engineering/agenthub/skills/spawn/SKILL.md
Launch N parallel subagents in isolated git worktrees to compete on the session task.
npx skillsauth add alirezarezvani/claude-skills spawnInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Spawn N subagents that work on the same task in parallel, each in an isolated git worktree.
/hub:spawn # Spawn agents for the latest session
/hub:spawn 20260317-143022 # Spawn agents for a specific session
/hub:spawn --template optimizer # Use optimizer template for dispatch prompts
/hub:spawn --template refactorer # Use refactorer template
When --template <name> is provided, use the dispatch prompt from references/agent-templates.md instead of the default prompt below. Available templates:
| Template | Pattern | Use Case |
|----------|---------|----------|
| optimizer | Edit → eval → keep/discard → repeat x10 | Performance, latency, size reduction |
| refactorer | Restructure → test → iterate until green | Code quality, tech debt |
| test-writer | Write tests → measure coverage → repeat | Test coverage gaps |
| bug-fixer | Reproduce → diagnose → fix → verify | Bug fix with competing approaches |
When using a template, replace all {variables} with values from the session config. Assign each agent a different strategy appropriate to the template and task — diverse strategies maximize the value of parallel exploration.
.agenthub/sessions/{session-id}/config.yaml.agenthub/board/dispatch/Agent(
prompt: "You are agent-{i} in hub session {session-id}.
Your task: {task}
Read your full assignment at .agenthub/board/dispatch/{seq}-agent-{i}.md
Instructions:
1. Work in your worktree — make changes, run tests, iterate
2. Commit all changes with descriptive messages
3. Write your result summary to .agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md
Include: approach taken, files changed, metric if available, confidence level
4. Exit when done
Constraints:
- Do NOT read or modify other agents' work
- Do NOT access .agenthub/board/results/ for other agents
- Commit early and often with descriptive messages
- If you hit a dead end, commit what you have and explain in your result",
isolation: "worktree"
)
running via:python {skill_path}/scripts/session_manager.py --update {session-id} --state running
Tell the user:
/hub:status/hub:evaltools
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
tools
Use when planning, funding, scoping, or synthesizing enterprise research across workstreams — clinical study design, R&D program finance, market sizing/surveys, or product/user research. Triggers on "design this clinical study", "what sample size", "R&D budget", "burn rate", "capitalize or expense", "TAM SAM SOM", "market sizing", "survey design", "segment the market", "plan user interviews", "usability test", "synthesize research insights". Forks context to route to one of four Research-Operations sub-skills (clinical-research, research-finance, market-research, product-research) and returns a digest. Distinct from ra-qm-team (regulatory submission), finance (corporate close/valuation), research/grants (funding discovery), product-team (persona/journey/live experiments), and marketing-skill (campaign analytics).
development
Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).
development
Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.