.claude/skills/solver/SKILL.md
How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invariants enforced during mutation, and practical workflows for debugging and extending the solver. Use when implementing or modifying constraint solving, parameter bounds, or debugging expression simplification.
npx skillsauth add atopile/atopile solverInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The solver is the heart of atopile's parameter subsystem: it symbolically simplifies and checks constraint systems built from Parameters, Literals (Sets), and Expressions.
If you are touching solver internals, read these first:
src/faebryk/core/solver/README.md (concepts, set correlation, append-only graphs, canonicalization)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py (the actual invariants enforced during expression insertion)import faebryk.core.node as fabll
import faebryk.library._F as F
from faebryk.core.solver.defaultsolver import DefaultSolver
from faebryk.libs.test.boundexpressions import BoundExpressions
E = BoundExpressions()
class _App(fabll.Node):
x = F.Parameters.NumericParameter.MakeChild(unit=E.U.dl)
app = _App.bind_typegraph(tg=E.tg).create_instance(g=E.g)
x = app.x.get().can_be_operand.get()
E.is_subset(x, E.lit_op_range(((9, E.U.dl), (11, E.U.dl))), assert_=True)
solver = DefaultSolver()
res = solver.simplify(g=E.g, tg=E.tg, terminal=True).data.mutation_map
lit = res.try_extract_superset(app.x.get().is_parameter_operatable.get(), domain_default=True)
assert lit is not None
src/faebryk/core/solver/defaultsolver.py (DefaultSolver, iteration loop, terminal vs non-terminal)src/faebryk/core/solver/solver.py (solver protocol + helper APIs)src/faebryk/core/solver/mutator.py (Mutator, Transformations, MutationStage, MutationMap, tracebacks)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py (insert_expression(...) invariant pipeline)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/canonical.py (canonicalization passes)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/* (structural + expression-wise algorithms)src/faebryk/library/Parameters.py (ParameterOperatables, domains, compact repr)src/faebryk/library/Expressions.py (expression node types, predicates, assertables)src/faebryk/library/Literals.py (Sets; numeric/boolean/enum literals)src/faebryk/libs/test/boundexpressions.py (concise graph + expression construction for tests)src/faebryk/library/): define parameters/constraints (e.g. R.resistance)ato constraints into solver expressions100kOhm +/- 10% is a Set (a range), not a scalar.X - X is not necessarily {0} when X is a range, but is {0} when X is a singleton.Parameter behaves like a mathematical symbol (variable), not a Python variable.Is(A, B).assert_() / A.alias_is(B) creates a strong “these are the same” correlation.IsSubset(A, X).assert_() / A.constrain_subset(X) constrains A to be within X.IsSubset(X, A).assert_() / A.constrain_superset(X) constrains A to accept at least X.Expressions are nodes in the Faebryk graph that point at operand nodes. This matters because…
The solver cannot “edit” an expression in-place. Instead it:
MutationMap),BoundExpressions).DefaultSolver().simplify(...) and inspect the resulting MutationMap.src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression.src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/* (most logic lives there, not in mutator.py).test/core/solver/:
test/core/solver/test_solver.pytest/core/solver/test_literal_folding.pytest/core/solver/test_solver_util.pyRun a tight loop while iterating:
ato dev test --llm test/core/solver -k invariant -qato dev test --llm test/core/solver/test_solver.py::test_simplify -qsimplify(...) argumentsDefaultSolver.simplify has a compatibility layer that accepts (tg, g) or (g, tg). In new code, prefer named args:
res = DefaultSolver().simplify(g=g, tg=tg, terminal=True)
mutation_map = res.data.mutation_map
Mutator/insert_expression pipeline, not ad-hoc rewritesWhen you “create” or “rewrite” an expression, you are really requesting that the solver insert something into the transient graph while upholding invariants. The canonical place where this happens is:
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expressionIf you bypass this, you will almost certainly violate an invariant and get:
insert_expression)The invariant pipeline is sequencing-sensitive. At a high level it enforces (paraphrased):
Op(P!, ...) is rewritten to use boolean literals where possibleP{S|True} -> P!; P!{S/P|False} -> Contradiction; P!{S|True} -> P!f(A{S|{x}}, ...) -> f(x, ...)When adding a new algorithm, the easiest way to stay correct is to construct a new ExpressionBuilder
and let insert_expression do the hard work.
DefaultSolver() holds state: when called with terminal=False, it can keep a reusable internal state for incremental solving.terminal=True (default) is more powerful but not intended to be reused as incremental state.terminal=False runs only non-terminal algorithms and stores reusable_state for subsequent calls.simplify(..., relevant=[...]) is the intended hook to avoid “solve the entire world”.MutationStage: one algorithm application over an input graph → output graph, with a Transformations object.MutationMap: a chain of stages; lets you:
map_forward)map_backward)try_extract_superset; subset extraction is typically via the mapped operable’s try_extract_subset())Traceback in mutator.py)Useful config flags (see src/faebryk/core/solver/utils.py):
SLOG=1: debug logging for solver/mutatorSPRINT_START=1: log start of each phaseSVERBOSE_TABLE=1: verbose mutation tablesSSHOW_SS_IS=1: include subset/is predicates in graph printoutsSMAX_ITERATIONS=N: raise early if stuck looping (helps catch bad rewrites)In failures, look for Contradiction / ContradictionByLiteral output: it prints mutation tracebacks back to
origin expressions/parameters, which is usually the shortest path to the actual bug.
relevant=[...] when you can.development
# SEXP Benchmark Strategy ## Goal Measure and improve S-expression pipeline performance with a focus on: - Throughput per stage - Peak memory per stage - End-to-end behavior on realistic KiCad PCB inputs ## Pipeline Stages Benchmark these layers separately: - `tokenizer` - `ast` - `parser` (typed decode) - `encode` (typed encode to raw SEXP) - `pretty` (formatting) ## Dataset Dimensions Use a matrix over: - `depth`: shallow vs deep nesting - `size`: small, medium, large Recommended size buck
development
How the Zig S-expression engine and typed KiCad models work, how they are exposed to Python (pyzig_sexp), and the invariants around parsing, formatting, and freeing. Use when working with KiCad file parsing, S-expression generation, or layout sync.
tools
How the Zig↔Python binding layer works (pyzig), including build-on-import, wrapper generation patterns, ownership rules, and where to add new exported APIs. Use when adding Zig-Python bindings, modifying native extensions, or debugging C-API interactions.
testing
Spec-driven planning for complex design tasks: when to plan, how to write specs as .ato files, and how to verify against requirements.