skills/general/extract-requirements/SKILL.md
Extract and organize requirements from meeting transcripts, documents, and other sources into structured domain files. Load when user says 'extract requirements', 'gather requirements', 'requirements from meetings', 'document requirements', or needs to consolidate requirements from multiple sources into organized documentation.
npx skillsauth add beam-ai-team/beam-next-skills extract-requirementsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Extract requirements from source materials (meeting transcripts, documents, emails, wikis) and organize them into structured, traceable requirement domain files.
Before reading source folders or generating requirement files, show the projects in scope, source paths, output directory, proposed domain files, and whether quotes/speaker attribution will be included. Require explicit user approval in the current turn before writing or overwriting local files. Do not share source transcripts or generated requirements externally from this skill.
This skill helps teams consolidate scattered requirements from various sources into well-organized, traceable documentation. It:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. DISCOVERY │
│ • What projects to extract requirements for? │
│ • Where are the source materials? │
│ • Any additional sources to consider? │
│ • Where to save output? │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. PROCESSING │
│ • Read all sources chronologically │
│ • Extract requirements per project │
│ • Identify speakers/attributions │
│ • Note source file and date for each requirement │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. DOMAIN PROPOSAL │
│ • Cluster requirements into logical domains │
│ • Present proposed domains to user │
│ • User confirms, adjusts, or requests changes │
│ • Iterate until user approves │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. GENERATION │
│ • Create folder structure per project │
│ • Generate numbered domain files │
│ • Include source references, quotes, speakers │
│ • Create README index for each project │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
MANDATORY - Ask these questions before starting extraction:
What projects, agents, or products should I extract requirements for?
Examples:
- "B2B Check Agent and Email Triage Agent"
- "Mobile App v2"
- "Customer Portal redesign"
You can specify multiple - I'll create separate folders for each.
Where can I find the source materials?
Please provide:
- Folder path(s) containing meeting transcripts, documents, etc.
- File types to include (e.g., .md, .txt, .pdf)
Example: "04-workspace/client-meetings/"
Are there any additional sources I should consider?
Options:
- Additional folders with documents
- Specific files to include
- None - just the main folder
Example: "Also check 04-workspace/project-docs/ for technical specs"
Where should I save the extracted requirements?
Default: 04-workspace/project-requirements/
Custom: Specify your preferred path
For each source file, extract:
| Element | Description | |---------|-------------| | Requirement | The specific requirement or detail | | Project | Which project it applies to | | Context | Why this requirement exists | | Constraints | Any limitations or edge cases | | Source file | Path to source document | | Date | Meeting/document date | | Speaker | Who stated this (if available) | | Quote | Exact quote from source |
When extracting, tag each requirement with the relevant project:
Group requirements into domains based on:
For each project, present:
## [Project Name] - Proposed Requirement Domains
| # | Domain | Description | Est. Requirements |
|---|--------|-------------|-------------------|
| 1 | [Domain Name] | [Brief description] | ~X |
| 2 | [Domain Name] | [Brief description] | ~X |
...
Questions:
1. Does this domain structure make sense?
2. Should any domains be merged or split?
3. Any domains to add or rename?
{output-path}/
├── {project-1-slug}/
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── 01-{domain-1-slug}.md
│ ├── 02-{domain-2-slug}.md
│ └── ...
├── {project-2-slug}/
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── 01-{domain-1-slug}.md
│ └── ...
Domain file structure:
# {Domain Name}
> **Project**: {Project Name}
> **Domain**: {Domain Name}
> **Last Updated**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
---
## Overview
{Brief description of what this domain covers}
---
## 1. {Section Name}
| Requirement | Details |
|-------------|---------|
| {Requirement} | {Description} |
**Source**: [2025-09-29 Meeting Title](relative/path/to/file.md)
> "Exact quote from source." — Speaker Name
---
## Open Questions / Blockers
| Item | Owner | Status |
|------|-------|--------|
| {Question} | {Person} | {Status} |
README structure:
# {Project Name} - Requirements Documentation
> **Generated**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
> **Source**: {N} files from {date range}
## Requirement Domains
| # | Domain | Description |
|---|--------|-------------|
| 1 | [{Domain}](01-domain.md) | {Brief description} |
## Key Metrics / Integrations / Timeline / Contacts
(Include sections as relevant based on extracted content)
| Type | Extensions | Notes |
|------|------------|-------|
| Meeting transcripts | .md, .txt | Primary source type |
| Documents | .md, .txt, .pdf | Technical specs, PRDs |
| Emails | .md, .txt, .eml | If exported as text |
| Wiki exports | .md, .html | Confluence, Notion exports |
| Scenario | Handling | |----------|----------| | Empty source folder | Inform user, ask for correct path | | No requirements found for a project | Confirm project name, suggest alternatives | | Speaker not identifiable | Use "— Source document" instead | | Ambiguous project assignment | Ask user to clarify |
User: "Extract requirements from our client meetings"
AI Response:
I'll help you extract and organize requirements. Let me ask a few questions:
1. What projects should I extract requirements for?
(e.g., "API Gateway" and "Admin Dashboard")
2. Where are your meeting transcripts?
(e.g., "04-workspace/client-meetings/")
3. Any additional sources to include?
(e.g., technical docs, emails)
4. Where should I save the output?
Default: 04-workspace/project-requirements/
tools
Build a Palantir-shape, PDF-native use-case proposal document for a sophisticated enterprise account: research-grounded use cases (each with description, challenge, impact, value), an operating-graph ontology page, a recommended PoC with a week-by-week plan, and a closing page that asks for one decision. Load when a client asks us to 'propose high-impact use cases', requests a use-case presentation/catalog for a function (finance, HR, ops), or when a technical evaluation team will review candidates to pick a PoC. NOT for single-account cold outreach (use prospect-brief), full process diagnostics (use operating-diagnostic), or priced proposals (use proposal-creation).
development
Convert Beam Figma slide designs into high-fidelity, editable HTML presentation decks. Use when Codex is asked to audit Figma slides, extract slide templates, rebuild Beam slides as HTML decks, decide whether Figma imagery should be exported or rebuilt in HTML/CSS, create Beam/Prism-compatible deck templates, or improve fidelity of existing Beam HTML slide rebuilds.
development
Use the Beam AI reusable slide library: individual HTML slide templates extracted from Beam Figma rebuilds, kept separate from deck themes and full deck templates. Load when the user asks for a slide library, specific Beam slide patterns, reusable Figma-inspired slides, Prism slide-library items, or slide-level HTML templates.
development
Use Beam AI deck and report design packs, HTML templates, and curated examples to create sales decks, customer intro decks, RPO decks, and DIN A4 use-case proposal reports. Load when the user asks for Beam-branded presentation templates, Prism-compatible deck templates, Beam report templates, customer intro decks, commercial proposals, or reusable HTML deck/report examples.