skills/general/extract-requirements/SKILL.md
Extract and organize requirements from meeting transcripts, documents, and other sources into structured domain files. Load when user says 'extract requirements', 'gather requirements', 'requirements from meetings', 'document requirements', or needs to consolidate requirements from multiple sources into organized documentation.
npx skillsauth add beam-ai-team/beam-next-skills extract-requirementsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Extract requirements from source materials (meeting transcripts, documents, emails, wikis) and organize them into structured, traceable requirement domain files.
This skill helps teams consolidate scattered requirements from various sources into well-organized, traceable documentation. It:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. DISCOVERY │
│ • What projects to extract requirements for? │
│ • Where are the source materials? │
│ • Any additional sources to consider? │
│ • Where to save output? │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. PROCESSING │
│ • Read all sources chronologically │
│ • Extract requirements per project │
│ • Identify speakers/attributions │
│ • Note source file and date for each requirement │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. DOMAIN PROPOSAL │
│ • Cluster requirements into logical domains │
│ • Present proposed domains to user │
│ • User confirms, adjusts, or requests changes │
│ • Iterate until user approves │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. GENERATION │
│ • Create folder structure per project │
│ • Generate numbered domain files │
│ • Include source references, quotes, speakers │
│ • Create README index for each project │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
MANDATORY - Ask these questions before starting extraction:
What projects, agents, or products should I extract requirements for?
Examples:
- "B2B Check Agent and Email Triage Agent"
- "Mobile App v2"
- "Customer Portal redesign"
You can specify multiple - I'll create separate folders for each.
Where can I find the source materials?
Please provide:
- Folder path(s) containing meeting transcripts, documents, etc.
- File types to include (e.g., .md, .txt, .pdf)
Example: "04-workspace/client-meetings/"
Are there any additional sources I should consider?
Options:
- Additional folders with documents
- Specific files to include
- None - just the main folder
Example: "Also check 04-workspace/project-docs/ for technical specs"
Where should I save the extracted requirements?
Default: 04-workspace/project-requirements/
Custom: Specify your preferred path
For each source file, extract:
| Element | Description | |---------|-------------| | Requirement | The specific requirement or detail | | Project | Which project it applies to | | Context | Why this requirement exists | | Constraints | Any limitations or edge cases | | Source file | Path to source document | | Date | Meeting/document date | | Speaker | Who stated this (if available) | | Quote | Exact quote from source |
When extracting, tag each requirement with the relevant project:
Group requirements into domains based on:
For each project, present:
## [Project Name] - Proposed Requirement Domains
| # | Domain | Description | Est. Requirements |
|---|--------|-------------|-------------------|
| 1 | [Domain Name] | [Brief description] | ~X |
| 2 | [Domain Name] | [Brief description] | ~X |
...
Questions:
1. Does this domain structure make sense?
2. Should any domains be merged or split?
3. Any domains to add or rename?
{output-path}/
├── {project-1-slug}/
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── 01-{domain-1-slug}.md
│ ├── 02-{domain-2-slug}.md
│ └── ...
├── {project-2-slug}/
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── 01-{domain-1-slug}.md
│ └── ...
Domain file structure:
# {Domain Name}
> **Project**: {Project Name}
> **Domain**: {Domain Name}
> **Last Updated**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
---
## Overview
{Brief description of what this domain covers}
---
## 1. {Section Name}
| Requirement | Details |
|-------------|---------|
| {Requirement} | {Description} |
**Source**: [2025-09-29 Meeting Title](relative/path/to/file.md)
> "Exact quote from source." — Speaker Name
---
## Open Questions / Blockers
| Item | Owner | Status |
|------|-------|--------|
| {Question} | {Person} | {Status} |
README structure:
# {Project Name} - Requirements Documentation
> **Generated**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
> **Source**: {N} files from {date range}
## Requirement Domains
| # | Domain | Description |
|---|--------|-------------|
| 1 | [{Domain}](01-domain.md) | {Brief description} |
## Key Metrics / Integrations / Timeline / Contacts
(Include sections as relevant based on extracted content)
| Type | Extensions | Notes |
|------|------------|-------|
| Meeting transcripts | .md, .txt | Primary source type |
| Documents | .md, .txt, .pdf | Technical specs, PRDs |
| Emails | .md, .txt, .eml | If exported as text |
| Wiki exports | .md, .html | Confluence, Notion exports |
| Scenario | Handling | |----------|----------| | Empty source folder | Inform user, ask for correct path | | No requirements found for a project | Confirm project name, suggest alternatives | | Speaker not identifiable | Use "— Source document" instead | | Ambiguous project assignment | Ask user to clarify |
User: "Extract requirements from our client meetings"
AI Response:
I'll help you extract and organize requirements. Let me ask a few questions:
1. What projects should I extract requirements for?
(e.g., "API Gateway" and "Admin Dashboard")
2. Where are your meeting transcripts?
(e.g., "04-workspace/client-meetings/")
3. Any additional sources to include?
(e.g., technical docs, emails)
4. Where should I save the output?
Default: 04-workspace/project-requirements/
development
--- name: taste-skill type: skill version: '1.0' author: Leonxlnx (packaged by Zhichao Li) category: general tags: - frontend - design - anti-slop - landing-page updated: '2026-06-11' visibility: public description: Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check. license: MIT.
development
Use when communicating quantitative information in any form — Slack updates, emails, reports, decks, dashboards, landing pages, product UI, public talks. Covers two integrated layers: (1) making numbers semantically meaningful (translation, anchoring, simplification, story-pairing) and (2) showing numbers cleanly (chart vs table vs prose, chart-by-message, pre-attentive emphasis, color discipline, decluttering). Distilled and integrated from *Show Me the Numbers* (Stephen Few) and *Make Numbers Count* (Chip Heath & Karla Starr). Not for raw data analysis or statistics — this is about communication of numbers, not their derivation.
development
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
tools
Stateful multi-session tutor adapted for Beam — teach a stakeholder to understand, trust, and operate a specific agent, or teach a Solution Engineer a client's business process for delivery. Grounds every lesson in Knowledge Hub sources (real agent graphs, real tasks, transcripts, Linear) before any web resource. Also works for any general topic. Trigger on "teach me", "beam teach", "教我", "onboard <person> on <agent>", "help <stakeholder> understand the agent", "learn this client's process".