engineering/write-a-skill/skills/write-a-skill/SKILL.md
Create new agent skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, build, or author a new skill.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills write-a-skillInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Derived from Matt Pocock's write-a-skill (MIT). Matt's voice and 3-phase workflow preserved verbatim. Additions: validation tools + references + cs-* wrapper (see Tooling + Companions below).
Gather requirements - ask user about:
Draft the skill - create:
Review with user - present draft and ask:
skill-name/
├── SKILL.md # Main instructions (required)
├── REFERENCE.md # Detailed docs (if needed)
├── EXAMPLES.md # Usage examples (if needed)
└── scripts/ # Utility scripts (if needed)
└── helper.js
---
name: skill-name
description: Brief description of capability. Use when [specific triggers].
---
# Skill Name
## Quick start
[Minimal working example]
## Workflows
[Step-by-step processes with checklists for complex tasks]
## Advanced features
[Link to separate files: See [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md)]
The description is the only thing your agent sees when deciding which skill to load. It's surfaced in the system prompt alongside all other installed skills. Your agent reads these descriptions and picks the relevant skill based on the user's request.
Goal: Give your agent just enough info to know:
Format:
Good example:
Extract text and tables from PDF files, fill forms, merge documents. Use when working with PDF files or when user mentions PDFs, forms, or document extraction.
Bad example:
Helps with documents.
The bad example gives your agent no way to distinguish this from other document skills.
Add utility scripts when:
Scripts save tokens and improve reliability vs generated code.
Split into separate files when:
After drafting, verify:
Validation tools + cs-* wrapper sit alongside this skill. Run all 6 review-checklist items programmatically:
python scripts/skill_review_checklist_runner.py path/to/skill-folder
See references/companion_tooling.md for the tool catalogue, cs-skill-author persona agent, and /cs:write-a-skill slash command.
Version: 1.0.0 Derived: Matt Pocock (MIT) + this repo's wrapper
data-ai
Use when you want to understand what Claude contributed vs what you drove in a session. Triggers on: /collab-proof, session retrospective, ai contribution analysis, collaboration evidence, what did claude do.
data-ai
Personal coach that teaches users to become Claude power users. Use this skill the FIRST time a user asks to "learn Claude", "be a power user", "coach me", "teach me Claude tricks", "what can Claude do", "make me better at prompting", or any variation. After activation, also use it on EVERY subsequent turn to detect missed optimization opportunities (vague prompts, ignored capabilities, manual work Claude could automate) and surface a single power-user tip. Trigger generously — most users do not know what they do not know, so err on the side of coaching.
development
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
testing
Use when a startup is approached by a prospective partner and someone has to decide should we sign this partner, at what partner tier (referral / reseller / OEM / SI-consulting / strategic alliance), with what joint GTM commitment, and at what revshare. Classifies partner tier from independent-demand evidence vs. preferential-terms hunting, designs a 90-day joint GTM plan, models revshare against direct-sale margin, and surfaces kill criteria for unwinding under-performing partnerships. For Head of Partnerships, Head of BD, and Founder-CEOs doing reseller agreement, OEM deal, or strategic alliance review — not technical sale enablement, not channel cost economics, not M&A.