project-management/skills/team-communications/SKILL.md
Write internal company communications — 3P updates (Progress/Plans/Problems), company-wide newsletters, FAQ roundups, incident reports, leadership updates, status reports, project updates, and general internal comms. Use this skill any time the user asks to draft, edit, or format something meant for internal audiences. Trigger on keywords like "3P", "weekly update", "newsletter", "FAQ", "internal comms", "status report", "company update", "team update", "incident report", or any request to summarize work for leadership, teammates, or the broader company. Even casual requests like "write my update" or "summarize what my team did this week" should trigger this skill.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills team-communicationsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Originally contributed by maximcoding — enhanced and integrated by the claude-skills team.
Write polished internal communications by loading the right reference file, gathering context, and outputting in the company's exact format.
Identify the communication type from the user's request, then read the matching reference file before writing anything:
| Type | Trigger phrases | Reference file |
|---|---|---|
| 3P Update | "3P", "progress plans problems", "weekly team update", "what did we ship" | references/3p-updates.md |
| Newsletter | "newsletter", "company update", "weekly/monthly roundup", "all-hands summary" | references/company-newsletter.md |
| FAQ | "FAQ", "common questions", "what people are asking", "confusion around" | references/faq-answers.md |
| General | anything internal that doesn't match above | references/general-comms.md |
If the type is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question — don't guess.
If the user hasn't connected Slack, Gmail, Drive, or Calendar, don't stall. Ask them to paste or describe what they want covered. You're formatting and sharpening — that's still valuable. Mention which tools would improve future drafts so they can connect them later.
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach | |---|---|---| | Writing updates without reading the reference template first | Output won't match company format — user has to reformat | Always load the matching reference file before drafting | | Inventing metrics or accomplishments | Internal comms must be factual — fabrication destroys trust | Only include data the user provided or MCP tools retrieved | | Using passive voice for accomplishments | "The feature was shipped" hides who did the work | "Team X shipped the feature" — active voice credits the team | | Writing walls of text for status updates | Leadership scans, doesn't read — key info gets buried | Lead with the headline, follow with 3-5 bullet points | | Sending without confirming audience | A team update reads differently from a company-wide newsletter | Always confirm: who will read this? |
| Skill | Relationship |
|-------|-------------|
| project-management/senior-pm | Broader PM scope — status reports feed into PM reporting |
| project-management/meeting-analyzer | Meeting insights can feed into 3P updates and status reports |
| project-management/confluence-expert | Publish comms as Confluence pages for permanent record |
| marketing-skill/content-production | External comms — use for public-facing content, not internal |
tools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.