marketing-skill/skills/x-twitter-growth/SKILL.md
X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills x-twitter-growthInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
X-specific growth skill. For general social media content across platforms, see social-content. For social strategy and calendar planning, see social-media-manager. This skill goes deep on X.
| Need | Use | |------|-----| | Write a tweet or thread | This skill | | Plan content across LinkedIn + X + Instagram | social-content | | Analyze engagement metrics across platforms | social-media-analyzer | | Build overall social strategy | social-media-manager | | X-specific growth, algorithm, competitive intel | This skill |
Before any growth work, audit the current X presence. Run scripts/profile_auditor.py with the handle, or manually assess:
Run: python3 scripts/profile_auditor.py --handle @username
Research competitors and successful accounts in your niche using web search.
site:x.com "topic" min_faves:100 via Brave to find high-performing contentpython3 scripts/competitor_analyzer.py --handles @acc1 @acc2 @acc3Structure:
- Tweet 1: Hook — must stop the scroll in <7 words
- Tweet 2: Context or promise ("Here's what I learned:")
- Tweets 3-N: One idea per tweet, each standalone-worthy
- Final tweet: Summary + explicit CTA ("Follow @handle for more")
- Reply to tweet 1: Restate hook + "Follow for more [topic]"
Rules:
- 5-12 tweets optimal (under 5 feels thin, over 12 loses people)
- Each tweet should make sense if read alone
- Use line breaks for readability
- No tweet should be a wall of text (3-4 lines max)
- Number the tweets or use "↓" in tweet 1
Formats that work:
- Observation: "[Thing] is underrated. Here's why:"
- Listicle: "10 tools I use daily:\n\n1. X — for Y"
- Contrarian: "Unpopular opinion: [statement]"
- Lesson: "I [did X] for [time]. Biggest lesson:"
- Framework: "[Concept] explained in 30 seconds:"
Rules:
- Under 200 characters gets more engagement
- One idea per tweet
- No links in tweet body (kills reach — put link in reply)
- Question tweets drive replies (algorithm loves replies)
Formula: Original tweet + your unique take
- Add data the original missed
- Provide counterpoint or nuance
- Share personal experience that validates/contradicts
- Never just say "This" or "So true"
Strategy:
- Reply to accounts 2-10x your size
- Add genuine value, not "great post!"
- Be first to reply on accounts with large audiences
- Your reply IS your content — make it tweet-worthy
- Controversial/insightful replies get quote-tweeted (free reach)
Run: python3 scripts/tweet_composer.py --type thread --topic "your topic" --audience "your audience"
| Signal | Weight | Action | |--------|--------|--------| | Replies received | Very high | Write reply-worthy content (questions, debates) | | Time spent reading | High | Threads, longer tweets with line breaks | | Profile visits from tweet | High | Curiosity gaps, tease expertise | | Bookmarks | High | Tactical, save-worthy content (lists, frameworks) | | Retweets/Quotes | Medium | Shareable insights, bold takes | | Likes | Low-medium | Easy agreement, relatable content | | Link clicks | Low (penalized) | Never put links in tweet body — use reply |
| Account size | Tweets/day | Threads/week | Replies/day | |-------------|------------|--------------|-------------| | < 1K followers | 2-3 | 1-2 | 10-20 | | 1K-10K | 3-5 | 2-3 | 5-15 | | 10K-50K | 3-7 | 2-4 | 5-10 | | 50K+ | 2-5 | 1-3 | 5-10 |
python3 scripts/growth_tracker.py --handle @username --period 30dRun: python3 scripts/content_planner.py --niche "your niche" --frequency 5 --weeks 2
Generates a 2-week posting plan with:
| Script | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| scripts/profile_auditor.py | Audit X profile: bio, pinned, activity patterns |
| scripts/tweet_composer.py | Generate tweets/threads with hook patterns |
| scripts/competitor_analyzer.py | Analyze competitor accounts via web search |
| scripts/content_planner.py | Generate weekly/monthly content calendars |
| scripts/growth_tracker.py | Track follower growth and engagement trends |
social-content — Multi-platform content creationsocial-media-manager — Overall social strategysocial-media-analyzer — Cross-platform analyticscontent-production — Long-form content that feeds X threadscopywriting — Headline and hook writing techniquesdata-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.