skills/beam/beam-tools/calculate-beam-agent-pricing/SKILL.md
Design node architecture and calculate comprehensive pricing for Beam AI agents based on requirements. Load when user says 'calculate agent pricing', 'price this agent', 'design agent architecture', 'estimate agent cost', 'node breakdown for agent', or needs detailed cost analysis for a Beam agent project. Generates complete node-by-node breakdown with credit consumption, monthly economics, optimization strategies, and client pricing models.
npx skillsauth add beam-ai-team/beam-next-skills calculate-beam-agent-pricingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Generate comprehensive node architecture and pricing analysis for Beam AI agents, including:
Ask the user to provide (or help them define):
Basic Information:
Technical Requirements:
Quality Requirements:
Example Questions:
What does this agent do? (1-2 sentence description)
How many times will it run per month?
What data sources does it need to access?
What's the main output/action it performs?
Do you need quality validation before final output?
Are there optional features we could cut to reduce costs?
Based on requirements, design the node architecture using this framework:
SECTION 1: TRIGGER & CONTEXT RETRIEVAL
SECTION 2: ANALYSIS & PROCESSING
SECTION 3: GENERATION/ACTION
SECTION 4: QUALITY VALIDATION (optional but recommended)
SECTION 5: DELIVERY & LOGGING
Node Design Principles:
For each node, specify:
Template:
#### Node X: [Name]
- **Type**: [Trigger/Integration/LLM/Logic]
- **Purpose**: [Clear description]
- **Model**: [If LLM - specify model and why]
- **Input**: [Data received]
- **Prompt**: [If LLM - full prompt]
- **Output**: [Data produced]
- **Credits**: **X**
Create a consumption breakdown table:
| Section | Nodes | Credits | Details | |---------|-------|---------|---------| | Trigger & Context | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Analysis | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Generation | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Validation | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Delivery | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | TOTAL | X nodes | N credits | Per execution |
Model Usage Breakdown:
| Model Type | Usage per Execution | Credits per Usage | Total Credits | % of Total | |------------|---------------------|-------------------|---------------|------------| | LLM - Basic | X calls | 1 | X | X% | | LLM - Standard | X calls | 3 | X | X% | | LLM - Advanced | X calls | 5 | X | X% | | Integration Nodes | X calls | 1 | X | X% | | Logic/Triggers | X nodes | 0 | 0 | 0% | | TOTAL | X nodes | - | X | 100% |
Formula:
Total Monthly Credits = Credits per Execution × Monthly Volume
Cost Calculation:
Create Pricing Tables:
| Volume | Total Credits | Cost @ 4.0x | Cost @ 2.5x | Client Price | Margin @ 4.0x | |--------|---------------|-------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| | [Monthly Volume] | [Total] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $XX,XXX | XX% ($X,XXX) |
[Same table with reduced credit count]
| Scenario | Executions | Credits | Cost @ 4.0x | Cost @ 2.5x | Client Price | Margin | |----------|------------|---------|-------------|-------------|--------------|--------| | Full | [N] | [N] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | XX% | | Optimized | [N] | [N] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | XX% |
Analyze the architecture for optimization opportunities:
Common Optimizations:
| Strategy | Credits Saved | Impact on Quality | Recommendation | |----------|---------------|-------------------|----------------| | Remove optional enrichment | -X | Low | ✅ Start without, add if needed | | Use cheaper LLM for simple tasks | -X | Low-Medium | ✅ Recommended | | Skip optional validation | -X | High risk | ❌ Not recommended | | Cache repeated analyses | -X avg | None | ✅ Implement when possible | | Merge similar nodes | -X | Low | ✅ Good optimization |
Optimization Scenarios:
Pricing Model Options:
Cost per execution = (Credits × Your Rate) + Profit Margin
Recommended margin: 40-60% for enterprise
Example:
Monthly fee = (Monthly Credits × Your Rate × 1.5) + Buffer
Buffer accounts for: overages, support, optimization
Tiered Pricing: | Tier | Monthly Fee | Executions Included | Overage Rate | Your Margin | |------|-------------|---------------------|--------------|-------------| | Basic | $X,XXX | [Volume] | $X.XX/exec | XX% | | Professional | $X,XXX | [Volume] + features | $X.XX/exec | XX% | | Enterprise | $X,XXX | Unlimited | $X.XX/exec | XX% |
Generate a markdown file with these sections:
1. Overview
2. Agent Architecture: X-Node Workflow
3. Credit Consumption Summary
4. Cost Optimization Options
5. Monthly Economics
6. Client Pricing Recommendations
7. Architecture Flow Diagram
8. Implementation Phases
9. Success Metrics
10. Technical Requirements
11. Risk Mitigation
12. Next Steps
Offer to save the document:
Would you like me to save this pricing document?
Options:
1. Save to current project: 02-projects/{project-id}/01-planning/node-architecture.md
2. Save to workspace: 04-workspace/pricing-proposals/{agent-name}-pricing.md
3. Display only (I'll copy manually)
If saving to a project, check if project exists first. If not, suggest creating one.
Present the pricing analysis and ask:
I've calculated the following for your agent:
ARCHITECTURE: [X] nodes, [Y] credits per execution
MONTHLY COST: $[X,XXX] - $[Y,YYY] depending on markup
CLIENT PRICING: $[XX,XXX] - $[YY,YYY]/month (recommended)
MARGIN: [XX]% - [YY]%
Would you like to:
1. Adjust the architecture (add/remove features)
2. Explore different optimization scenarios
3. Refine client pricing strategy
4. Proceed with this analysis
Offer to create:
Use GPT-4o-mini / Claude Haiku (1 credit) for:
Use GPT-4o / Claude Sonnet (3 credits) for:
Use Claude Opus (5 credits) for:
Each API call = 1 credit:
Minimize integration nodes by:
Always include validation (3-5 credits) when:
Can skip validation when:
Value Justification Formula:
Agent ROI = (Time Saved × Hourly Rate) + (Revenue Impact) - (Agent Cost)
Example Pitch:
Target Margins by Client Type:
Adjust margins based on:
POC should:
POC Risk Mitigation:
| Component | Credits | Models | |-----------|---------|--------| | LLM - Basic | 1 | GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku, DeepSeek, Granite3 | | LLM - Standard | 3 | GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 3.5, Gemini 2.0 Flash | | LLM - Advanced | 5 | GPT-o1, Claude Opus, Gemini 2.5 PRO | | Integration Node | 1 | All API calls | | Attachment | 3 min | Cost-based: ceil(tokens × cost_per_token / credit_value) | | Chat Trigger | 0 | Free | | Webhook Trigger | 0 | Free | | Other Triggers | 1 | Scheduled, integration-based |
Pro Plan:
Enterprise Plan:
| Markup | Cost per Credit | When to Use | |--------|----------------|-------------| | 4.0x (default) | $0.08 | Standard enterprise pricing | | 2.5x (negotiated) | $0.05 | High-volume clients, strategic accounts | | 2.0x (discount) | $0.04 | Very high volume (>500K credits/month) |
User asks: "Calculate pricing for a lead qualification agent that runs 10,000 times/month"
Your response:
Let me design the architecture and calculate pricing for your lead qualification agent.
REQUIREMENTS QUESTIONS:
1. What data sources does it need? (CRM, enrichment APIs, etc.)
2. How complex is the qualification logic? (Simple scoring vs deep analysis)
3. Does it need to generate explanations or just scores?
4. Where does the output go? (CRM update, Slack notification, etc.)
5. Do you need quality validation/confidence scores?
[Wait for answers, then design architecture]
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE (Example):
- Webhook trigger (0) + CRM fetch (1) + Enrichment API (1) = 2 credits
- Analysis with GPT-4o-mini (1) = 1 credit
- Score logic (0) + CRM update (1) + Slack notify (1) = 2 credits
TOTAL: 6 credits/execution
MONTHLY ECONOMICS:
- Volume: 10,000 executions
- Credits: 60,000
- Your cost @ 4.0x: $4,800/month
- Your cost @ 2.5x: $3,000/month
CLIENT PRICING:
- Per-lead: $0.80-$1.20/lead (40-60% margin)
- Monthly retainer: $8,000-$10,000 (40-52% margin @ 4.0x)
VALUE JUSTIFICATION:
- Manual qualification: 10,000 leads × 5 min = 833 hours = $41,667/month
- Agent cost: $8,000/month
- Savings: $33,667/month (80% cost reduction)
Would you like me to:
1. Generate the full node architecture document
2. Adjust the design for more/less features
3. Explore optimization scenarios
Before finalizing pricing, verify:
Architecture:
Pricing:
Client Value:
Documentation:
After completing pricing calculation:
Version: 1.0 Created: 2026-02-03 Category: Beam AI | Pricing | Architecture Design Estimated Time: 30-45 minutes for comprehensive analysis Prerequisites: Agent requirements, volume estimates Outputs: Node architecture, credit calculations, pricing recommendations, markdown document
development
--- name: taste-skill type: skill version: '1.0' author: Leonxlnx (packaged by Zhichao Li) category: general tags: - frontend - design - anti-slop - landing-page updated: '2026-06-11' visibility: public description: Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check. license: MIT.
development
Use when communicating quantitative information in any form — Slack updates, emails, reports, decks, dashboards, landing pages, product UI, public talks. Covers two integrated layers: (1) making numbers semantically meaningful (translation, anchoring, simplification, story-pairing) and (2) showing numbers cleanly (chart vs table vs prose, chart-by-message, pre-attentive emphasis, color discipline, decluttering). Distilled and integrated from *Show Me the Numbers* (Stephen Few) and *Make Numbers Count* (Chip Heath & Karla Starr). Not for raw data analysis or statistics — this is about communication of numbers, not their derivation.
development
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
tools
Stateful multi-session tutor adapted for Beam — teach a stakeholder to understand, trust, and operate a specific agent, or teach a Solution Engineer a client's business process for delivery. Grounds every lesson in Knowledge Hub sources (real agent graphs, real tasks, transcripts, Linear) before any web resource. Also works for any general topic. Trigger on "teach me", "beam teach", "教我", "onboard <person> on <agent>", "help <stakeholder> understand the agent", "learn this client's process".