skills/beam/beam-tools/calculate-beam-agent-pricing/SKILL.md
Design node architecture and calculate comprehensive pricing for Beam AI agents based on requirements. Load when user says 'calculate agent pricing', 'price this agent', 'design agent architecture', 'estimate agent cost', 'node breakdown for agent', or needs detailed cost analysis for a Beam agent project. Generates complete node-by-node breakdown with credit consumption, monthly economics, optimization strategies, and client pricing models.
npx skillsauth add beam-ai-team/beam-next-skills calculate-beam-agent-pricingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This skill produces planning and pricing recommendations only. Before saving, sending, or using a pricing report in a customer-facing proposal, show the assumptions, expected volume, selected models, credit math, margin/pricing model, and any customer-sensitive details. Require explicit user approval in the current turn before exporting or sharing the report. Do not create, update, publish, or run Beam agents from this skill.
Generate comprehensive node architecture and pricing analysis for Beam AI agents, including:
Ask the user to provide (or help them define):
Basic Information:
Technical Requirements:
Quality Requirements:
Example Questions:
What does this agent do? (1-2 sentence description)
How many times will it run per month?
What data sources does it need to access?
What's the main output/action it performs?
Do you need quality validation before final output?
Are there optional features we could cut to reduce costs?
Based on requirements, design the node architecture using this framework:
SECTION 1: TRIGGER & CONTEXT RETRIEVAL
SECTION 2: ANALYSIS & PROCESSING
SECTION 3: GENERATION/ACTION
SECTION 4: QUALITY VALIDATION (optional but recommended)
SECTION 5: DELIVERY & LOGGING
Node Design Principles:
For each node, specify:
Template:
#### Node X: [Name]
- **Type**: [Trigger/Integration/LLM/Logic]
- **Purpose**: [Clear description]
- **Model**: [If LLM - specify model and why]
- **Input**: [Data received]
- **Prompt**: [If LLM - full prompt]
- **Output**: [Data produced]
- **Credits**: **X**
Create a consumption breakdown table:
| Section | Nodes | Credits | Details | |---------|-------|---------|---------| | Trigger & Context | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Analysis | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Generation | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Validation | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | Delivery | X-Y | N | [Breakdown] | | TOTAL | X nodes | N credits | Per execution |
Model Usage Breakdown:
| Model Type | Usage per Execution | Credits per Usage | Total Credits | % of Total | |------------|---------------------|-------------------|---------------|------------| | LLM - Basic | X calls | 1 | X | X% | | LLM - Standard | X calls | 3 | X | X% | | LLM - Advanced | X calls | 5 | X | X% | | Integration Nodes | X calls | 1 | X | X% | | Logic/Triggers | X nodes | 0 | 0 | 0% | | TOTAL | X nodes | - | X | 100% |
Formula:
Total Monthly Credits = Credits per Execution × Monthly Volume
Cost Calculation:
Create Pricing Tables:
| Volume | Total Credits | Cost @ 4.0x | Cost @ 2.5x | Client Price | Margin @ 4.0x | |--------|---------------|-------------|-------------|--------------|---------------| | [Monthly Volume] | [Total] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $XX,XXX | XX% ($X,XXX) |
[Same table with reduced credit count]
| Scenario | Executions | Credits | Cost @ 4.0x | Cost @ 2.5x | Client Price | Margin | |----------|------------|---------|-------------|-------------|--------------|--------| | Full | [N] | [N] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | XX% | | Optimized | [N] | [N] | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | $X,XXX | XX% |
Analyze the architecture for optimization opportunities:
Common Optimizations:
| Strategy | Credits Saved | Impact on Quality | Recommendation | |----------|---------------|-------------------|----------------| | Remove optional enrichment | -X | Low | ✅ Start without, add if needed | | Use cheaper LLM for simple tasks | -X | Low-Medium | ✅ Recommended | | Skip optional validation | -X | High risk | ❌ Not recommended | | Cache repeated analyses | -X avg | None | ✅ Implement when possible | | Merge similar nodes | -X | Low | ✅ Good optimization |
Optimization Scenarios:
Pricing Model Options:
Cost per execution = (Credits × Your Rate) + Profit Margin
Recommended margin: 40-60% for enterprise
Example:
Monthly fee = (Monthly Credits × Your Rate × 1.5) + Buffer
Buffer accounts for: overages, support, optimization
Tiered Pricing: | Tier | Monthly Fee | Executions Included | Overage Rate | Your Margin | |------|-------------|---------------------|--------------|-------------| | Basic | $X,XXX | [Volume] | $X.XX/exec | XX% | | Professional | $X,XXX | [Volume] + features | $X.XX/exec | XX% | | Enterprise | $X,XXX | Unlimited | $X.XX/exec | XX% |
Generate a markdown file with these sections:
1. Overview
2. Agent Architecture: X-Node Workflow
3. Credit Consumption Summary
4. Cost Optimization Options
5. Monthly Economics
6. Client Pricing Recommendations
7. Architecture Flow Diagram
8. Implementation Phases
9. Success Metrics
10. Technical Requirements
11. Risk Mitigation
12. Next Steps
Offer to save the document:
Would you like me to save this pricing document?
Options:
1. Save to current project: 02-projects/{project-id}/01-planning/node-architecture.md
2. Save to workspace: 04-workspace/pricing-proposals/{agent-name}-pricing.md
3. Display only (I'll copy manually)
If saving to a project, check if project exists first. If not, suggest creating one.
Present the pricing analysis and ask:
I've calculated the following for your agent:
ARCHITECTURE: [X] nodes, [Y] credits per execution
MONTHLY COST: $[X,XXX] - $[Y,YYY] depending on markup
CLIENT PRICING: $[XX,XXX] - $[YY,YYY]/month (recommended)
MARGIN: [XX]% - [YY]%
Would you like to:
1. Adjust the architecture (add/remove features)
2. Explore different optimization scenarios
3. Refine client pricing strategy
4. Proceed with this analysis
Offer to create:
Use GPT-4o-mini / Claude Haiku (1 credit) for:
Use GPT-4o / Claude Sonnet (3 credits) for:
Use Claude Opus (5 credits) for:
Each API call = 1 credit:
Minimize integration nodes by:
Always include validation (3-5 credits) when:
Can skip validation when:
Value Justification Formula:
Agent ROI = (Time Saved × Hourly Rate) + (Revenue Impact) - (Agent Cost)
Example Pitch:
Target Margins by Client Type:
Adjust margins based on:
POC should:
POC Risk Mitigation:
| Component | Credits | Models | |-----------|---------|--------| | LLM - Basic | 1 | GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku, DeepSeek, Granite3 | | LLM - Standard | 3 | GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 3.5, Gemini 2.0 Flash | | LLM - Advanced | 5 | GPT-o1, Claude Opus, Gemini 2.5 PRO | | Integration Node | 1 | All API calls | | Attachment | 3 min | Cost-based: ceil(tokens × cost_per_token / credit_value) | | Chat Trigger | 0 | Free | | Webhook Trigger | 0 | Free | | Other Triggers | 1 | Scheduled, integration-based |
Pro Plan:
Enterprise Plan:
| Markup | Cost per Credit | When to Use | |--------|----------------|-------------| | 4.0x (default) | $0.08 | Standard enterprise pricing | | 2.5x (negotiated) | $0.05 | High-volume clients, strategic accounts | | 2.0x (discount) | $0.04 | Very high volume (>500K credits/month) |
User asks: "Calculate pricing for a lead qualification agent that runs 10,000 times/month"
Your response:
Let me design the architecture and calculate pricing for your lead qualification agent.
REQUIREMENTS QUESTIONS:
1. What data sources does it need? (CRM, enrichment APIs, etc.)
2. How complex is the qualification logic? (Simple scoring vs deep analysis)
3. Does it need to generate explanations or just scores?
4. Where does the output go? (CRM update, Slack notification, etc.)
5. Do you need quality validation/confidence scores?
[Wait for answers, then design architecture]
PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE (Example):
- Webhook trigger (0) + CRM fetch (1) + Enrichment API (1) = 2 credits
- Analysis with GPT-4o-mini (1) = 1 credit
- Score logic (0) + CRM update (1) + Slack notify (1) = 2 credits
TOTAL: 6 credits/execution
MONTHLY ECONOMICS:
- Volume: 10,000 executions
- Credits: 60,000
- Your cost @ 4.0x: $4,800/month
- Your cost @ 2.5x: $3,000/month
CLIENT PRICING:
- Per-lead: $0.80-$1.20/lead (40-60% margin)
- Monthly retainer: $8,000-$10,000 (40-52% margin @ 4.0x)
VALUE JUSTIFICATION:
- Manual qualification: 10,000 leads × 5 min = 833 hours = $41,667/month
- Agent cost: $8,000/month
- Savings: $33,667/month (80% cost reduction)
Would you like me to:
1. Generate the full node architecture document
2. Adjust the design for more/less features
3. Explore optimization scenarios
Before finalizing pricing, verify:
Architecture:
Pricing:
Client Value:
Documentation:
After completing pricing calculation:
Version: 1.0 Created: 2026-02-03 Category: Beam AI | Pricing | Architecture Design Estimated Time: 30-45 minutes for comprehensive analysis Prerequisites: Agent requirements, volume estimates Outputs: Node architecture, credit calculations, pricing recommendations, markdown document
tools
Build a Palantir-shape, PDF-native use-case proposal document for a sophisticated enterprise account: research-grounded use cases (each with description, challenge, impact, value), an operating-graph ontology page, a recommended PoC with a week-by-week plan, and a closing page that asks for one decision. Load when a client asks us to 'propose high-impact use cases', requests a use-case presentation/catalog for a function (finance, HR, ops), or when a technical evaluation team will review candidates to pick a PoC. NOT for single-account cold outreach (use prospect-brief), full process diagnostics (use operating-diagnostic), or priced proposals (use proposal-creation).
development
Convert Beam Figma slide designs into high-fidelity, editable HTML presentation decks. Use when Codex is asked to audit Figma slides, extract slide templates, rebuild Beam slides as HTML decks, decide whether Figma imagery should be exported or rebuilt in HTML/CSS, create Beam/Prism-compatible deck templates, or improve fidelity of existing Beam HTML slide rebuilds.
development
Use the Beam AI reusable slide library: individual HTML slide templates extracted from Beam Figma rebuilds, kept separate from deck themes and full deck templates. Load when the user asks for a slide library, specific Beam slide patterns, reusable Figma-inspired slides, Prism slide-library items, or slide-level HTML templates.
development
Use Beam AI deck and report design packs, HTML templates, and curated examples to create sales decks, customer intro decks, RPO decks, and DIN A4 use-case proposal reports. Load when the user asks for Beam-branded presentation templates, Prism-compatible deck templates, Beam report templates, customer intro decks, commercial proposals, or reusable HTML deck/report examples.