arbazkhan971/scale

Scale -- Scalability Engineering

Activate When

• /godmode:scale, "scaling", "auto-scale", "read replica"
• "rate limiting", "capacity planning", "too slow"
• Load testing reveals bottlenecks or saturation alerts

Workflow

Step 1: Scalability Assessment

SCALABILITY CONTEXT:
Architecture: Monolith | Microservices | Serverless
Current Scale: <RPS, concurrent users, data volume>
Target Scale: <target RPS, users, volume>
Bottleneck: CPU | Memory | I/O | Network | DB | API
SLA: <latency p50/p99, availability>
Database: <type, size, read/write ratio>
Peak vs Baseline: <ratio>

Step 2: Horizontal vs Vertical Decision

IF single-threaded workload: scale UP
IF DB write bottleneck AND not at ceiling: scale UP
IF at instance ceiling: scale OUT
IF stateless app tier AND read-heavy: scale OUT
IF peak-to-baseline ratio > 5x: scale OUT
IF need fault tolerance: scale OUT
WHEN quick fix needed AND below ceiling: scale UP first

Step 3: Auto-Scaling

# K8s HPA — target CPU 70%, memory 80%
kubectl autoscale deployment myapp \
  --cpu-percent=70 --min=2 --max=20

# Check current HPA status
kubectl get hpa myapp -o wide

POLICIES:
  Scale out:  CPU >70% for 3min -> +2 instances
  Scale fast: CPU >90% for 1min -> +4 instances
  Scale in:   CPU <30% for 10min -> -1 instance
  Stabilization: scale-up 60s, scale-down 300s
  KEDA for event-driven (queue depth, Prometheus)

Step 4: DB Read Replicas & Write Splitting

Primary (Writer) -> Replica 1, 2, 3 (Read)
  Writes -> primary | Strong reads -> primary
  Eventually-consistent reads -> replica (round-robin)
  Read-after-write -> primary for 5s, then replica
IF replication lag > 500ms: route reads to primary
IF lag > 2s: circuit breaker, alert, investigate

Step 5: Connection Pooling at Scale

Formula: pool_size = (core_count * 2) + 1
Start small (10-20), monitor wait time
Problem: 100 instances * 20 pool = 2000 connections
Solution: PgBouncer multiplexes 2000 app -> 100 DB
  pool_mode = transaction
  default_pool_size = 50
  max_client_conn = 2000
  max_db_connections = 100

Step 6: Rate Limiting & Backpressure

RATE LIMITING:
  API Gateway: Token bucket, 1000 req/min per key
  Per-user:    Sliding window, 100 req/min
  Per-endpoint: Fixed window, 50 req/min
  Global:      Leaky bucket, 10000 req/min
  Burst: 100 tokens/sec refill, bucket 200

BACKPRESSURE:
  Bounded queues (reject when full)
  Load shedding priority:
    health > auth > critical > standard > background
  Circuit breaker on failing dependencies

Response: 429 + Retry-After + X-RateLimit-* headers.

Step 7: Capacity Planning

# Measure current utilization
kubectl top pods --sort-by=cpu
kubectl top nodes

# Project headroom
echo "At 70% CPU threshold, runway = ..."

1. Measure baseline under normal load
2. Project growth (3/6/12 month)
3. Identify ceiling per component
4. Calculate runway (when each hits 70%/90%)
5. Plan scaling actions with cost estimates

Step 8: Caching Strategy

LAYERS:
  CDN: static 24h, API 60s
  Application: Redis, TTL-based
  Query: in-process 30s
PATTERNS: Cache-aside | Write-through | Write-behind
Target >95% hit rate
Stampede: locking, probabilistic early refresh

Key Behaviors

1. Measure before scaling. Profile the bottleneck.
2. Scale the bottleneck, not everything.
3. Stateless is prerequisite. Externalize state.
4. Auto-scaling needs tuning. Defaults are bad.
5. Connection pools are the hidden bottleneck.
6. Cache with purpose. Measure hit rates.
7. Never ask to continue. Loop autonomously.

HARD RULES

1. NEVER scale without measuring the bottleneck first.
2. NEVER store state in application instances.
3. EVERY auto-scaling policy must have cooldown.
4. NEVER set pool_size * instances >= DB max_connections.
5. ALWAYS load test at 2x projected peak.
6. EVERY scaling change must include cost estimate.
7. Rate limits MUST include X-RateLimit-* headers.

Auto-Detection

ls docker-compose.yml k8s/ terraform/ 2>/dev/null
grep -r "pgbouncer\|ProxySQL\|redis\|memcached" . \
  --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" -l 2>/dev/null
kubectl get hpa 2>/dev/null

Iterative Loop

FOR EACH bottleneck:
  1. Measure -> 2. Choose strategy -> 3. Implement
  4. Load test at 2x peak -> 5. Measure improvement
  IF improvement < 20%: wrong bottleneck, re-measure
  IF improvement >= 20%: commit
  IF cost exceeds budget: optimize first

TSV Logging

Log to .godmode/scale-results.tsv: timestamp\tsystem\tcurrent_rps\ttarget_rps\tbottleneck\tdirection\tcost_delta_pct\tverdict

Output Format

Print: Scale: {bottleneck}. Strategy: {horizontal|vertical|caching}. Capacity: {before} -> {after}. Cost: {est}. Status: {DONE|PARTIAL}.

Keep/Discard Discipline

KEEP if: capacity improved AND latency maintained
  AND cost within budget
DISCARD if: latency regressed OR cost exceeds budget
  OR auto-scaler flapping. Revert on discard.

Stop Conditions

STOP when ALL of:
  - Target capacity met with acceptable latency
  - Auto-scaling configured and tested
  - Cost within budget with headroom for spikes