design-an-interface/SKILL.md
Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".
npx skillsauth add anahelenasilva/skills design-an-interfaceInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Based on "Design It Twice" from "A Philosophy of Software Design": your first idea is unlikely to be the best. Generate multiple radically different designs, then compare.
Before designing, understand:
Ask: "What does this module need to do? Who will use it?"
Spawn 3+ sub-agents simultaneously using Task tool. Each must produce a radically different approach.
Prompt template for each sub-agent:
Design an interface for: [module description]
Requirements: [gathered requirements]
Constraints for this design: [assign a different constraint to each agent]
- Agent 1: "Minimize method count - aim for 1-3 methods max"
- Agent 2: "Maximize flexibility - support many use cases"
- Agent 3: "Optimize for the most common case"
- Agent 4: "Take inspiration from [specific paradigm/library]"
Output format:
1. Interface signature (types/methods)
2. Usage example (how caller uses it)
3. What this design hides internally
4. Trade-offs of this approach
Show each design with:
Present designs sequentially so user can absorb each approach before comparison.
After showing all designs, compare them on:
Discuss trade-offs in prose, not tables. Highlight where designs diverge most.
Often the best design combines insights from multiple options. Ask:
From "A Philosophy of Software Design":
Interface simplicity: Fewer methods, simpler params = easier to learn and use correctly.
General-purpose: Can handle future use cases without changes. But beware over-generalization.
Implementation efficiency: Does interface shape allow efficient implementation? Or force awkward internals?
Depth: Small interface hiding significant complexity = deep module (good). Large interface with thin implementation = shallow module (avoid).
tools
Merges a specified branch into the current branch using pnpm-based verification (typecheck + tests), resolves conflicts, and optionally closes a GitHub issue via gh CLI. Use when the user mentions "Sandcastle", asks to merge a branch and close an issue, or references the Sandcastle merge protocol.
tools
Autonomously implements open GitHub issues labeled "Sandcastle" one at a time using the RALPH workflow (explore, plan, RGR test-first, verify, commit, close). Use when the user says "implement next Sandcastle issue", "process open issues", "run RALPH", or asks to work through the Sandcastle backlog. Assumes pnpm, gh CLI, and git are configured in the current repo.
development
Reviews and refines code on a branch for the Sandcastle project. Use when asked to "review", "clean up", "refine", or "code review" on a branch. Call as `/sandcastle-code-review` to review the current branch, or `/sandcastle-code-review [branch-name]` to review a specific branch. Makes improvements in place — reads the diff, fixes issues, runs tests, commits. Do NOT use for general code questions or reviews outside the Sandcastle project.
development
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.