workspace/skills/twitter-respond/SKILL.md
# Twitter Respond Skill **Skill ID**: twitter-respond **Category**: Social Media / Engagement **Feature**: 040-twitter-mentions ## Overview Enables bidirectional Twitter interaction by monitoring @mentions of @John_Capobianco and generating CCIE-level technical replies. All replies require human approval per Constitution Principle XIV. ## Capabilities 1. **Mention Detection** - Poll for @mentions and classify them 2. **Reply Generation** - Create context-aware, technically accurate replies
npx skillsauth add automateyournetwork/netclaw workspace/skills/twitter-respondInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Skill ID: twitter-respond Category: Social Media / Engagement Feature: 040-twitter-mentions
Enables bidirectional Twitter interaction by monitoring @mentions of @John_Capobianco and generating CCIE-level technical replies. All replies require human approval per Constitution Principle XIV.
This skill uses the twitter-mcp server's bidirectional tools:
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| twitter_get_mentions | Fetch recent @mentions |
| twitter_classify_mention | Categorize mention intent |
| twitter_get_conversation | Get thread context |
| twitter_generate_reply | Generate reply draft |
| twitter_reply_to_tweet | Post approved reply |
| twitter_mark_processed | Mark mention as handled |
| twitter_get_user_history | Get user interaction history |
Mentions are classified into:
1. Check Mentions → twitter_get_mentions
2. Classify Intent → twitter_classify_mention
3. Get Context → twitter_get_conversation (if thread)
4. Get User History → twitter_get_user_history
5. Generate Reply → twitter_generate_reply
6. Human Reviews → [Approval Required]
7. Post Reply → twitter_reply_to_tweet (approved=true)
8. Mark Processed → twitter_mark_processed
User: "Check my Twitter mentions"
NetClaw: Found 3 new mentions:
1. @alice_neteng: "@John_Capobianco what's the best way to debug BGP peering?"
Category: technical_network
2. @random_user: "@John_Capobianco check out this crypto deal!"
Category: spam (skipping)
3. @cisco_fan: "@John_Capobianco can NetClaw generate topology diagrams?"
Category: netclaw_request
User: "Reply to the BGP question"
NetClaw: Here's my suggested reply:
"@alice_neteng Start with: 1) show ip bgp summary - check state
2) show ip bgp neighbors - verify open/sent/rcvd messages
3) debug ip bgp events - watch notifications
Common issues: AS mismatch, source IP, eBGP multihop. #netclaw"
Post this reply? [Yes/No/Edit]
User: "Yes"
NetClaw: Reply posted: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/123456789
Environment variables in ~/.openclaw/.env:
# Required (from feature 039)
TWITTER_API_KEY=your_consumer_key
TWITTER_API_SECRET=your_consumer_secret
TWITTER_ACCESS_TOKEN=your_access_token
TWITTER_ACCESS_SECRET=your_access_secret
# Optional mention polling
TWITTER_MENTION_POLL_INTERVAL=300 # Check every 5 minutes
Per Constitution Principle XIV (Human-in-the-Loop for External Communications):
approved=true parameter required for twitter_reply_to_tweetUsing pay-as-you-go Twitter API tier:
| Action | Cost | |--------|------| | Check mentions | ~$0.01 | | Get conversation | ~$0.01 | | Post reply | ~$0.01 | | Full interaction | ~$0.03-0.05 |
With $5 credit, expect ~100-150 interactions.
Heuristics to filter spam accounts:
tools
Federate your NetClaw with other NetClaw operators over the BGP mesh — exchange capability inventories and ask your claw what a peer can do. (US1; remote invocation and chat land in later phases.)
tools
3D network topology visualization and interactive digital twin in Unreal Engine 5.8 via the built-in UE5 MCP server.
testing
Human-in-the-loop escalation via HumanRail — route low-confidence agent decisions, pre-destructive operation approvals, and ambiguous incident tickets to real human engineers. Human answers are verified and returned as structured output. Workers are paid via Lightning Network. Use when the agent is uncertain, when a destructive change needs explicit human sign-off beyond a ServiceNow CR, or when an ambiguous ticket requires human triage before automated handling.
testing
IPv4 and IPv6 subnet calculator - CIDR breakdown, usable hosts, previous/next subnets, address classification, VLSM planning, and dual-stack analysis. Use when calculating subnets, figuring out how many hosts fit in a prefix, planning IP addressing, getting wildcard masks for ACLs, or checking if two IPs are in the same subnet.