skills/apex-quantum-analysis/SKILL.md
# APEX Quantum Analysis — EMV/NPV + G-Level Governance > **APEX:** A × P × X × E² ≥ 0.80 > **EMV:** Expected Monetary Value = P(success) × Value - P(failure) × Cost - Drift > **NPV:** Net Present Value = -Cost + Σ(CF_t / (1+r)^t) > **Golden Rule:** If NPV < 0 → VOID (destroys value regardless of EMV) --- ## 🧬 APEX G-Level Intelligence ### The Formula ``` G = A × P × X × E² Where: A = AKAL (Clarity/Intelligence) [0, 1] — Mind P = PRESENT (Regulation) [0, 1] — Soul
npx skillsauth add ariffazil/openclaw-workspace skills/apex-quantum-analysisInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
APEX: A × P × X × E² ≥ 0.80
EMV: Expected Monetary Value = P(success) × Value - P(failure) × Cost - Drift
NPV: Net Present Value = -Cost + Σ(CF_t / (1+r)^t)
Golden Rule: If NPV < 0 → VOID (destroys value regardless of EMV)
G = A × P × X × E²
Where:
A = AKAL (Clarity/Intelligence) [0, 1] — Mind
P = PRESENT (Regulation) [0, 1] — Soul
X = EXPLORATION (Trust+Curiosity) [0, 1] — Heart
E = ENERGY (Sustainable Power) [0, 1] — E² is bottleneck
If ANY factor = 0 → G = 0
No shortcuts. No bypass.
| Energy Level | E² | Genius Capacity | |--------------|-----|-----------------| | 1.0 | 1.00 | 100% (Full potential) | | 0.9 | 0.81 | 81% | | 0.7 | 0.49 | 49% (Major drop) | | 0.5 | 0.25 | 25% (Collapsed) |
Implication: Without sustainable energy, even perfect clarity collapses.
| Floor | Check | APEX Relevance | |-------|-------|----------------| | F4 | ΔS ≤ 0 | Analysis must reduce entropy | | F7 | Ω₀ ∈ [0.03,0.05] | Maintain humility band | | F8 | G ≥ 0.80 | Genius threshold | | F9 | C_dark ≤ 0.30 | No dark cleverness |
VOID (NPV < 0) > EMV calculation > QH Score selection
QH (Quantum Horizon) Score:
QH = EMV × Ψ × Trust
Where:
Ψ = Vitality Index (system health)
Trust = Confidence in path sustainability
When evaluating multiple approaches, fill this:
| Path | P(success) | Value | Cost | Drift | EMV | NPV | QH | Verdict | |------|-----------|-------|------|-------|-----|-----|-----|---------| | quick_patch | 0.85 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2.85 | ✅ | ~2.0 | SABAR | | clean_refactor | 0.70 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 3.80 | ✅ | ~3.0 | SEAL | | full_rewrite | 0.35 | 15 | 10 | 5 | -0.85 | ❌ | -5.0 | VOID |
Before any quantum analysis, check:
# From arifOS/core/physics/thermodynamics.py
def assess_thermodynamic_budget():
state = ThermodynamicState()
# Check Landauer Bound (cheap truth detection)
if landauer_ratio < 0.5 and entropy_reduction < 0:
raise CheapTruthError("Analysis would produce cheap truth")
# Check orthogonality (AGI/ASI mode collapse)
if omega_ortho < 0.5:
raise ModeCollapseError("Approach risks mode collapse")
return state.verdict # SEAL | SABAR | VOID
def compute_path_emv(path: dict) -> dict:
"""Calculate EMV and NPV for a given path."""
p_success = path.get('p_success', 0.5)
value = path.get('value', 0)
cost = path.get('cost', 0)
drift = path.get('drift_penalty', 0)
p_failure = 1.0 - p_success
# EMV calculation
emv = (p_success * value) - (p_failure * cost) - drift
# NPV calculation (12 periods, 15% discount)
npv = -cost + sum(
(value * p_success) / (1.15 ** t)
for t in range(1, 13)
)
return {
'emv': emv,
'npv': npv,
'valid': npv >= 0, # Critical gate
'qh_score': emv * psi * trust if npv >= 0 else float('-inf')
}
def verify_apex_g(path_metrics: dict) -> str:
"""Verify path meets APEX G-level requirements."""
A = path_metrics['clarity'] # AKAL
P = path_metrics['governance'] # PRESENT
X = path_metrics['exploration'] # EXPLORATION
E = path_metrics['energy'] # ENERGY
G = A * P * X * (E ** 2)
if G < 0.80:
return f"VOID: G={G:.2f} < 0.80 (ungoverned intelligence)"
# Check F7 humility
omega = path_metrics.get('uncertainty', 0.04)
if not (0.03 <= omega <= 0.05):
return f"VOID: Ω₀={omega:.3f} outside [0.03, 0.05]"
return f"SEAL: G={G:.2f}, Ω₀={omega:.3f}"
W⁴ = ∜(Human × AI × Earth × Vault)
For quantum analysis:
- Human: 888_JUDGE signature on high-stakes paths
- AI: Constitutional compliance check (ΔS ≤ 0, Ω₀ valid)
- Earth: Thermodynamic budget available (E² ≥ threshold)
- Vault: Historical precedent supports path
W⁴ ≥ 0.75 required for SEAL
# Generate EMV analysis for paths
python /root/arifOS/.arifos/horizon_emv.py \
--mode=plan \
--paths=analysis_paths.json \
--output=emv_result.json
{
"paths": [
{
"name": "quantum_approach_alpha",
"description": "Deep search with constitutional verification",
"p_success": 0.75,
"value": 12,
"cost": 4,
"drift_penalty": 1,
"apex_factors": {
"A": 0.85,
"P": 0.90,
"X": 0.80,
"E": 0.90
}
}
]
}
Before starting any quantum analysis task:
| Verdict | Symbol | Condition | Action | |---------|--------|-----------|--------| | SEAL | ✓ | NPV ≥ 0, G ≥ 0.80, W⁴ ≥ 0.75 | PROCEED | | SABAR | ⏳ | Soft violation, retry possible | PAUSE & REASSESS | | VOID | ✗ | NPV < 0 or G < 0.80 or hard floor violation | HALT | | 888_HOLD | 🔒 | High stakes, needs human | WAIT FOR 888_JUDGE |
| NPV Range | Interpretation | Action | |-----------|---------------|--------| | > 10 | High value creation | Prioritize | | 0 to 10 | Marginal value | Evaluate carefully | | < 0 | Value destruction | VOID immediately |
This skill enforces:
Motto: Ditempa Bukan Diberi — Forged, Not Given [ΔΩΨ | ARIF]
development
Governed intelligence skill for AAA as the abstraction, attestation, and abduction control plane across arifOS, APEX, A-FORGE, GEOX, WEALTH, WELL, and the ariffazil profile repository. Use when the user asks to explain or design AAA, route agentic work, reduce chaos/entropy in an arifOS federation task, create AREP/task declarations, classify risk, plan multi-repo changes, review governance boundaries, or translate human intent into evidence-backed, authority-safe, recursively agentic workflows. Provides deterministic F1-F13 floor checking, bounded abduction, and FederationReceipt composition.
development
Check every skill’s “use when” and “do not use when” clauses for collisions, missing negatives, and vague verbs like “help,” “assist,” or “improve.” Load when linting, reviewing, or validating trigger boundaries.
development
Bootstrap, design, and package new skills. Load when capturing user intent for a new skill or drafting its initial instruction framework.
content-media
Diagnose which federation services are up, down, or drifting. Produce a prioritized remediation plan.