skills/research-learning-knowledge/deep-research-pro/SKILL.md
Multi-source deep research skill for current-topic investigation, comparison, and cited report writing. Use when the user asks to research, compare, or deep-dive a topic with current web sources and citations, including phrases like research, deep dive, latest, 调研, 做个深度研究, or 带来源总结. Do not use for offline-only codebase questions, casual opinion requests, or when the user explicitly forbids web access.
npx skillsauth add bahayonghang/my-claude-code-settings deep-research-proInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill to turn an open-ended topic into a grounded, cited research deliverable. The goal is not to dump links. The goal is to answer the user's real question with evidence, recency awareness, and explicit uncertainty.
Use this skill when the user wants:
Do not use this skill when:
Extract or infer:
Ask at most 1-2 clarifying questions only if the answer would materially change the search plan or final deliverable. If not, proceed with reasonable defaults and state them.
Create 3-5 sub-questions that cover the topic from different angles, such as:
Do not search blindly for the top-level topic only.
Use the current environment's available web tools. Prefer primary and high-signal sources in this order:
For each sub-question:
Aim for roughly 8-20 unique sources total unless the user requested a very lightweight answer.
Do not rely on snippets alone. Open and read the most relevant pages in full.
For each key source, extract:
If a claim appears only once, treat it as provisional instead of established.
Combine the evidence into a structured answer that:
If the user asks for recommendations, make it explicit which parts come from sources and which parts are your synthesis.
Default output structure:
# {Topic}
## Executive Summary
- 3-5 high-signal findings
## Key Findings
### {Theme 1}
...
### {Theme 2}
...
## Risks / Open Questions
...
## Sources
1. [Title](url) — source type, date
If the user asked for a saved report, write it to a user-specified path or a workspace-relative path. Do not assume a personal home-directory convention.
Research the current state of nuclear fusion commercializationCompare Rust vs Go for backend services in 2026 with sources帮我调研一下 AI coding agent 的市场格局,给出带来源总结What's the latest on the US housing market?development
Turn vague or complex Codex tasks into strong `/goal` commands with outcome, verification, constraints, boundaries, iteration policy, completion evidence, and pause/block conditions. Use when the user asks for Codex goal instructions, Goal 指令, 目标指令, `/goal` prompts, 中文 Goal 模板, plan-to-goal interviews, success criteria, verification commands, or bounded agent work definitions.
tools
Write, debug, and validate ast-grep structural code search rules. Use this skill when the user needs syntax-aware code search, AST pattern matching, structural refactor discovery, language-construct queries, or searches that plain text tools like rg can miss, such as finding functions with particular descendants, calls inside specific contexts, missing error handling, React hook shapes, decorators, or other Tree-sitter-backed code structures.
development
Use when the user asks to ground an ambitious proposal, avoid over-grand designs, make a bold direction executable, pressure-test feasibility, prevent "too much vision and too little landing", or turn a strategy/refactor/product idea into the smallest verifiable first move with stop rules. Trigger for requests such as 落地, 先落地, 别太飘, 收一收, 可执行, 可验证, 止损, and for follow-ups after geju-style big-picture thinking. Do not trigger for ordinary code review or implementation unless the user explicitly asks to ground or shrink the plan first.
development
Use when the user explicitly asks to think bigger, open up the design space, challenge conservative design, avoid over-indexing on backward compatibility, escape local-detail fixation, or make a bold high-level product or architecture direction call. Use for strategic reframing, not for ordinary code review, PRD writing, implementation planning, or adversarial risk review.