baekenough/post-release-followup

Post-Release Follow-up

Purpose

After PR creation in the auto-dev release workflow, collect unaddressed findings and present actionable follow-up recommendations. The user chooses: execute now, register as issues, or skip.

Workflow

1. Collect Follow-up Candidates

Gather unfinished work from multiple sources:

Source A — Remaining open issues:

• Run: gh issue list --label verify-done --state open --json number,title,labels
• These are triaged issues NOT included in the current release

Source B — Deep-verify findings:

• Read the latest deep-verify output from .claude/outputs/sessions/{today}/
• Extract any MEDIUM or LOW severity findings that were flagged but not fixed

Source C — Triage deferred items:

• Read the latest professor-triage output from .claude/outputs/sessions/{today}/
• Extract items explicitly marked as deferred or P3

Source D — TODO markers in changed files:

• Run: git diff develop...HEAD --name-only to get changed files
• Search changed files for TODO, FIXME, HACK markers added in this release

Source E — PR review feedback:

• Run: gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments and gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments
• Parse omc_pr_analyzer bot comments (Senior Architect, Project Colleague, Professor Synthesis)
• Extract findings categorized as Critical, High, Medium
• Identify: required fixes, recommended improvements, structural concerns

2. Deduplicate and Categorize

Remove duplicates (same issue referenced from multiple sources). Categorize:

| Category | Criteria | Default Action | |----------|----------|----------------| | 즉시 실행 | P1/P2 잔여 이슈, MEDIUM+ 검증 발견사항, Critical/High PR 리뷰 발견사항 | 즉시 실행 | | 이슈 등록 | P3 이슈, LOW 검증 발견사항, 새 TODO, Medium PR 리뷰 발견사항 | 이슈로 등록 | | 참고 | 이미 추적 중인 이슈, 외관 관련 메모 | 건너뛰기 |

3. Present to User

Display follow-up summary:

[Follow-up] {n}개 후속 작업 발견

━━━ 즉시 실행 추천 ({count}개) ━━━
  1. {description} — 출처: {source}
  2. {description} — 출처: {source}

━━━ 이슈 등록 추천 ({count}개) ━━━
  3. {description} — 출처: {source}
  4. {description} — 출처: {source}

━━━ 참고 사항 ({count}개) ━━━
  5. {description} — 이미 #{issue_number}로 추적 중

선택:
  [A] 추천대로 실행 (즉시 실행 + 이슈 등록)
  [B] 모두 즉시 실행
  [C] 모두 이슈 등록
  [D] 개별 선택 (항목별로 질문)
  [E] 건너뛰기

Use AskUserQuestion (or equivalent user prompt) to get the choice.

4. Process User Choice

Option A (추천대로):

• "Immediate" items → delegate to appropriate specialist agents for execution
• "Trackable" items → create GitHub issues via gh issue create
• "Informational" items → skip

Option B (모두 즉시 실행):

• All Immediate + Trackable items → delegate to specialist agents
• Follow implementation patterns from the release workflow

Option C (모두 이슈 등록):

• All Immediate + Trackable items → gh issue create with appropriate labels
• Label: professor for auto-triage in next workflow run

Option D (개별 선택):

• For each item, ask: [{n}] {description} — 실행(E) / 이슈(I) / 건너뛰기(S)?
• Process each per user choice

Option E (건너뛰기):

• Skip all follow-up actions
• Complete workflow

5. Report

[Follow-up Complete]
├── 즉시 실행: {n}개 완료
├── 이슈 등록: {n}개 (#{numbers})
├── 건너뛰기: {n}개
└── 총 처리: {total}개

Issue Creation Template

When creating follow-up issues:

gh issue create \
  --title "{간결한 설명}" \
  --body "## 출처\n\nv{version} 릴리즈 워크플로우에서 발견.\n\n## 컨텍스트\n\n{triage/verify에서의 상세 컨텍스트}\n\n## 권장 조치\n\n{권장 사항}" \
  --label "professor"

Add priority label (P1, P2, P3) based on categorization.

Notes

• This skill runs in the main conversation context (via workflow skill step)
• User interaction is expected — this is NOT a fully automated step
• All file modifications delegated to specialist subagents per R010
• Issue creation uses gh CLI directly (read-only operation pattern)
• If no follow-up candidates found, report "No follow-up actions needed" and complete
• PR review feedback is available shortly after PR creation — the omc_pr_analyzer bot comments automatically