content/skills/learning-skills/rank/SKILL.md
Domain-reduction skill that finds the smallest set of independent generators behind a messy field and proves them with four tests: generativity, minimality, independence, and predictive power. Use when the user asks for 秩 / irreducible structure / what really holds a domain up, or wants to reduce many phenomena to a small hidden core. Do not use it for ordinary summaries or plain-language rewrites.
npx skillsauth add bahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings rankInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
输入一个领域,输出它的秩。
秩不是"关键要素",不是"核心原则",不是"总结要点"。
秩是:这个领域里真正独立的生成器有几个?用它们能反向生成全部现象?能,才算找到。
如果用户没有给出现象清单,你先补一组足够代表性的现象,再开始降秩。
这四条全过,秩才立。任何一条失败,推倒重来。
写一篇散文。不是填一张表。
你的任务是带着读者走一段路:从"这个领域看着挺乱"走到"原来就这两三根线在牵"。这段路怎么走,你自己决定。没有规定的章节、没有规定的格式、没有规定的小标题。
唯一的要求是三条:
四个判据的验证必须做,融进文章里。验证本身就是叙事的一部分——"拆掉一个生成器世界会变成什么样"是好故事,"用生成器推出一个意想不到的现象"是好结尾。不要另设附录。
正文结束后,必须给一个极短的结论区,明确写出:
秩:{N},或在无法成立时写 秩:未定一句话:{可复述的 takeaway}如果某个生成器过不了四个判据中的任何一条,就推倒重来。若最终仍无法满足四条,不要硬编结论;写 秩:未定,并说明是哪个判据卡住了。
references/template.org。Get-Date -Format "yyyyMMddTHHmmss" 与 Get-Date -Format "yyyy-MM-dd ddd HH:mm"date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S 与 date "+%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M"New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force ~/Documents/notes | Out-Nullmkdir -p ~/Documents/notes~/Documents/notes/{时间戳}--{领域}的秩__rank.orgdevelopment
Use only when the user explicitly asks for swarm, subagents, parallel agents, dynamic workflow, multi-agent orchestration, 多智能体编排, or when the task truly needs coordinated research plus implementation plus review plus verification packets. Do not use for ordinary code review, planning-only work, single-line bugfixes, routine audits, or migrations unless orchestration is requested or at least two independent workflow dimensions are present.
development
Run a code quality review focused on maintainability, structure, abstraction quality, file growth, branching complexity, boundary cleanliness, and refactoring opportunities. Use when the user asks for code quality review, code review, maintainability review, architecture quality review, PR code quality feedback, 代码质量审查, 代码质量 review, 可维护性审查, 架构质量审查, or review comments about code structure. Do not use for pure security review, formatting-only review, performance profiling, or implementation tasks unless the user also asks for a code quality review.
development
Plan-first brainstorming workflow that turns an idea into an approved Markdown implementation plan by default. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, design, scope, or plan a feature/spec before implementation. Spark explores project context, asks only blocking questions, writes the plan under the project root's .plannings/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-slug.md path, self-reviews it, and waits for user approval. Create an HTML or visual plan/spec only when the user explicitly asks for HTML, browser-viewable, or visual output; save the paired .html beside the Markdown plan.
development
Run a code quality review focused on maintainability, structure, abstraction quality, file growth, branching complexity, boundary cleanliness, and refactoring opportunities. Use when the user asks for code quality review, code review, maintainability review, architecture quality review, PR code quality feedback, 代码质量审查, 代码质量 review, 可维护性审查, 架构质量审查, or review comments about code structure. Do not use for pure security review, formatting-only review, performance profiling, or implementation tasks unless the user also asks for a code quality review.