content/skills/development-workflows/project-daily-summary/SKILL.md
Use when the user wants a same-day work summary grouped by project folder or repository, combining today's coding sessions, extracted plans, completed items, commits, and uncommitted changes, or says 项目日报, 今日工作总结, 按项目总结今天, 总结今天所有会话, 总结今天会话+提交+未提交改动. Use this instead of commit-daily-summary when the user explicitly wants multi-project aggregation or session-level evidence beyond pure git commits.
npx skillsauth add bahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings project-daily-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Summarize today's coding work by project. Combine session evidence with git commits and uncommitted changes. Prioritize plans and final outcomes over process chatter.
Detect the user's language from their request:
Use the local machine date, not UTC.
Check for available session sources in this order:
~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/) → read $SKILL_DIR/references/codex-sessions.md for parsing details$SKILL_DIR/references/claude-code-sessions.mdIf multiple sources are available, combine them. If none are available, report that clearly and proceed with git-only mode.
For each project in scope:
Session evidence (platform-specific, see loaded reference):
Extract these signal types in priority order:
If a session source is available but parsing fails or returns empty, fall back to git evidence for that project and note (session data unavailable) in the output. Do not silently drop a project because session parsing failed.
Git evidence (universal):
git -C <repo> log --since="YYYY-MM-DD 00:00" --until="YYYY-MM-DD+1 00:00" --pretty=format:"%h %s"
git -C <repo> status --short
git -C <repo> diff --stat
Pre-check: Verify the directory is a git repository before running git commands. If not a repo, skip git evidence and rely on session evidence alone.
Read $SKILL_DIR/references/session-parsing.md for the universal signal extraction template and noise filtering rules.
For each session or working directory:
git -C <cwd> rev-parse --show-toplevel to find the project rootOutput one section per project, not one per session.
Within each project, merge multiple sessions or commit groups into a few major workstreams using these signals:
Target 1 to 5 workstreams per project, not dozens of entries.
Use the template below. Adjust section labels to match the output language.
Save policy:
AGENTS.md defines a daily-summary output directory, follow it.YYYY-MM-DD-project-daily.md# Project Daily Summary
日期:YYYY-MM-DD
## 总览
- 项目数:
- 会话数:
- 主要推进:
- 今日仍未收尾:
## 项目:<repo-or-folder>
- 分支 / 仓库:
- 今日目标:
- 今日计划提炼:
- 今日完成事项:
- 今日 commits:
- 当前未提交改动:
- 风险 / 未完成项:
- 建议下一步:
## 跨项目总结
- 今天最重要的推进
- 重复出现的问题
- 明天最值得先做的 1-3 件事
session-wrapcommit-daily-summarycommit-daily-summaryBefore responding, verify:
development
Use only when the user explicitly asks for swarm, subagents, parallel agents, dynamic workflow, multi-agent orchestration, 多智能体编排, or when the task truly needs coordinated research plus implementation plus review plus verification packets. Do not use for ordinary code review, planning-only work, single-line bugfixes, routine audits, or migrations unless orchestration is requested or at least two independent workflow dimensions are present.
development
Run a code quality review focused on maintainability, structure, abstraction quality, file growth, branching complexity, boundary cleanliness, and refactoring opportunities. Use when the user asks for code quality review, code review, maintainability review, architecture quality review, PR code quality feedback, 代码质量审查, 代码质量 review, 可维护性审查, 架构质量审查, or review comments about code structure. Do not use for pure security review, formatting-only review, performance profiling, or implementation tasks unless the user also asks for a code quality review.
development
Plan-first brainstorming workflow that turns an idea into an approved Markdown implementation plan by default. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, design, scope, or plan a feature/spec before implementation. Spark explores project context, asks only blocking questions, writes the plan under the project root's .plannings/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-slug.md path, self-reviews it, and waits for user approval. Create an HTML or visual plan/spec only when the user explicitly asks for HTML, browser-viewable, or visual output; save the paired .html beside the Markdown plan.
development
Run a code quality review focused on maintainability, structure, abstraction quality, file growth, branching complexity, boundary cleanliness, and refactoring opportunities. Use when the user asks for code quality review, code review, maintainability review, architecture quality review, PR code quality feedback, 代码质量审查, 代码质量 review, 可维护性审查, 架构质量审查, or review comments about code structure. Do not use for pure security review, formatting-only review, performance profiling, or implementation tasks unless the user also asks for a code quality review.