approach]
- Dataset: [What data?]
- Evaluation: [How evaluated?]

### Results
- Key findings: [Main results]
- Metrics: [Performance metrics]
- Comparison: [vs baseline]

### Conclusion
- Summary: [Main takeaway]
- Future work: [What's next?]

Phase 2: Methodology Critique

目标: 评估方法论质量

检查维度: | Dimension | Questions | |-----------|-----------| | Soundness | Is methodology sound? | | Reproducibility | Can others reproduce? | | Dataset quality | Is dataset appropriate? | | Evaluation rigor | Is evaluation rigorous? | | Ethics | Any ethical concerns? |

输出:

## Methodology Critique

### Strengths
- [Strong aspect 1]
- [Strong aspect 2]

### Weaknesses
- [Weak aspect 1]
- [Weak aspect 2]

### Concerns
- [Concern 1]
- [Concern 2]

### Reproducibility Score: [1-5]
- Code available: [Yes/No]
- Dataset available: [Yes/No]
- Hyperparameters documented: [Yes/No]

Phase 3: Contribution Assessment

目标: 评估论文贡献

评估标准:

1. Novelty - Is this new?
2. Significance - Does it matter?
3. Impact - Who benefits?
4. Relevance - Is it timely?

贡献等级: | Grade | Description | |-------|-------------| | A | Breakthrough contribution | | B | Significant contribution | | C | Incremental contribution | | D | Minor contribution | | F | No meaningful contribution |

输出:

## Contribution Assessment

### Novelty: [A/B/C/D/F]
- [Explanation]

### Significance: [A/B/C/D/F]
- [Explanation]

### Impact: [A/B/C/D/F]
- [Explanation]

### Overall Grade: [A/B/C/D/F]

Phase 4: Limitation Identification

目标: 识别局限性

检查维度: | Dimension | Questions | |-----------|-----------| | Scope | What's outside scope? | | Assumptions | What assumptions made? | | Generalization | Can results generalize? | | Future work | What's left undone? |

输出:

## Limitations

### Scope Limitations
- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]

### Assumptions
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]

### Generalization Concerns
- [Concern 1]
- [Concern 2]

### Future Work Needed
- [Work 1]
- [Work 2]

Review Template

完整评审模板:

# Academic Paper Review

## Metadata
- Title: [Paper title]
- Authors: [Authors]
- Year: [Year]
- Venue: [Conference/Journal]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of paper and your assessment]

## Structure Extraction
[Phase 1 output]

## Methodology Critique
[Phase 2 output]

## Contribution Assessment
[Phase 3 output]

## Limitations
[Phase 4 output]

## Recommendation
- Accept / Reject / Revise
- Confidence: [1-5]

## Detailed Comments
[Detailed reviewer comments]

---

Reviewed by: OpenClaw Academic Review Workflow
Date: [Date]

Usage

触发条件:

• "Review this paper: [paper content]"
• "Analyze methodology of [paper]"
• "Evaluate contribution of [paper]"

示例:

User: Review this paper: [paste paper abstract]

OpenClaw:
# Academic Paper Review

## Metadata
- Title: [Extracted title]
- Authors: [Extracted authors]

## Executive Summary
[Generated summary]

## Structure Extraction
[Structure analysis]

## Methodology Critique
[Methodology assessment]

## Contribution Assessment
[Contribution grading]

## Limitations
[Limitation identification]

## Recommendation
[Accept/Reject/Revise with confidence]

Benefits

| Benefit | Description | |---------|-------------| | Systematic | Structured review workflow | | Comprehensive | Covers all dimensions | | Objective | Standardized grading | | Efficient | Faster than manual |

Borrowed From

DeerFlow 2.0 - academic-paper-review skill

关键借鉴:

• 4-phase review workflow
• Structure extraction
• Methodology critique
• Contribution grading (A-F)
• Limitation identification

---

创建时间: 2026-04-15 借鉴来源: https://github.com/bytedance/deer-flow