alirezarezvani/status
engineering-team/self-improving-agent/skills/status/SKILL.md
Memory health dashboard showing line counts, topic files, capacity, stale entries, and recommendations.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills statusInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: May 10, 2026, 3:21 AM153.0s1 file scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- status
- description:
- Memory health dashboard showing line counts, topic files, capacity, stale entries, and recommendations.
/si:status — Memory Health Dashboard
Quick overview of your project's memory state across all memory systems.
Usage
/si:status # Full dashboard
/si:status --brief # One-line summary
What It Reports
Step 1: Locate all memory files
# Auto-memory directory
MEMORY_DIR="$HOME/.claude/projects/$(pwd | sed 's|/|%2F|g; s|%2F|/|; s|^/||')/memory"
# Count lines in MEMORY.md
wc -l "$MEMORY_DIR/MEMORY.md" 2>/dev/null || echo "0"
# List topic files
ls "$MEMORY_DIR/"*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v MEMORY.md
# CLAUDE.md
wc -l ./CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null || echo "0"
wc -l ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null || echo "0"
# Rules directory
ls .claude/rules/*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l
Step 2: Analyze capacity
| Metric | Healthy | Warning | Critical | |--------|---------|---------|----------| | MEMORY.md lines | < 120 | 120-180 | > 180 | | CLAUDE.md lines | < 150 | 150-200 | > 200 | | Topic files | 0-3 | 4-6 | > 6 | | Stale entries | 0 | 1-3 | > 3 |
Step 3: Quick stale check
For each MEMORY.md entry that references a file path:
# Verify referenced files still exist
grep -oE '[a-zA-Z0-9_/.-]+\.(ts|js|py|md|json|yaml|yml)' "$MEMORY_DIR/MEMORY.md" | while read f; do
[ ! -f "$f" ] && echo "STALE: $f"
done
Step 4: Output
📊 Memory Status
Auto-Memory (MEMORY.md):
Lines: {{n}}/200 ({{bar}}) {{emoji}}
Topic files: {{count}} ({{names}})
Last updated: {{date}}
Project Rules:
CLAUDE.md: {{n}} lines
Rules: {{count}} files in .claude/rules/
User global: {{n}} lines (~/.claude/CLAUDE.md)
Health:
Capacity: {{healthy/warning/critical}}
Stale refs: {{count}} (files no longer exist)
Duplicates: {{count}} (entries repeated across files)
{{if recommendations}}
💡 Recommendations:
- {{recommendation}}
{{endif}}
Brief mode
/si:status --brief
Output: 📊 Memory: {{n}}/200 lines | {{count}} rules | {{status_emoji}} {{status_word}}
Interpretation
- Green (< 60%): Plenty of room. Auto-memory is working well.
- Yellow (60-90%): Getting full. Consider running
/si:reviewto promote or clean up. - Red (> 90%): Near capacity. Auto-memory may start dropping older entries. Run
/si:reviewnow.
Tips
- Run
/si:status --briefas a quick check anytime - If capacity is yellow+, run
/si:reviewto identify promotion candidates - Stale entries waste space — delete references to files that no longer exist
- Topic files are fine — Claude creates them to keep MEMORY.md under 200 lines
Related Skills
alirezarezvani/code-reviewer
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
16,546SKILL.mdUpdated May 10, 2026
alirezarezvani/research-ops-skills
tools
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
16,359SKILL.mdUpdated May 28, 2026
alirezarezvani/research-finance
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
16,359SKILL.mdUpdated May 28, 2026
alirezarezvani/product-research
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.
16,359SKILL.mdUpdated May 28, 2026