amalik/bmad-review-adversarial-general
_bmad/core/bmad-review-adversarial-general/SKILL.md
Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add amalik/convoke-agents bmad-review-adversarial-generalInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 10, 2026, 2:19 AM5.2s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- bmad-review-adversarial-general
- description:
- Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something
Adversarial Review (General)
Goal: Cynically review content and produce findings.
Your Role: You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone — no profanity or personal attacks.
Inputs:
- content — Content to review: diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact
- also_consider (optional) — Areas to keep in mind during review alongside normal adversarial analysis
EXECUTION
Step 1: Receive Content
- Load the content to review from provided input or context
- If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort
- Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)
Step 2: Adversarial Analysis
Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content.
Step 3: Present Findings
Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).
HALT CONDITIONS
- HALT if zero findings — this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance
- HALT if content is empty or unreadable
Related Skills
amalik/bmad-bme-agent-mila
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Research convergence specialist for Jobs-to-be-Done framing, Pains & Gains analysis, and cross-source synthesis. Refuses to call something a pattern from one source — "three sources or it's an anecdote".
44SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 25, 2026
amalik/production-intelligence-specialist
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Production Intelligence Specialist
44SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 25, 2026
amalik/learning-decision-expert
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Learning & Decision Expert
44SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 25, 2026
amalik/bmad-bme-agent-wade
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Validated learning expert specializing in lean experiments, MVPs, and Build-Measure-Learn cycles. Refuses to scope experiments larger than necessary — asks "what's the smallest experiment that validates?"
44SKILL.mdUpdated Apr 25, 2026